Search strategies for conservation detection dogs

Monitoring rare or cryptic species can be challenging, especially with limited time and resources. Dogs are often used for this purpose, but methods are highly variable. There is a need to optimise search methods for dog teams so that time and resources are used as efficiently as possible. Some degree of standardisation is also desirable so that search results are comparable between different times and places. The discipline of search theory has developed effective methods to maximise the probability of detecting a search object and/or maximise the efficiency of a search. However, these advances have not been explicitly applied to the use of dogs to search for plants and animals in the wild. Here, we provide a brief introduction to search theory, then discuss how ideas from search theory might be used to standardise and optimise the use of conservation detection dogs. We describe approaches that have been used, discuss their strengths and weaknesses, and suggest priorities for further research. Standardised methods based on search theory could increase the effectiveness of conservation detection dogs, and make search results more comparable across different locations and times.

[1]  Daniel Spring,et al.  Evaluating the Feasibility of Eradicating an Invasion , 2006, Biological Invasions.

[2]  A. Glen,et al.  Wildlife detector dogs and camera traps: a comparison of techniques for detecting feral cats , 2016 .

[3]  M. Clout,et al.  Testing island biosecurity systems for invasive rats. , 2008 .

[4]  Peter Kolesar.  On Searching for Large Objects with Small Probes: A Search Model for Exploration , 1982 .

[5]  B. O. Koopman.  Search and Screening: General Principles and Historical Applications , 1980 .

[6]  J. Innes,et al.  The success of using trained dogs to locate sparse rodents in pest-free sanctuaries. , 2010 .

[7]  David L. Borchers,et al.  Distance sampling , 2001 .

[8]  K. Ralls,et al.  Assessment of scat-detection dog surveys to determine kit fox distribution , 2005 .

[9]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Estimating population density and connectivity of American mink using spatial capture-recapture. , 2016, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[10]  Michael A. McCarthy,et al.  Optimizing ecological survey effort over space and time , 2016 .

[11]  Aimee Hurt,et al.  The current and future roles of free-ranging detection dogs in conservation efforts , 2013 .

[12]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  A Framework for Inference About Carnivore Density From Unstructured Spatial Sampling of Scat Using Detector Dogs , 2012 .

[13]  R. Zappalorti,et al.  Using a Wildlife Detector Dog for Locating Eastern Indigo Snakes (Drymarchon couperi) , 2010 .

[14]  Donald C. Cooper.  Fundamentals Of Search And Rescue , 2005 .

[15]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Designing detection experiments: three more case studies , 2016 .

[16]  B. Leung,et al.  An empirical probability model of detecting species at low densities. , 2010, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[17]  D. J. Neff.  The pellet-group count technique for big game trend, census, and distribution : a review , 1968 .

[18]  J. Andrew Royle,et al.  ESTIMATING SITE OCCUPANCY RATES WHEN DETECTION PROBABILITIES ARE LESS THAN ONE , 2002, Ecology.

[19]  Amy Arbeit.  Adaptation and Automation of Search and Rescue Patterns with Implementation for an Operational Unmanned Aircraft System , 2014 .

[20]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Optimizing search strategies for invasive pests: learn before you leap , 2011 .

[21]  G. Stenhouse,et al.  Scat detection dogs in wildlife research and management: application to grizzly and black bears in the Yellowhead ecosystem, Alberta, Canada , 2004 .

[22]  J R Frost,et al.  REVIEW OF SEARCH THEORY: ADVANCES AND APPLICATIONS TO SEARCH AND RESCUE DECISION SUPPORT: FINAL REPORT , 2001 .

[23]  F. Carrick,et al.  Experimental Evaluation of Koala Scat Persistence and Detectability with Implications for Pellet-Based Fauna Census , 2012 .

[24]  L. Waits,et al.  Using Detection Dogs and Rspf Models to Assess Habitat Suitability for Bears in Greater Yellowstone , 2015 .

[25]  S. Hunter.  Resource Partitioning between Generalist Competitors & Factors Affecting the Detectability of Scat by Dogs , 2011 .

[26]  K. Leigh,et al.  An assessment of the effects of habitat structure on the scat finding performance of a wildlife detection dog , 2015 .

[27]  J Andrew Royle,et al.  Bayesian inference in camera trapping studies for a class of spatial capture-recapture models. , 2009, Ecology.

[28]  T. Clements,et al.  Identifying Conservation Successes, Failures and Future Opportunities; Assessing Recovery Potential of Wild Ungulates and Tigers in Eastern Cambodia , 2012, PloS one.

[29]  W. Heuwieser,et al.  An approach to identify bias in scent detection dog testing , 2017 .

[30]  Céline Frère,et al.  Accuracy and efficiency of detection dogs: a powerful new tool for koala conservation and management , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[31]  C. Donlan,et al.  Bio-Economics of Large-Scale Eradication of Feral Goats From Santiago Island, Galápagos , 2009 .

[32]  Paul J. Doherty,et al.  An analysis of probability of area techniques for missing persons in Yosemite National Park , 2014 .

[33]  P. Boag,et al.  Integrated and novel survey methods for rhinoceros populations confirm the extinction of Rhinoceros sondaicus annamiticus from Vietnam , 2012 .

[34]  Odor-adsorptive clothing, environmental factors, and search-dog ability , 2002 .

[35]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Estimating detection-effort curves for plants using search experiments. , 2011, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[36]  Zong Woo Geem,et al.  Harmony Search Algorithms for Water and Environmental Systems , 2009 .

[37]  J. Buzas,et al.  Effectiveness of Scat Detection Dogs for Detecting Forest Carnivores , 2007 .

[38]  Developing the Concept of Estimating Bobwhite Density With Pointing Dogs , 2008 .

[39]  Cindy E Hauser,et al.  It takes a village: detection dogs, partnerships and volunteers aid hawkweed eradication in mainland Australia. , 2016 .

[40]  E. Arnett,et al.  A Preliminary Evaluation on the Use of Dogs to Recover Bat Fatalities at Wind Energy Facilities , 2006 .

[41]  John D. J. Clare,et al.  Predicting bobcat abundance at a landscape scale and evaluating occupancy as a density index in central Wisconsin , 2015 .

[42]  John C. Sagebiel,et al.  Olfaction-based Detection Distance: A Quantitative Analysis of How Far Away Dogs Recognize Tortoise Odor and Follow It to Source , 2008, Sensors.

[43]  J. Buzas,et al.  Comparing Scat Detection Dogs, Cameras, and Hair Snares for Surveying Carnivores , 2007 .

[44]  James M. Johnston,et al.  Training and maintaining the performance of dogs (Canis familiaris) on an increasing number of odor discriminations in a controlled setting , 2002 .

[45]  John D. J. Clare,et al.  Comparing the costs and detectability of bobcat using scat‐detecting dog and remote camera surveys in central Wisconsin , 2015 .

[46]  L. Hanigan,et al.  Determining the feasibility of training a dog to detect Hieracium species. , 2014 .

[47]  D. Ward,et al.  Using spatially explicit surveillance models to provide confidence in the eradication of an invasive ant , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[48]  Cindy E. Hauser,et al.  Streamlining 'search and destroy': cost-effective surveillance for invasive species management. , 2009, Ecology letters.

[49]  S. Mahoney,et al.  Evaluating noninvasive genetic sampling techniques to estimate large carnivore abundance , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[50]  D. Ghose,et al.  Search using multiple UAVs with flight time constraints , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems.

[51]  K. Ralls,et al.  Changes in Kit Fox Defecation Patterns During the Reproductive Season: Implications for Noninvasive Surveys , 2010 .

[52]  Hugh W. McGregor,et al.  Live-capture of feral cats using tracking dogs and darting, with comparisons to leg-hold trapping , 2016, Wildlife Research.

[53]  R. Q. Robe,et al.  A Method for Determining Effective Sweep Widths for Land Searches. Procedures for Conducting Detection Experiments , 2002 .

[54]  W. Getz,et al.  Detection Distance and Environmental Factors in Conservation Detection Dog Surveys , 2011 .

[55]  S. Mahoney,et al.  A comparison of morphological and molecular diet analyses of predator scats , 2016, Journal of Mammalogy.

[56]  John R. Frost,et al.  Compatibility of Land SAR Procedures with Search Theory , 2003 .

[57]  K. Mengersen,et al.  Detection survey design for decision making during biosecurity incursions. , 2015 .

[58]  Hugh P. Possingham,et al.  Protecting islands from pest invasion: optimal allocation of biosecurity resources between quarantine and surveillance , 2010 .

[59]  Daniel Spring,et al.  Applying Search Theory to Determine the Feasibility of Eradicating an Invasive Population in Natural Environments , 2007 .

[60]  K. Ralls,et al.  Latrine use by San Joaquin kit foxes ( Vulpes macrotis mutica ) and coyotes ( Canis latrans ) , 2004 .

[61]  David J. Muñoz,et al.  USE OF WILDLIFE DETECTOR DOGS TO STUDY EASTERN BOX TURTLE ( TERRAPENE CAROLINA CAROLINA ) POPULATIONS , 2012 .

[62]  A dog as a generalist plant detection tool , 2017 .

[63]  M. Kelly,et al.  Noninvasive sampling for carnivores , 2015 .

[64]  Gianni A. Di Caro,et al.  GIS-based Mission Support System for Wilderness Search and Rescue with Heterogeneous Agents , 2012 .

[65]  Mary E Cablk,et al.  Validation and Development of a Certification Program for Using K9s to Survey Desert Tortoises , 2011 .

[66]  G Garrard,et al.  Estimating detection rates and probabilities , 2015 .

[67]  R. Reed,et al.  Canine detection of free-ranging brown treesnakes on Guam , 2011 .

[68]  K. Stafford,et al.  The detection and identification of tuatara and gecko scents by dogs , 2015 .

[69]  Mary E Cablk,et al.  Accuracy and reliability of dogs in surveying for desert tortoise (Gopherus agassizii). , 2006, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[70]  D. K. Weaver,et al.  Trained Dogs Outperform Human Surveyors in the Detection of Rare Spotted Knapweed (Centaurea stoebe) , 2010, Invasive Plant Science and Management.

[71]  Steve Alpern,et al.  Optimal search and ambush for a hider who can escape the search region , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[72]  Joel W. Burdick,et al.  A Decision-Making Framework for Control Strategies in Probabilistic Search , 2007, Proceedings 2007 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[73]  T. Howell,et al.  Using Scent Detection Dogs in Conservation Settings: A Review of Scientific Literature Regarding Their Selection , 2016, Front. Vet. Sci..

[74]  A. Guisan,et al.  Areas of high conservation value in Georgia: present and future threats by invasive alien plants , 2015, Biological Invasions.