Bidirectional Selection for Body Weight on Standing Genetic Variation in a Chicken Model

Experimental populations of model organisms provide valuable opportunities to unravel the genomic impact of selection in a controlled system. The Virginia body weight chicken lines represent a unique resource to investigate signatures of selection in a system where long-term, single-trait, bidirectional selection has been carried out for more than 60 generations. At 55 generations of divergent selection, earlier analyses of pooled genome resequencing data from these lines revealed that 14.2% of the genome showed extreme differentiation between the selected lines, contained within 395 genomic regions. Here, we report more detailed analyses of these data exploring the regions displaying within- and between-line genomic signatures of the bidirectional selection applied in these lines. Despite the strict selection regime for opposite extremes in body weight, this did not result in opposite genomic signatures between the lines. The lines often displayed a duality of the sweep signatures, where an extended region of homozygosity in one line, in contrast to mosaic pattern of heterozygosity in the other line. These haplotype mosaics consisted of short, distinct haploblocks of variable between-line divergence, likely the results of a complex demographic history involving bottlenecks, introgressions and moderate inbreeding. We demonstrate this using the example of complex haplotype mosaicism in the growth1 QTL. These mosaics represent the standing genetic variation available at the onset of selection in the founder population. Selection on standing genetic variation can thus result in different signatures depending on the intensity and direction of selection.

[1]  L. Andersson,et al.  Genomic signatures of 60 years of bidirectional selection for 8‐week body weight in chickens , 2018, Poultry science.

[2]  P. Siegel,et al.  Correlated responses to long‐term divergent selection for 8‐week body weight in female White Plymouth Rock chickens: Sexual maturity , 2017, Poultry science.

[3]  Ö. Carlborg,et al.  Artificial Selection Response due to Polygenic Adaptation from a Multilocus, Multiallelic Genetic Architecture , 2017, Molecular biology and evolution.

[4]  P. Siegel,et al.  Selection for juvenile body weight in chickens: Standardizing for scaling , 2017, Poultry science.

[5]  C. Ashwell,et al.  Genome-wide standing variation facilitates long-term response to bidirectional selection for antibody response in chickens , 2017, BMC Genomics.

[6]  B. Lilje,et al.  Spread of avian pathogenic Escherichia coli ST117 O78:H4 in Nordic broiler production , 2017, BMC Genomics.

[7]  Alessandro Vullo,et al.  Ensembl 2017 , 2016, Nucleic Acids Res..

[8]  Daniel R. Schrider,et al.  Soft Sweeps Are the Dominant Mode of Adaptation in the Human Genome , 2016, bioRxiv.

[9]  Q. Nie,et al.  A short insertion mutation disrupts genesis of miR-16 and causes increased body weight in domesticated chicken , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Ö. Carlborg,et al.  Imputation-Based Fine-Mapping Suggests That Most QTL in an Outbred Chicken Advanced Intercross Body Weight Line Are Due to Multiple, Linked Loci , 2016, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[11]  Li-ren Han,et al.  Substance P Promotes the Proliferation, but Inhibits Differentiation and Mineralization of Osteoblasts from Rats with Spinal Cord Injury via RANKL/OPG System , 2016, PloS one.

[12]  N. Yang,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Studies for Comb Traits in Chickens , 2016, PloS one.

[13]  F. Cunningham,et al.  The Ensembl Variant Effect Predictor , 2016, Genome Biology.

[14]  F. Pauler,et al.  Long non-coding RNAs display higher natural expression variation than protein-coding genes in healthy humans , 2016, Genome Biology.

[15]  Y. Wang,et al.  Single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with growth traits in Jinghai yellow chickens. , 2015, Genetics and molecular research : GMR.

[16]  J. Wang,et al.  Genome-wide association study on reproductive traits in Jinghai Yellow Chicken. , 2015, Animal reproduction science.

[17]  N. Yang,et al.  Genome-wide association studies for feed intake and efficiency in two laying periods of chickens , 2015, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[18]  N. Yang,et al.  Genome-wide association study dissects genetic architecture underlying longitudinal egg weights in chickens , 2015, BMC Genomics.

[19]  Mats E. Pettersson,et al.  Standing genetic variation as a major contributor to adaptation in the Virginia chicken lines selection experiment , 2015, Genome Biology.

[20]  R. Tempelman,et al.  Improving the computational efficiency of fully Bayes inference and assessing the effect of misspecification of hyperparameters in whole-genome prediction models , 2015, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[21]  H. Simianer,et al.  Global diversity and genetic contributions of chicken populations from African, Asian and European regions. , 2014, Animal genetics.

[22]  Andreas E. Lundberg,et al.  Identification of candidate genes and mutations in QTL regions for chicken growth using bioinformatic analysis of NGS and SNP-chip data , 2013, Front. Genet..

[23]  Mats E. Pettersson,et al.  Dynamics of Adaptive Alleles in Divergently Selected Body Weight Lines of Chickens , 2013, G3: Genes, Genomes, Genetics.

[24]  G. Coop,et al.  A Population Genetic Signal of Polygenic Adaptation , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[25]  M. McGilliard,et al.  Phenotypic responses of chickens to long-term, bidirectional selection for juvenile body weight--historical perspective. , 2013, Poultry science.

[26]  Mats E. Pettersson,et al.  Genetic dissection of growth traits in a Chinese indigenous × commercial broiler chicken cross , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[27]  Mats E. Pettersson,et al.  Genetic dissection of growth traits in a Chinese indigenous × commercial broiler chicken cross , 2013, BMC Genomics.

[28]  Philipp W. Messer,et al.  Recent Selective Sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster Show Signatures of Soft Sweeps , 2013, PLoS genetics.

[29]  A. Billard,et al.  Investigating Gaze of Children with ASD in Naturalistic Settings , 2012, PloS one.

[30]  D. Tautz,et al.  Parallel Selection Mapping Using Artificially Selected Mice Reveals Body Weight Control Loci , 2012, Current Biology.

[31]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration , 2012, Briefings Bioinform..

[32]  Xiaoxiang Hu,et al.  Genome-Wide Association Study Identified a Narrow Chromosome 1 Region Associated with Chicken Growth Traits , 2012, PloS one.

[33]  Heng Li,et al.  A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data , 2011, Bioinform..

[34]  Mats E. Pettersson,et al.  Replication and Explorations of High-Order Epistasis Using a Large Advanced Intercross Line Pedigree , 2011, PLoS genetics.

[35]  P. VanRaden,et al.  Genomic evaluations with many more genotypes , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[36]  M. Tixier-Boichard,et al.  Chicken domestication: from archeology to genomics. , 2011, Comptes rendus biologies.

[37]  Ryan D. Hernandez,et al.  Classic Selective Sweeps Were Rare in Recent Human Evolution , 2011, Science.

[38]  L. Andersson,et al.  Fine mapping and replication of QTL in outbred chicken advanced intercross lines , 2011, Genetics Selection Evolution.

[39]  A. Futschik,et al.  PoPoolation: A Toolbox for Population Genetic Analysis of Next Generation Sequencing Data from Pooled Individuals , 2011, PloS one.

[40]  Helga Thorvaldsdóttir,et al.  Integrative Genomics Viewer , 2011, Nature Biotechnology.

[41]  P. Siegel,et al.  Genetic diversity and population structure in lines of chickens divergently selected for high and low 8-week body weight. , 2010, Poultry science.

[42]  Mats E. Pettersson,et al.  Genome-Wide Effects of Long-Term Divergent Selection , 2010, PLoS genetics.

[43]  Kevin R. Thornton,et al.  Genome-wide analysis of a long-term evolution experiment with Drosophila , 2010, Nature.

[44]  Jonathan K. Pritchard,et al.  Adaptation – not by sweeps alone , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[45]  M. DePristo,et al.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. , 2010, Genome research.

[46]  Mats E. Pettersson,et al.  Dissecting the genetic architecture of complex traits and its impact on genetic improvement programs: lessons learnt from the Virginia chicken lines. , 2010 .

[47]  Hie-Lim Kim,et al.  The Origin and Genetic Variation of Domestic Chickens with Special Reference to Junglefowls Gallus g. gallus and G. varius , 2010, PloS one.

[48]  R Negrini,et al.  Genetic diversity in farm animals--a review. , 2010, Animal genetics.

[49]  Joseph K. Pickrell,et al.  The Genetics of Human Adaptation: Hard Sweeps, Soft Sweeps, and Polygenic Adaptation , 2010, Current Biology.

[50]  Arthur C. Smith The Plymouth Rock Standard And Breed Book , 2009 .

[51]  Gonçalo R. Abecasis,et al.  The Sequence Alignment/Map format and SAMtools , 2009, Bioinform..

[52]  Joseph K. Pickrell,et al.  The Role of Geography in Human Adaptation , 2009, PLoS genetics.

[53]  I. Gut,et al.  Genetic analysis of an F2 intercross between two chicken lines divergently selected for body-weight , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[54]  G. Lanfranchi,et al.  Reconstruction and functional analysis of altered molecular pathways in human atherosclerotic arteries , 2009, BMC Genomics.

[55]  L. Andersson,et al.  Identification of the Yellow Skin Gene Reveals a Hybrid Origin of the Domestic Chicken , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[56]  D. Bilder,et al.  Dynein Regulates Epithelial Polarity and the Apical Localization of stardust A mRNA , 2008, PLoS genetics.

[57]  K. Taylor,et al.  Genome-Wide Association , 2007, Diabetes.

[58]  K. Lindblad-Toh,et al.  Efficient mapping of mendelian traits in dogs through genome-wide association , 2007, Nature Genetics.

[59]  S. Lamont,et al.  Genome-wide association analysis reveals cryptic alleles as an important factor in heterosis for fatness in chicken F2 population. , 2007, Animal genetics.

[60]  Kosuke M. Teshima,et al.  Directional Positive Selection on an Allele of Arbitrary Dominance , 2006, Genetics.

[61]  L. Andersson,et al.  Many QTLs with minor additive effects are associated with a large difference in growth between two selection lines in chickens. , 2005, Genetical research.

[62]  J. Hermisson,et al.  Soft Sweeps , 2005, Genetics.

[63]  P. Siegel,et al.  Long-term divergent selection for eight-week body weight in white Plymouth rock chickens. , 1996, Poultry science.

[64]  Thomas Wiehe,et al.  The Effect of Strongly Selected Substitutions on Neutral Polymorphism: Analytical Results Based on Diffusion Theory , 1992 .

[65]  N L Kaplan,et al.  The "hitchhiking effect" revisited. , 1989, Genetics.

[66]  B. West,et al.  Did chickens go north? New evidence for domestication , 1988 .

[67]  P. Siegel Selection for Body Weight at Eight Weeks of Age 1. Short term Response and Heritabilities , 1962 .

[68]  J. Peters Chicken: Domestication , 2020, Encyclopedia of Global Archaeology.

[69]  N. Barton,et al.  Reconstruction of Haplotype-Blocks Selected during Experimental Evolution , 2017, Molecular biology and evolution.

[70]  D. Schluter,et al.  Adaptation from standing genetic variation. , 2008, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[71]  Claude-Alain H. Roten,et al.  Theoretical and practical advances in genome halving , 2004 .

[72]  Michael S. Lindberg The Role of Geography , 1998 .

[73]  J. Gale Hitch-Hiking Effect of a Favourable Gene , 1980 .

[74]  J. Haigh,et al.  The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. , 1974, Genetical research.