Towards a Full Circular Economy in Biogas Plants: Sustainable Management of Digestate for Growing Biomass Feedstocks and Use as Biofertilizer

The digestate is a prospective biofertilizer and potential source of income for many biogas plants worldwide. However, its actual impact on the soil properties and biomass yield is still unexploited. The different digestates from eight agricultural biogas plants were researched in terms of their chemical composition and the fertilizing potential. The results obtained from digestate chemical analysis indicate that the digestate biomass had large amount of nitrogen (up to 73 g kg−1 fresh mass) and potassium (up to 25 g kg−1 fresh mass). The value of the digestate was estimated in the range of 2.88–7.89 EUR Mg−1 for liquid digestate and 7.62–13.61 EUR Mg−1 for solid digestate based on the commercial fertilizer market price of nitrogen, potassium phosphorus, organic carbon, Cu, Zn, Fe and Mg. The digestate produced at the 1 MW biogas plant is worth EUR 941–2095 per day in addition to energy sales income. The application of digestate on low-fertility land in areas close to the biogas plant allows the production of up to three-fold more biomass suitable for biogas production. The digestate’s application on semi-natural grass biomass production in the low-fertility soils near the biogas plants could be an alternative strategy for the biogas plant feedstock portfolio diversification.

[1]  A. Šlepetienė,et al.  The effect of digestate fertilisation on grass biogas yield and soil properties in field-biomass-biogas-field renewable energy production approach in Lithuania , 2021 .

[2]  F. Adani,et al.  Techno-economic assessment at full scale of a biogas refinery plant receiving nitrogen rich feedstock and producing renewable energy and biobased fertilisers , 2021, Journal of cleaner production.

[3]  X. Gómez,et al.  Biogas Production from Organic Wastes: Integrating Concepts of Circular Economy , 2021, Fuels.

[4]  M. A. Abood,et al.  Potassium availability in soil amended with organic matter and phosphorous fertiliser under water stress during maize (Zea mays L) growth , 2021 .

[5]  S. Uludag-Demirer,et al.  Post-anaerobic treatability and residual biogas potential of digestate , 2021, Biomass Conversion and Biorefinery.

[6]  Yanwen Shen,et al.  Effect of digestate and digestate supplemented with biochar on switchgrass growth and chemical composition , 2021 .

[7]  S. Anderberg,et al.  Dimensions and characteristics of biogas policies – Modelling the European policy landscape , 2021 .

[8]  E. M. Barampouti,et al.  Exploring technological alternatives of nutrient recovery from digestate as a secondary resource , 2020 .

[9]  K. Venslauskas,et al.  The effect of digestate and mineral fertilisation of cocksfoot grass on greenhouse gas emissions in a cocksfoot-based biogas production system , 2020, Energy, Sustainability and Society.

[10]  H. Pawlak-Kruczek,et al.  Pathogen Reduction Potential in Anaerobic Digestion of Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Food Waste , 2020, Molecules.

[11]  P. Pochwatka,et al.  Digestate management in polish farms as an element of the nutrient cycle , 2020 .

[12]  I. Liaudanskienė,et al.  The potential of digestate as a biofertilizer in eroded soils of Lithuania. , 2019, Waste management.

[13]  G. Esposito,et al.  Trace Elements in Anaerobic Biotechnologies , 2019 .

[14]  Y. Bareha,et al.  Modeling the fate of organic nitrogen during anaerobic digestion: Development of a bioaccessibility based ADM1. , 2019, Water research.

[15]  Wei Peng,et al.  Sustainable Management of Digestate from the Organic Fraction of Municipal Solid Waste and Food Waste Under the Concepts of Back to Earth Alternatives and Circular Economy , 2019 .

[16]  C. Wardak,et al.  Assessing fate and bioavailability of trace elements in soils after digestate application , 2019, Trace Elements in Anaerobic Biotechnologies.

[17]  Ademola Oyejide Adebayo,et al.  Effect of Organic Loading Rate on Biogas Yields of Pig Slurry in a Continuously Stirred Tank Reactor at Mesophilic Temperature , 2019, Procedia Manufacturing.

[18]  W. Fuchs,et al.  Tackling ammonia inhibition for efficient biogas production from chicken manure: Status and technical trends in Europe and China , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[19]  C. Fabbri,et al.  Unravelling (maize silage) digestate features throughout a full-scale plant: A spectroscopic and thermal approach , 2018, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[20]  A. Tariq,et al.  Phosphorous fertilization alleviates drought effects on Alnus cremastogyne by regulating its antioxidant and osmotic potential , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[21]  W. Czekała,et al.  Nutrient Value of Digestate from Agricultural Biogas Plant in Poland , 2018, 2018 2nd International Conference on Green Energy and Applications (ICGEA).

[22]  R. Dong,et al.  Performance evaluation of a novel anaerobic digestion operation process for treating high-solids content chicken manure: Effect of reduction of the hydraulic retention time at a constant organic loading rate. , 2017, Waste management.

[23]  B. Fernández,et al.  Optimization of the anaerobic co-digestion of pasteurized slaughterhouse waste, pig slurry and glycerine. , 2017, Waste management.

[24]  Berien Elbersen,et al.  Optimal use of biogas from waste streams : an assessment of the potential of biogas from digestion in the EU beyond 2020 , 2017 .

[25]  Moktar Hamdi,et al.  Effect of thermal pretreatment on the biogas production and microbial communities balance during anaerobic digestion of urban and industrial waste activated sludge. , 2016, Bioresource technology.

[26]  I. S. Horváth,et al.  Recent updates on biogas production - a review , 2016 .

[27]  A. Lücke,et al.  Energizing marginal soils – The establishment of the energy crop Sida hermaphrodita as dependent on digestate fertilization, NPK, and legume intercropping , 2016 .

[28]  Enrico Benetto,et al.  Environmental assessment of digestate treatment technologies using LCA methodology. , 2015, Waste management.

[29]  Shiwei Guo,et al.  The Critical Role of Potassium in Plant Stress Response , 2013, International journal of molecular sciences.

[30]  H. Møller,et al.  Process performance of anaerobic co-digestion of raw and acidified pig slurry. , 2012, Water research.

[31]  H. Kage,et al.  Short-term effects of biogas residue application on yield performance and N balance parameters of maize in different cropping systems , 2012, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[32]  Z. Rengel,et al.  Zinc in Soils and Crop Nutrition , 2011 .

[33]  Emma Nehrenheim,et al.  Land application of organic waste – Effects on the soil ecosystem , 2011 .

[34]  N. Senesi,et al.  Qualitative Characterization and Differentiation of Digestates from Different Biowastes Using FTIR and Fluorescence Spectroscopies , 2011 .

[35]  P. Ambus,et al.  Evaluating effects of sewage sludge and household compost on soil physical, chemical and microbiological properties , 2002 .