Comparison of methods to quantify the number of bites in calves grazing winter oats with different sward heights

Abstract The requirement to measure the constituents of ingestive behaviour in grazing ruminants, such as the number and type of jaw movements, is essential for understanding the herbage intake process. In this experiment, three methods of recording grazing behaviour were compared: visual observation (VO; four trained observers), solid-state behaviour recorder (SSBR) and acoustic recorder (AR), in order to quantify the number of bites taken by Holstein–Friesian calves (138±11kg LW) grazing winter oat ( Avena sativa ) pastures with different sward surface heights (SSH): tall (T; 52.4±9.9cm), medium (M; 26.5±4.9cm) and short (S; 14.6±3.4cm). The number of bites was recorded on nine calves with VO, SSBR and AR during 5-min grazing sessions on each sward height. In addition, the total grazing jaw movements (GJM) and bites per GJM (PB) were calculated from the SSBR and the AR methods. The experiment was conducted on 3 days, and on each day three animals grazed on each of the three sward heights in a randomised sequence. Sound files from AR were analysed visually and aurally (Sound Forge 9.0) and recordings by SSBR were analysed using the dedicated software ‘Graze 8.0'. Data were analysed by three-way ANOVA. There were no statistical differences ( P >0.05) in the number of bites counted by the observers. The number of bites did not differ significantly between AR and VO, but were lower for SSBR ( P P P

[1]  L. Delaby,et al.  Influence of carbohydrate or protein supplementation on intake, behaviour and digestion in dairy cows strip-grazing low-nitrogen fertilized perennial ryegrass , 1999 .

[2]  R. J. Orr,et al.  Intake characteristics of perennial ryegrass varieties when grazed by yearling beef cattle under rotational grazing management , 2005 .

[3]  M. Desnoyers,et al.  Comparison of video recording and a portable electronic device for measuring the feeding behaviour of individually housed dairy goats , 2009 .

[4]  M. J. Gibb,et al.  The effect of physiological state (lactating or dry) and sward surface height on grazing behaviour and intake by dairy cows , 1999 .

[5]  S. M. Rutter,et al.  Recent developments with the IGER behaviour recorder , 1998 .

[6]  Eugene D. Ungar,et al.  Classifying cattle jaw movements: Comparing IGER Behaviour Recorder and acoustic techniques , 2006 .

[7]  P. Gregorini,et al.  The Effects of a Morning Fasting on the Evening Grazing Behavior and Performance of Strip-Grazed Beef Heifers , 2007 .

[8]  Diego H. Milone,et al.  Computational method for segmentation and classification of ingestive sounds in sheep , 2009 .

[9]  Karen A. Beauchemin,et al.  An Automatic System for Quantification of Eating and Ruminating Activities of Dairy Cattle Housed in Stalls , 1989 .

[10]  S M Rutter,et al.  Graze: A program to analyze recordings of the jaw movements of ruminants , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[11]  S. Tamminga,et al.  Duration of regrowth of ryegrass (Lolium perenne) effects on grazing behavior, intake, rumen fill, and fermentation of lactating dairy cows. , 2000, Journal of dairy science.

[12]  Mayne,et al.  The relationship between level of sward height reduction in a rotationally grazed sward and short-term intake rates of dairy cows , 1999 .

[13]  W. Spinks,et al.  The horizontal barrier effect of stems on the foraging behaviour of cattle grazing five tropical grasses , 2009 .

[14]  H. Boland GRAZING BEHAVIOR OF BEEF STEERS GRAZING ENDOPHYTE-INFECTED, ENDOPHYTE-FREE, AND NOVEL ENDOPHYTE INFECTED TALL FESCUE, AND LAKOTA PRAIRIE GRASS , 2005 .

[15]  Doug Tolleson,et al.  Comparison of bite size, biting rate and grazing time of beef heifers from herds distinguished by mature size and rate of maturity. , 1990, Journal of animal science.

[16]  S. M. Rutter,et al.  An automatic system to record foraging behaviour in free-ranging ruminants , 1997 .

[17]  Laca,et al.  Acoustic measurement of intake and grazing behaviour of cattle , 2000 .

[18]  A. Forbes,et al.  Evaluation of the effect of eprinomectin in young dairy heifers sub-clinically infected with gastrointestinal nematodes on grazing behaviour and diet selection. , 2007, Veterinary parasitology.

[19]  M. J. Gibb,et al.  Effect of time of day on grazing behaviour by lactating dairy cows , 1998 .

[20]  Emilio A. Laca,et al.  An integrated methodology for studying short-term grazing behaviour of cattle , 1992 .

[21]  Emilio A. Laca,et al.  Acoustic monitoring of chewing and intake of fresh and dry forages in steers , 2006 .

[22]  Emilio A. Laca,et al.  Mechanisms of handling time and intake rate of a large mammalian grazer , 1994 .

[23]  James P. S. Neel,et al.  Original papers: Acoustic monitoring system to quantify ingestive behavior of free-grazing cattle , 2011 .

[24]  Remy Delagarde,et al.  Development of an automatic bitemeter for grazing cattle , 1999 .

[25]  R. J. Orr,et al.  Ingestive behaviour of heifers grazing monocultures of ryegrass or white clover , 2002 .

[26]  A. Laidlaw,et al.  Effect of duration of fasting period on short-term intake rates of lactating dairy cows , 1998 .

[27]  M. Gibb,et al.  Effects of level of concentrate supplementation on grazing behaviour and performance by lactating dairy cows grazing continuously stocked grass swards , 2002 .

[28]  Stephen Morris,et al.  Effect of sward surface height on herbage intake and performance of finishing beef cattle , 1998 .