[Risk factors for the appearance of central venous catheters colonisation].

INTRODUCTION/AIM Intravascular device placement (IVD) is a part of everyday medical practice, however, its application is associated with a high risk of onset of nosocomial infections (NI) and increased mortality and morbidity. Nosocomial blood infections (NBIs) account for 10% of all the registered NI. NBIs are more frequent in patients with a placed IVD and it present an important risk factor for the onset of NBI, i.e. catheter-associated NBIs (CANBIs). Pathogenesis of CANBIs is complex and conditioned by the presence of different characteristics related to a catheter, patient and a specific causative organism. The most common CRBSI causes include coagulase-negative staphylococcus, S. aureus, Enterobacter spp, Candida spp, Klebsiella spp, Pseudomonas spp. and Enterococcus spp. METHODS All the patients hospitalized at the Intensive Care Department of the Clinic of Digestive Diseases over the period January 1, 2004-September 1, 2004 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included 107 patients in whom central venous catheter (CVC) was placed for more than 48 h. All the causes isolated from a CVC segment were recorded. Culture, isolation and identification of the causative organisms were performed using standard microbiological methods in the Bacteriological Laboratory within the Emergency Center, Clinical Center of Serbia. Catheter segment samples (tip of the CVC 3-5 cm long) were analyzed. Based on the insight into medical documentation, patients' examination and medical staff interview, catheter and patient-related characteristics were recorded. RESULTS A total of 107 CVCs were analyzed, out of which 56 (52%) were sterile while 51 (48%) were colonized. The results of our study evidenced that total parenteral nutrition (TPN) (p < 0.05), number of catheterization days (p < 0.05), and central venous pressure measurement (p < 0.05) were significantly associated with CVC colonization. In this study, no statistically significant difference in catheter colonization was found with respect to sex, age, anatomical insertion site and CVC placement site. CONCLUSION According to the results of our study, TPN, the number of catheterization days and measurement of central venous pressure play major roles in colonization of CVC. Understanding risk factors associated with CVC colonization and onset of CANBIs is a prerequisite for quality preventive work of health professionals.

[1]  B. Malmvall,et al.  Central venous catheter infections at a county hospital in Sweden: a prospective analysis of colonization, incidence of infection and risk factors , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[2]  M. Desco,et al.  Clinical-epidemiological characteristics and outcome of patients with catheter-related bloodstream infections in Europe (ESGNI-006 Study). , 2004, Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.

[3]  B. Walder,et al.  Colonization and Bloodstream Infection with Single- Versus Multi-Lumen Central Venous Catheters: A Quantitative Systematic Review , 2004, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[4]  N. Petrosillo,et al.  Clinical review: New technologies for prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections , 2003, Critical Care.

[5]  F. Roudot-thoraval,et al.  The costs of septic syndromes in the intensive care unit and influence of hospital-acquired sepsis , 2003, Intensive Care Medicine.

[6]  G. Sadoyama,et al.  Comparison between the jugular and subclavian vein as insertion site for central venous catheters: microbiological aspects and risk factors for colonization and infection. , 2003, The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases.

[7]  J. Burke,et al.  Infection control - a problem for patient safety. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  R. D. McCormick,et al.  Guidelines for the Prevention of Intravascular Catheter–Related Infections , 2002, Infection Control &#x0026; Hospital Epidemiology.

[9]  Martina niChonghaile Complications of Femoral and Subclavian Venous Catheterization in Critically Ill Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2002 .

[10]  D. Maki,et al.  The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. II. Long-term devices. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[11]  D. Maki,et al.  The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. I. Pathogenesis and short-term devices. , 2002, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[12]  L. Mermel,et al.  Guidelines for the management of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2001, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[13]  E. Wong,et al.  Impact of hospital care on incidence of bloodstream infection: the evaluation of processes and indicators in infection control study. , 2001, Emerging infectious diseases.

[14]  R. Wenzel,et al.  The impact of hospital-acquired bloodstream infections. , 2001, Emerging infectious diseases.

[15]  R. M. Donlan,et al.  Biofilms and device-associated infections. , 2001, Emerging infectious diseases.

[16]  J. Rello,et al.  Evaluation of outcome of intravenous catheter-related infections in critically ill patients. , 2000, American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine.

[17]  I. Raad Management of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 2000, The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy.

[18]  O. Wenker,et al.  Comparison of Two Antimicrobial—Impregnated Central Venous Catheters , 1999 .

[19]  S. Finfer,et al.  Incidence and Predictors of Central Venous Catheter Related Infection in Intensive Care Patients , 1999, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[20]  O. Wenker,et al.  A comparison of two antimicrobial-impregnated central venous catheters. Catheter Study Group. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  I. Raad,et al.  Intravascular-catheter-related infections , 1998, The Lancet.

[22]  D. Dries,et al.  Care of central venous catheters for total parenteral nutrition. , 1996, Nutrition in clinical practice : official publication of the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition.

[23]  D. Pittet,et al.  Nosocomial bloodstream infections. Secular trends in rates, mortality, and contribution to total hospital deaths. , 1995, Archives of internal medicine.

[24]  L. Mermel,et al.  Prevention of intravascular catheter-related infections. , 1994, Annals of internal medicine.

[25]  M. Moro,et al.  Risk factors for central venous catheter-related infections in surgical and intensive care units. The Central Venous Catheter-Related Infections Study Group. , 1994, Infection control and hospital epidemiology.

[26]  H. Richet,et al.  Prospective multicenter study of vascular-catheter-related complications and risk factors for positive central-catheter cultures in intensive care unit patients , 1990, Journal of clinical microbiology.

[27]  National Nosocomial Infections Surveillance (NNIS) System Report, data summary from January 1992 through June 2004, issued October 2004. , 2004, American journal of infection control.

[28]  A. Charlett,et al.  Device-related sources of bacteraemia in English hospitals--opportunities for the prevention of hospital-acquired bacteraemia. , 2003, The Journal of hospital infection.

[29]  C. Liu,et al.  Risk factors of catheter-related infections in total parenteral nutrition catheterization. , 2001, Zhonghua yi xue za zhi = Chinese medical journal; Free China ed.

[30]  J. Crump,et al.  Intravascular Catheter-Associated Infections , 2000, European Journal of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases.