Digital Control Generations -- Digital Controls for Power Electronics through the Third Generation

Digital control in power electronics can be divided into three "generations." First-generation digital controls use digital "outside the loop" in communications, setup, and supervisory roles. Second generation digital controls use digital processes "inside the loop," including discrete-time feedback loops and sometimes even digital signal processing. Today, first-generation digital methods are expanding quickly, as new communication protocols and adjustable analog loops become common. Even companies that continue to design analog controls for power electronics often include these types of digital processes. Second-generation digital controls are a hot topic right now, as real-time digital controllers become feasible. In third-generation digital controls, the digital process functions directly with individual switches to push performance up to the physical limits of power electronics. A digital switch decides when it must turn on or off. The control is on direct switch timing rather than a converter duty ratio or a setting. Extreme performance is possible with this approach, such as converters that do not exhibit output disturbances when confronted with load or line step changes. The talk compares these different arenas, all of which are current active topics in power electronics, and shows what can become possible as the third generation develops.

[1]  S. M. Williams,et al.  Adaptive frequency domain control of PWM switched power line conditioner , 1990 .

[2]  Seth R. Sanders,et al.  On limit cycles and the describing function method in periodically switched circuits , 1993 .

[3]  Seth R. Sanders,et al.  Quantization resolution and limit cycling in digitally controlled PWM converters , 2003 .

[4]  Ivan Celanovic,et al.  A new distributed digital controller for the next generation of power electronics building blocks , 2000, APEC 2000. Fifteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (Cat. No.00CH37058).

[5]  Dragan Maksimovic,et al.  Sensorless optimization of dead times in dc–dc converters with synchronous rectifiers , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics.

[6]  Thomas G. Wilson,et al.  Analytic derivation and evaluation of a state-trajectory control law for DC-to-DC converters , 1977, 1977 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[7]  J. J. Hill,et al.  Integral sampling , 1973 .

[8]  Jonathan W. Kimball,et al.  Real-time optimization of dead time for motor control inverters , 1997, PESC97. Record 28th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference. Formerly Power Conditioning Specialists Conference 1970-71. Power Processing and Electronic Specialists Conference 1972.

[9]  G. Temes Delta-sigma data converters , 1994 .

[10]  P.T. Krein,et al.  Transient Reduction of Dc-Dc Converters Via Augmentation and Geometric Control , 2007, 2007 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[11]  P.T. Krein,et al.  Feasibility of Geometric Digital Controls and Augmentation for Ultrafast Dc-Dc Converter Response , 2006, 2006 IEEE Workshops on Computers in Power Electronics.

[12]  H. Matsuo,et al.  Dynamic characteristics of the digitally controlled DC-DC converter , 1988, PESC '88 Record., 19th Annual IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference.

[13]  Peyton Z. Peebles Communication System Principles , 1976 .

[14]  G.C. Verghese,et al.  Applications of a class of nonlinear filters to problems in power electronics , 1990, 21st Annual IEEE Conference on Power Electronics Specialists.

[15]  R.V. White,et al.  Understanding and using PMBus/spl trade/ data formats , 2006, Twenty-First Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2006. APEC '06..