Mechanistic insights into the benefits of multisite pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy: The importance of electrical substrate and rate of left ventricular activation.

BACKGROUND Multisite pacing (MSP) of the left ventricle is proposed as an alternative to conventional single-site LV pacing in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Reports on the benefits of MSP have been conflicting. A paradigm whereby not all patients derive benefit from MSP is emerging. OBJECTIVE We sought to compare the hemodynamic and electrical effects of MSP with the aim of identifying a subgroup of patients more likely to derive benefit from MSP. METHODS Sixteen patients with implanted CRT systems incorporating a quadripolar LV pacing lead were studied. Invasive hemodynamic and electroanatomic assessment was performed during the following rhythms: baseline (non-CRT); biventricular (BIV) pacing delivered via the implanted CRT system (BIV(implanted)); BIV pacing delivered via an alternative temporary LV lead (BIV(alternative)); dual-vein MSP delivered via 2 LV leads; MultiPoint Pacing delivered via 2 vectors of the quadripolar LV lead. RESULTS Seven patients had an acute hemodynamic response (AHR) of <10% over baseline rhythm with BIV(implanted) and were deemed nonresponders. AHR in responders vs nonresponders was 21.4% ± 10.4% vs 2.0% ± 5.2% (P < .001). In responders, neither form of MSP provided incremental hemodynamic benefit over BIV(implanted). Dual-vein MSP (8.8% ± 5.7%; P = .036 vs BIV(implanted)) and MultiPoint Pacing (10.0% ± 12.2%; P = .064 vs BIV(implanted)) both improved AHR in nonresponders. Seven of 9 responders to BIV(implanted) had LV endocardial activation characterized by a functional line of block during intrinsic rhythm that was abolished with BIV pacing. All these patients met strict criteria for left bundle branch block (LBBB). No nonresponders exhibited this line of block or met strict criteria for LBBB. CONCLUSION Patients not meeting strict criteria for LBBB appear most likely to derive benefit from MSP.

[1]  Stuart P. Rosenberg,et al.  A comparison of left ventricular endocardial, multisite, and multipolar epicardial cardiac resynchronization: an acute haemodynamic and electroanatomical study. , 2014, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[2]  Frits W. Prinzen,et al.  Transseptal Conduction as an Important Determinant for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy, as Revealed by Extensive Electrical Mapping in the Dyssynchronous Canine Heart , 2013, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[3]  J. Daubert,et al.  The effect of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in heart failure. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[4]  Angelo Auricchio,et al.  Characterization of Left Ventricular Activation in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle-Branch Block , 2004, Circulation.

[5]  Reza Razavi,et al.  Delayed Trans-Septal Activation Results in Comparable Hemodynamic Effect of Left Ventricular and Biventricular Endocardial Pacing: Insights From Electroanatomical Mapping , 2014, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[6]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Multipoint left ventricular pacing improves acute hemodynamic response assessed with pressure-volume loops in cardiac resynchronization therapy patients. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[7]  William T. Abraham,et al.  Cardiac-Resynchronization Therapy in Heart Failure with a Narrow QRS Complex , 2013 .

[8]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  A review of multisite pacing to achieve cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2015, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[9]  Alex Pui-Wai Lee,et al.  Benefits of cardiac resynchronization therapy for heart failure patients with narrow QRS complexes and coexisting systolic asynchrony by echocardiography. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  S. Ficili,et al.  Long-term effectiveness of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with refractory heart failure and "narrow" QRS. , 2003, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[11]  David G Strauss,et al.  Defining left bundle branch block in the era of cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[12]  A. Michelucci,et al.  Dual-site left ventricular cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2008, The American journal of cardiology.

[13]  F. Bracke,et al.  Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Single‐ and Dual‐Site Left Ventricular Pacing Employing a Dual Cathodal Coronary Sinus Lead , 2015, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[14]  M. Ginks,et al.  Invasive acute hemodynamic response to guide left ventricular lead implantation predicts chronic remodeling in patients undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  C. Leclercq,et al.  Improvement in acute contractility and hemodynamics with multipoint pacing via a left ventricular quadripolar pacing lead , 2014, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[16]  M. Link,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update of the 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. , 2012, Heart rhythm.

[17]  A. Ducharme,et al.  Left Ventricular Versus Simultaneous Biventricular Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and a QRS Complex ≥120 Milliseconds , 2011, Circulation.

[18]  P. Tchou,et al.  Cardiac-resynchronization therapy in heart failure with narrow QRS complexes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Christophe Leclercq,et al.  A randomized comparison of triple-site versus dual-site ventricular stimulation in patients with congestive heart failure. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[20]  P. Lambiase,et al.  A randomized double‐blind crossover trial of triventricular versus biventricular pacing in heart failure , 2012, European journal of heart failure.

[21]  J. Spinelli,et al.  Cardiac pacing in heart failure patients with left bundle branch block: impact of pacing site for optimizing left ventricular resynchronization. , 2000, Italian heart journal : official journal of the Italian Federation of Cardiology.

[22]  D. Delurgio,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization in chronic heart failure. , 2002, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Mark A Hlatky,et al.  2012 ACCF/AHA/HRS focused update incorporated into the ACCF/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines and the Heart Rhythm Society. , 2013, Circulation.

[24]  Sylvain Ploux,et al.  Acute electrical and hemodynamic effects of multisite left ventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy in the dyssynchronous canine heart. , 2014, Heart rhythm.

[25]  M. Ginks,et al.  Limitations of chronic delivery of multi-vein left ventricular stimulation for cardiac resynchronization therapy , 2015, Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.

[26]  Kawal S. Rhode,et al.  Benefits of Endocardial and Multisite Pacing Are Dependent on the Type of Left Ventricular Electric Activation Pattern and Presence of Ischemic Heart Disease: Insights from Electroanatomic Mapping , 2012, Circulation. Arrhythmia and electrophysiology.

[27]  G Plank,et al.  Biophysical Modeling to Simulate the Response to Multisite Left Ventricular Stimulation Using a Quadripolar Pacing Lead , 2012, Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE.

[28]  P. Khairy,et al.  Acute haemodynamic comparison of multisite and biventricular pacing with a quadripolar left ventricular lead. , 2013, Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology.

[29]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with a narrow QRS complex. , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  L. Tavazzi,et al.  Multipoint Left Ventricular Pacing in a Single Coronary Sinus Branch Improves Mid‐Term Echocardiographic and Clinical Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy , 2015, Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology.

[31]  Reza Razavi,et al.  Cardiac magnetic resonance-derived anatomy, scar, and dyssynchrony fused with fluoroscopy to guide LV lead placement in cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comparison with acute haemodynamic measures and echocardiographic reverse remodelling. , 2013, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[32]  N. Pijls,et al.  The hemodynamic effect of intrinsic conduction during left ventricular pacing as compared to biventricular pacing. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.