How Does the Order of Viewing Two Computer Animations of the Same Oxidation-Reduction Reaction Affect Students’ Particulate-Level Explanations?

[1]  Investigating the effect of complexity factors in gas law problems , 2012 .

[2]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Using animations and visual cueing to support learning of scientific concepts and processes , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[3]  A. Johnstone.  Chemistry Teaching - Science or Alchemy? 1996 Brasted Lecture , 1997 .

[4]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  The development of chemistry teaching: a changing response to changing demand , 1993 .

[5]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Using a Computer Animation To Improve Students' Conceptual Understanding of a Can-Crushing Demonstration. , 2000 .

[6]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  Investigating Students' Ability to Transfer Ideas Learned from Molecular Animations of the Dissolution Process. , 2008 .

[7]  Joan K. Gallini,et al.  When Is an Illustration Worth Ten Thousand Words , 1990 .

[8]  B. Homer,et al.  Optimizing cognitive load for learning from computer-based science simulations , 2006 .

[9]  Vickie M. Williamson.  Teaching Chemistry with Visualizations: What's the Research Evidence? , 2011 .

[10]  Arlene A. Russell.  Symposium on Systemic Reform in Chemistry , 1997 .

[11]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: The Promise of Multimedia Learning , 2001 .

[12]  Mansoor Niaz.  The Relationship between M-Demand, Algorithms, and Problem Solving: A Neo-Piagetian Analysis. , 1989 .

[13]  Dorothy L. Gabel,et al.  Improving Teaching and Learning through Chemistry Education Research: A Look to the Future , 1999 .

[14]  Deborah P. Rosenthal,et al.  Student misinterpretations and misconceptions based on their explanations of two computer animations of varying complexity depicting the same oxidation–reduction reaction , 2012 .

[15]  Thomas J. Greenbowe,et al.  Developing and using conceptual computer animations for chemistry instruction , 1998 .

[16]  Mary B. Nakhleh,et al.  University students' conceptions of bonding in melting and dissolving phenomena , 2011 .

[17]  Roy Tasker,et al.  Research into practice: visualisation of the molecular world using animations , 2006 .

[18]  P. Shah,et al.  Exploring visuospatial thinking in chemistry learning , 2004 .

[19]  A. H. Johnstone,et al.  You Can’t Get There from Here1 , 2010 .

[20]  Bill Butts,et al.  HSC chemistry students' understanding of the structure and properties of molecular and ionic compounds , 1987 .

[21]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Can Computer Animations Affect College Biology Students' Conceptions About Diffusion & Osmosis? , 2001 .

[22]  Roy Tasker,et al.  Visualizing the Molecular World – Design, Evaluation, and Use of Animations , 2008 .

[23]  Eric N. Wiebe,et al.  Visual Representations of DNA Replication: Middle Grades Students’ Perceptions and Interpretations , 2005 .

[24]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  Using Computer-Based Visualization Strategies to Improve Students' Understanding of Molecular Polarity and Miscibility , 2001 .

[25]  P. Chandler,et al.  Learning and understanding science instructional material. , 2003 .

[26]  Loretta L. Jones,et al.  Exploring How Different Features of Animations of Sodium Chloride Dissolution Affect Students’ Explanations , 2007 .

[27]  Roberto Ma. Gregorius,et al.  Can Animations Effectively Substitute for Traditional Teaching Methods? Part I: Preparation and Testing of Materials , 2010 .

[28]  Mansoor Niaz,et al.  Manipulation of M Demand of Chemistry Problems and its Effect on Student Performance: A Neo-Piagetian Study. , 1988 .

[29]  Michael R. Abraham,et al.  The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college chemistry students , 1995 .

[30]  Roy Tasker,et al.  The Effect of Viewing Order of Macroscopic and Particulate Visualizations on Students’ Particulate Explanations , 2012 .

[31]  Kimberly Jo Smith,et al.  Evaluating Student Understanding of Solution Chemistry through Microscopic Representations , 1996 .

[32]  D. Ardaç,et al.  Effectiveness of multimedia-based instruction that emphasizes molecular representations on students' understanding of chemical change , 2004 .

[33]  Vicente A Talanquer,et al.  Macro, Submicro, and Symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “triplet” , 2011 .

[34]  Roberto Ma. Gregorius,et al.  Can animations effectively substitute for traditional teaching methods? Part II: Potential for differentiated learning , 2010 .

[35]  Robert B. Kozma,et al.  Use of Simultaneous-Synchronized Macroscopic, Microscopic, and Symbolic Representations To Enhance the Teaching and Learning of Chemical Concepts , 1997 .

[36]  Dawn Rickey,et al.  Effectiveness of a MORE Laboratory Module in Prompting Students To Revise Their Molecular-Level Ideas about Solutions , 2007 .

[37]  Michael J. Sanger,et al.  "Concept Learning versus Problem Solving": Does Particle Motion Have an Effect?. , 2007 .

[38]  Georgios Tsaparlis,et al.  Atomic and Molecular Structure in Chemical Education: A Critical Analysis from Various Perspectives of Science Education. , 1997 .

[39]  Roy Tasker,et al.  The Use of Video Demonstrations and Particulate Animation in General Chemistry , 2004 .

[40]  Xiufeng Liu,et al.  Progression in children's understanding of the matter concept from elementary to high school , 2006 .

[41]  Hong Kwen Boo,et al.  Students' Understandings of Chemical Bonds and the Energetics of Chemical Reactions. , 1998 .