Utility and Limitation of Cumulative Stone Diameter in Predicting Urinary Stone Burden at Flexible Ureteroscopy with Holmium Laser Lithotripsy: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose To retrospectively assess the clinical utility in ureteroscopy (URS) planning of cumulative stone diameter (CSD), which does not account for stone width or depth, as a predictor of URS outcome and compare it with stone volume. Materials and Methods Patients with renal stones treated at a single institute by flexible URS were retrospectively evaluated. To assess the clinical utility of CSD, relationships between stone-free (SF) status and stone burden (CSD and volume) were analyzed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics (AUROC) curve. To identify stone number impact on CSD, the AUROC of CSD divided by stone number was evaluated. Correlation coefficients of CSD and stone volume were also calculated for groups by stone number. Results In cases with CSD <20.0 mm, CSD and stone volume revealed equal ability to predict SF status. In cases with CSD ≥20.0 mm, stone volume showed higher predictive ability. The ROC curves for cases with ≥4 stones showed that CSD was less predictive of SF status than stone volume. The correlation coefficients of CSD and stone volume by stone number were 0.922 for 1 stone, 0.900 for 2–3 stones, and 0.661 for ≥4 stones. Conclusions In cases with CSD ≥20.0 mm or ≥4 stones, we should evaluate stone volume for a more predictive stone burden, and pretreatment non-contrast CT seems sufficient. In cases with CSD <20.0 mm or 1–3 stones, CSD was as valid a predictor of preoperative stone burden as stone volume, so preoperative kidney-ureter-bladder (KUB) films may be sufficient.

[1]  M. Yao,et al.  The most reliable preoperative assessment of renal stone burden as a predictor of stone-free status after flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. , 2012, Urology.

[2]  M. Yao,et al.  Predictive value of attenuation coefficients measured as Hounsfield units on noncontrast computed tomography during flexible ureteroscopy with holmium laser lithotripsy: a single-center experience. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[3]  E. Hyams,et al.  Heterogeneity in the reporting of disease characteristics and treatment outcomes in studies evaluating treatments for nephrolithiasis. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[4]  Julie M. Riley,et al.  Retrograde ureteroscopy for renal stones larger than 2.5 cm. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[5]  J. Leppert,et al.  Flexible ureteroscopy and laser lithotripsy for multiple unilateral intrarenal stones. , 2009, European urology.

[6]  D. Sahani,et al.  Computerized tomography magnified bone windows are superior to standard soft tissue windows for accurate measurement of stone size: an in vitro and clinical study. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[7]  A. Mariani Combined electrohydraulic and holmium: YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (>2 cm) renal calculi , 2008, Indian journal of urology : IJU : journal of the Urological Society of India.

[8]  A. C. Buck,et al.  2007 Guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. , 2007, European urology.

[9]  Kemal Sarica,et al.  2007 guideline for the management of ureteral calculi. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[10]  Anthony Costello,et al.  Renal tract calculi: comparison of stone size on plain radiography and noncontrast spiral CT scan. , 2006, Journal of endourology.

[11]  Viv Bewick,et al.  Statistics review 13: Receiver operating characteristic curves , 2004, Critical care.

[12]  M. Pearle Urinary stone size: comparison of abdominal plain radiography and noncontrast CT measurements. , 2004, International braz j urol : official journal of the Brazilian Society of Urology.

[13]  R. Clayman,et al.  Comparison of helical computerized tomography and plain radiography for estimating urinary stone size. , 2002, The Journal of urology.

[14]  H. Tiselius,et al.  Guidelines on Urolithiasis1 , 2001, European Urology.

[15]  K. Foo,et al.  Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy for selected staghorn stones. , 1995, Singapore medical journal.

[16]  J. Lingeman,et al.  Staghorn calculi: analysis of treatment results between initial percutaneous nephrostolithotomy and extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy monotherapy with reference to surface area. , 1992, The Journal of urology.

[17]  A. Mariani Combined electrohydraulic and holmium:YAG laser ureteroscopic nephrolithotripsy of large (greater than 4 cm) renal calculi. , 2007, The Journal of urology.

[18]  M. Gallucci,et al.  European Association of Urology GUIDELINES ON UROLITHIASIS , 2004 .