A panel cointegration analysis of CO2 emissions, nuclear energy and income in major nuclear generating countries

A number of studies have examined the effect of nuclear energy on CO2 emissions, and a lot has been learned from these studies. Due to their weaknesses in modeling approaches and variable uses, however, properly constructed and comprehensive analyses are limited. The main objective of this study is thus to contribute to the debate over nuclear energy and the environment with an enhanced model and variables. For this, a panel cointegration analysis is applied to quantify the effects of nuclear energy, energy consumption and income on CO2 emissions in 12 major nuclear generating countries. The results show that nuclear energy tends to reduce CO2 emissions. It is also found that CO2 emissions tend to decrease monotonically with income growth, providing no evidence in support of the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for CO2 emissions.

[1]  H. Iwata,et al.  Empirical study on the determinants of CO2 emissions: evidence from OECD countries , 2012 .

[2]  S. Kuznets.  Economic Growth and Income Inequality , 2019, The Gap between Rich and Poor.

[3]  Ramazan Sarı,et al.  Energy consumption, economic growth, and carbon emissions: Challenges faced by an EU candidate member , 2009 .

[4]  B. Ewing,et al.  Energy consumption, income, and carbon emissions in the United States , 2007 .

[5]  M. Pesaran,et al.  Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels , 2003 .

[6]  Peter Pedroni,et al.  Purchasing Power Parity Tests in Cointegrated Panels , 2001, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[7]  Jungho Baek,et al.  On the income–nuclear energy–CO2 emissions nexus revisited , 2014 .

[8]  R. Kaufmann,et al.  Is there a turning point in the relationship between income and energy use and/or carbon emissions? , 2006 .

[9]  Keisuke Okada,et al.  Empirical Study on the Environmental Kuznets Curve for CO2 in France: The Role of Nuclear Energy , 2010 .

[10]  Chihwa Kao,et al.  Spurious Regression and Residual-Based Tests for Cointegration in Panel Data When the Cross-Section and Time-Series Dimensions are Comparable , 1996 .

[11]  P. Pedroni.  Current Version : July 25 , 1999 CRITICAL VALUES FOR COINTEGRATION TESTS IN HETEROGENEOUS PANELS WITH MULTIPLE REGRESSORS * , 1999 .

[12]  Min-Hsien Chiang,et al.  On the Estimation and Inference of a Cointegrated Regression in Panel Data , 1997 .

[13]  Andrew T. Levin,et al.  Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties , 2002 .

[14]  Nicholas Apergis,et al.  CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America , 2009 .

[15]  Xuemei Liu.  Explaining the relationship between CO2 emissions and national income--The role of energy consumption , 2005 .

[16]  S. M Rashad,et al.  Nuclear power and the environment: comparative assessment of environmental and health impacts of electricity-generating systems , 2000 .

[17]  G. Grossman,et al.  Economic Growth and the Environment , 1994 .

[18]  Jungho Baek,et al.  Is economic growth good or bad for the environment? Empirical evidence from Korea , 2013 .

[19]  Jungho Baek,et al.  Trade Liberalization, Economic Growth, Energy Consumption and the Environment: Time Series Evidence from G-20 Economies , 2010 .

[20]  Bin Su,et al.  Life cycle analysis on carbon emissions from power generation – The nuclear energy example , 2014 .

[21]  Peter Pedroni,et al.  Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels , 2001 .

[22]  A. Jalil,et al.  Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China , 2009 .

[23]  H. Iwata,et al.  A note on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2: A pooled mean group approach , 2011 .

[24]  Xingping Zhang,et al.  Energy consumption, carbon emissions, and economic growth in China , 2009 .

[25]  Jeffrey M. Wooldridge,et al.  Introductory Econometrics: A Modern Approach , 1999 .

[26]  Nicholas Apergis,et al.  On the causal dynamics between emissions, nuclear energy, renewable energy, and economic growth ☆ , 2010 .

[27]  Jörg Breitung,et al.  The local power of some unit root tests for panel data , 1999 .

[28]  V. Grimm,et al.  Sequential versus Bundle Auctions for Recurring Procurement , 2007 .

[29]  P. Gil.  Animal spirits and the composition of innovation in a lab-equipment R&D model with transition , 2009 .

[30]  Ferda Halicioğlu,et al.  An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey , 2009 .