Three-body wear of dental resin composites reinforced with silica-fused whiskers.

OBJECTIVE Recent studies used silica-fused whiskers to increase the strength and toughness of resin composites. This study investigated the three-body wear of whisker composites. It was hypothesized that the whisker composites would be more wear resistant than composites reinforced with fine glass particles, and the whisker-to-silica filler ratio would significantly affect wear. METHODS Silica particles were mixed with silicon nitride whiskers at seven different whisker/(whisker + silica) mass fractions (%): 0, 16.7, 33.3, 50, 66.7, 83.3, and 100. Each mixture was heated at 800 degrees C to fuse the silica particles onto the whiskers. Each powder was then silanized and incorporated into a dental resin to make the wear specimens. A four-station wear machine was used with specimens immersed in a slurry containing polymethyl methacrylate beads, and a steel pin was loaded and rotated against the specimen at a maximum load of 76 N. RESULTS Whisker-to-silica ratio had significant effects (one-way ANOVA; p < 0.001) on wear. After 4 x 10(5) wear cycles, the whisker composite at whisker/(whisker + silica) of 16.7% had a wear scar diameter (mean +/- sd; n = 6) of (643 +/- 39) microm and a wear depth of (82 +/- 19) microm, significantly less than a wear scar diameter of (1184 +/- 34) microm and a wear depth of (173 +/- 15) microm of a commercial prosthetic composite reinforced with fine glass particles (Tukey's multiple comparison). SEM examination revealed that, instead of whiskers protruding from the worn surface, the whiskers were worn with the composite surface, resulting in relatively smooth wear surfaces. SIGNIFICANCE Silica-fused whisker reinforcement produced dental resin composites that exhibited high resistance to wear with smooth wear surfaces. These properties, together with the strength and fracture toughness being twice those of current glass particle-reinforced composites, may help extend the use of resin composite to large stress-bearing posterior restorations.

[1]  Jack L Ferracane,et al.  Effect of filler fraction and filler surface treatment on wear of microfilled composites. , 2002, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  D C Watts,et al.  Intrinsic 'soft-start' polymerisation shrinkage-kinetics in an acrylate-based resin-composite. , 1999, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[3]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Mechanical properties of heat treated restorative resins for use in the inlay/onlay technique. , 1990, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[4]  G. Schuster,et al.  Effect of Heating Delay on Conversion and Strength of a Post-cured Resin Composite , 1998, Journal of dental research.

[5]  R. V. van Duinen,et al.  Early and Long-term Wear of Conventional and Resin-modified Glass Ionomers , 1996, Journal of dental research.

[6]  H. Xu,et al.  Dental Composite Resins Containing Silica-fused Ceramic Single-crystalline Whiskers with Various Filler Levels , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[7]  C. Davidson,et al.  Effect of Abrasion Medium on Wear of Stress-bearing Composites and Amalgam in vitro , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[8]  M. Jensen,et al.  A clinical comparison of resin composite inlay and onlay posterior restorations and cast-gold restorations at 7 years. , 1999, Quintessence international.

[9]  J L Ferracane,et al.  Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[10]  J. Antonucci,et al.  Effect of thermal cycling on whisker-reinforced dental resin composites , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[11]  A. Peutzfeldt,et al.  Modulus of resilience as predictor for clinical wear of restorative resins. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[12]  R. Wassell,et al.  A Two-body Frictional Wear Test , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[13]  F C Eichmiller,et al.  Dental resin composites containing ceramic whiskers and precured glass ionomer particles. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[14]  J. Quinn,et al.  Effects of different whiskers on the reinforcement of dental resin composites. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[15]  G. Christensen Porcelain-fused-to-metal vs. nonmetal crowns. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[16]  W. Douglas,et al.  The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. , 1986, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[17]  J L Ferracane,et al.  In vitro Wear of Composite with Varied Cure, Filler Level, and Filler Treatment , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[18]  W. Krause,et al.  Mechanical properties of BIS-GMA resin short glass fiber composites. , 1989, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[19]  S C Bayne,et al.  Protection hypothesis for composite wear. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  R. DeLong,et al.  An artificial oral environment for testing dental materials , 1991, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  C. Cox,et al.  Evaluating the antagonistic wear of restorative materials when placed against human enamel. , 1996, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[22]  R L Erickson,et al.  The Influence of Admixing Microfiller to Small-particle Composite Resin on Wear, Tensile Strength, Hardness, and Surface Roughness , 1989, Journal of dental research.

[23]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Wear and Marginal Breakdown of Composites with Various Degrees of Cure , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[24]  M. Tyas Correlation between fracture properties and clinical performance of composite resins in Class IV cavities. , 1990, Australian dental journal.

[25]  J. Quinn,et al.  Effects of Whisker-to-Silica Ratio on the Reinforcement of Dental Resin Composites with Silica-fused Whiskers , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[26]  W H Douglas,et al.  A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[27]  K. T. Ritchie,et al.  Short‐Crack Toughness and Abrasive Machining of Silicon Nitride , 1996 .

[28]  J. Antonucci,et al.  Ceramic Whisker Reinforcement of Dental Resin Composites , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[29]  S. Bayne Mechanical property analysis of two admixed PRIMM-modified commercial dental composites (abstract) , 1996 .

[30]  R. Bowen Properties of a silica-reinforced polymer for dental restorations. , 1963, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[31]  A. Giuseppetti,et al.  Three-body Wear of a Hand-consolidated Silver Alternative to Amalgam , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[32]  J L Ferracane,et al.  Evaluation of composite wear with a new multi-mode oral wear simulator. , 1996, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[33]  Wendt Sl The effect of heat used as a secondary cure upon the physical properties of three composite resins. I. Diametral tensile strength, compressive strength, and marginal dimensional stability. , 1987 .

[34]  K. Leinfelder,et al.  In vitro wear device for determining posterior composite wear. , 1999, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[35]  J. Ferracane,et al.  In vitro aging of dental composites in water--effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[36]  K. Kawai,et al.  In vitro evaluation of OCA wear resistance of posterior composites. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[37]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Occlusal abrasion of a composite restorative resin with ultra-fine filler--an initial study. , 1978, Quintessence international, dental digest.