Conflict Mediation in Human-Machine Teaming: Using a Virtual Agent to Support Mission Planning and Debriefing

Socially intelligent artificial agents and robots are anticipated to become ubiquitous in home, work, and military environments. With the addition of such agents to human teams it is crucial to evaluate their role in the planning, decision making, and conflict mediation processes. We conducted a study to evaluate the utility of a virtual agent that provided mission planning support in a three-person human team during a military strategic mission planning scenario. The team consisted of a human team lead who made the final decisions and three supporting roles, two humans and the artificial agent. The mission outcome was experimentally designed to fail and introduced a conflict between the human team members and the leader. This conflict was mediated by the artificial agent during the debriefing process through discuss or debate and open communication strategies of conflict resolution [1]. Our results showed that our teams experienced conflict. The teams also responded socially to the virtual agent, although they did not find the agent beneficial to the mediation process. Finally, teams collaborated well together and perceived task proficiency increased for team leaders. Socially intelligent agents show potential for conflict mediation, but need careful design and implementation to improve team processes and collaboration.

[1]  Petr Slovák,et al.  “Stop. I See a Conflict Happening.” A Robot Mediator for Young Children’s Interpersonal Conflict Resolution , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[2]  Louis-Philippe Morency,et al.  It's only a computer: Virtual humans increase willingness to disclose , 2014, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[3]  Ginevra Castellano,et al.  Empathic Robot for Group Learning , 2019, ACM Transactions on Human-Robot Interaction.

[4]  David DeVault,et al.  Negotiation as a Challenge Problem for Virtual Humans , 2015, IVA.

[5]  Wendy Ju,et al.  Tell me more designing HRI to encourage more trust, disclosure, and companionship , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  FFAB—The Form Function Attribution Bias in Human–Robot Interaction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.

[7]  Stefan Kopp,et al.  A Second Chance to Make a First Impression? How Appearance and Nonverbal Behavior Affect Perceived Warmth and Competence of Virtual Agents over Time , 2012, IVA.

[8]  Clifford Nass,et al.  Computers are social actors , 1994, CHI '94.

[9]  Kallirroi Georgila,et al.  SimSensei kiosk: a virtual human interviewer for healthcare decision support , 2014, AAMAS.

[10]  David R. Traum,et al.  What Kind of Stories Should a Virtual Human Swap? , 2016, IVA.

[11]  E. Mannix,et al.  The critical role of conflict resolution in teams: a close look at the links between conflict type, conflict management strategies, and team outcomes. , 2008, The Journal of applied psychology.

[12]  Roderick M. Kramer,et al.  Swift trust and temporary groups. , 1996 .

[13]  Samuel S. Monfort,et al.  Almost human: Anthropomorphism increases trust resilience in cognitive agents. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[14]  Brian Scassellati,et al.  The Ripple Effects of Vulnerability: The Effects of a Robot’s Vulnerable Behavior on Trust in Human-Robot Teams , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[15]  Haydn Jones,et al.  All together now , 1995 .

[16]  Malte F. Jung.  Affective Grounding in Human-Robot Interaction , 2017, 2017 12th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI.

[17]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Using Robots to Moderate Team Conflict: The Case of Repairing Violations , 2015, 2015 10th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[18]  Solace Shen,et al.  Micbot: A Peripheral Robotic Object to Shape Conversational Dynamics and Team Performance , 2019, 2019 14th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[19]  Dana Kulic,et al.  Measurement Instruments for the Anthropomorphism, Animacy, Likeability, Perceived Intelligence, and Perceived Safety of Robots , 2009, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[20]  Xuan Zhao,et al.  What is Human-like?: Decomposing Robots’ Human-like Appearance Using the Anthropomorphic roBOT (ABOT) Database , 2018, 2018 13th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[21]  Fred D. Davis.  Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..