Effects of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on speech production in children with autism: a systematic review.

PURPOSE This systematic review aimed to determine the effects of augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) intervention on speech production in children with autism or pervasive developmental disorder-not otherwise specified. METHOD A systematic review methodology was utilized to limit bias in searching, selecting, coding, and synthesizing relevant treatment studies. This involved a multifaceted search for studies written between 1975 and May 2007 using various bibliographic databases, dissertation databases, hand searches of selected journals and published compilations of AAC theses and dissertations, and ancestry searches. To be included, studies had to meet stringent criteria. A coding manual and form facilitated data extraction in terms of participant characteristics, treatment characteristics, design and measurement, and outcomes. RESULTS Nine single-subject experimental design (27 participants) and 2 group studies (98 participants) were included. Results indicated that AAC interventions do not impede speech production. In fact, most studies reported an increase in speech production. However, in-depth analyses revealed that the gains were rather modest. CONCLUSIONS Although AAC interventions do not appear to impede speech production and may result in increased speech production, the modest gains observed require realistic expectations among clinicians and other stakeholders. Future research should be more hypothesis driven and aim to identify predictive child characteristics, such as prior speech imitation and object exploration skills.

[1]  D. Reid,et al.  Effects of Manual Signing on Communicative Verbalizations by Toddlers with and without Disabilities in Inclusive Classrooms , 2001 .

[2]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Toward Functional Augmentative and Alternative Communication for Students With Autism: Manual Signs, Graphic Symbols, and Voice Output Communication Aids. , 2003, Language, speech, and hearing services in schools.

[3]  Tonya N. Davis,et al.  The Effects of Enhanced Milieu Teaching and a Voice Output Communication Aid on the Requesting of Three Children with Autism , 2007, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[4]  Ilene S. Schwartz,et al.  The Picture Exchange Communication System , 1998 .

[5]  S. R. Mathur,et al.  Right Reason in the Integration of Group and Single-Subject Research in Behavioral Disorders , 2000 .

[6]  Teaching Verbal Behavior Using the Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) With Children With Autistic Spectrum Disorders , 2006 .

[7]  M. Tincani Effects of selection-based versus topography-based communication training on the acquisition of mands by children with autism and multiple disabilities , 2002 .

[8]  M. O'Reilly,et al.  Comparing two types of augmentative and alternative communication systems for children with autism , 2006, Pediatric rehabilitation.

[9]  Tony Charman,et al.  The effectiveness of Picture Exchange Communication System (PECS) training for teachers of children with autism: a pragmatic, group randomised controlled trial. , 2007, Journal of child psychology and psychiatry, and allied disciplines.

[10]  Helen Arvidson,et al.  Augmentative and Alternative Communication: A Handbook of Principles and Practices , 1997 .

[11]  Susan Marie Ferrara Voice output communication aids or picture communication system: The efficient way for individuals with severe disabilities to acquire communication , 2005 .

[12]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Effects of Synthetic Speech Output on Requesting and Natural Speech Production in Children with Autism: A Preliminary Study. , 2007 .

[13]  R. Schlosser,et al.  Use of information-seeking strategies for developing systematic reviews and engaging in evidence-based practice: the application of traditional and comprehensive Pearl Growing. A review. , 2006, International journal of language & communication disorders.

[14]  Howard D. White,et al.  SCIENTIFIC COMMUNICATION AND LITERATURE RETRIEVAL , 2019, The Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis.

[15]  P. Yoder,et al.  Speech following sign language training in autistic children with minimal verbal language , 1988, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[16]  E. Fombonne The prevalence of autism. , 2003, JAMA.

[17]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Augmentative and alternative communication: Knowledge and skills for service delivery , 2002 .

[18]  Jean Kerr,et al.  Augmentative Communication and Literacy: the SAIL Kit Approach , 1998 .

[19]  Jacob Cohen Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[20]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[21]  L. Hedges,et al.  The Handbook of Research Synthesis , 1995 .

[22]  Janet Felce,et al.  The Effects of PECS Teaching to Phase III on the Communicative Interactions between Children with Autism and their Teachers , 2007, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[23]  Ralf W Schlosser,et al.  The impact of augmentative and alternative communication intervention on the speech production of individuals with developmental disabilities: a research review. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[24]  D. Carr,et al.  “Brief Report: Increase in Production of Spoken Words in Some Children with Autism after PECS Teaching to Phase III” , 2007, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[25]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Not all systematic reviews are created equal: Considerations for appraisal , 2007 .

[26]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Searching for evidence in augmentative and alternative communication: Navigating a scattered literature , 2005 .

[27]  D. Scott,et al.  The development of language. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[28]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Selecting graphic symbols for an initial request lexicon: integrative review , 2002 .

[29]  M. Granlund,et al.  Efficacy of communication intervention for presymbolic communicators , 1999 .

[30]  J. Ganz,et al.  The impact of the Picture Exchange Communication System on requesting and speech development in preschoolers with autism spectrum disorders and similar characteristics , 2008 .

[31]  Matt Tincani,et al.  The Picture Exchange Communication System: Effects on Manding and Speech Development for School-Aged , 2006 .

[32]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  The Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1987 .

[33]  R. Paul Promoting social communication in high functioning individuals with autistic spectrum disorders. , 2003, Child and adolescent psychiatric clinics of North America.

[34]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Early Intervention for Children with Conduct Disorders: A Quantitative Synthesis of Single-Subject Research , 1986 .

[35]  P. Mirenda,et al.  Speech-language pathologists' roles in the delivery of positive behavior support for individuals with developmental disabilities. , 2004, American journal of speech-language pathology.

[36]  Lori Frost,et al.  The picture exchange communication system : training manual , 2002 .

[37]  L. LeBlanc,et al.  Using the picture exchange communication system (PECS) with children with autism: assessment of PECS acquisition, speech, social-communicative behavior, and problem behavior. , 2002, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[38]  Jeff Sigafoos,et al.  Conditional Use of Aided and Unaided AAC , 2001 .

[39]  Bill Potter,et al.  A Review of Studies Examining the Nature of Selection-based and Topography-based Verbal Behavior , 1997, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[40]  J. Michael Verbal behavior. , 1984, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[41]  T. Scruggs Advances in Learning and Behavioral Disabilities , 1992 .

[42]  Barry M. Prizant,et al.  Autism spectrum disorders : a transactional developmental perspective , 2000 .

[43]  P. Lachenbruch Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .

[44]  R. Schlosser,et al.  Effects of Symbol, Referent, and Instructional Variables on the Acquisition of Aided and Unaided Symbols by Individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders , 2001 .

[45]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  Is There a Role for Speech Output in Interventions for Persons with Autism? , 2001 .

[46]  Nirbhay N. Singh,et al.  PECS and VOCAs to enable students with developmental disabilities to make requests: an overview of the literature. , 2007, Research in developmental disabilities.

[47]  T. L. Layton,et al.  Language training with autistic children using four different modes of presentation. , 1988, Journal of communication disorders.

[48]  Carl L. Parsons,et al.  The Effect of Computers with Synthesized Speech and No Speech on the Spontaneous Communication of Children with Autism , 1993 .

[49]  Mark W. Lipsey,et al.  Practical Meta-Analysis , 2000 .

[50]  M. Sundberg Selecting a response form for nonverbal persons: Facilitated communication, pointing systems, or sign language? , 1993, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[51]  H. Goldstein Communication Intervention for Children with Autism: A Review of Treatment Efficacy , 2002, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[52]  Julia B. Stoner,et al.  The Effectiveness of the Picture Exchange Communication System with Nonspeaking Adults , 2006 .

[53]  J. Michael,et al.  The Benefits of Skinner’s Analysis of Verbal Behavior for Children with Autism , 2001, Behavior modification.

[54]  DOREEN BLISCHAK,et al.  Use of Speech-Generating Devices: In Support of Natural Speech , 2003, Augmentative and alternative communication.

[55]  Pat Mirenda,et al.  Autism, Augmentative Communication, and Assistive Technology , 2001 .

[56]  M. Tincani,et al.  Comparing the Picture Exchange Communication System and Sign Language Training for Children With Autism , 2004 .

[57]  D. Bailey,et al.  Evaluating Programme Impact: Levels of Certainty , 1991 .

[58]  M. Petticrew,et al.  Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide , 2005 .

[59]  E. Carr,et al.  Acquisition of sign language by autistic children. I: Expressive labelling. , 1978, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[60]  Ralf W. Schlosser,et al.  The Efficacy of Augmentative and Alternative Communication: Toward Evidence-Based Practice , 2003 .

[61]  D H Barlow,et al.  Single-Case Experimental Designs: Uses in Applied Clinical Research , 1973 .

[62]  J. Ganz,et al.  Effects on Communicative Requesting and Speech Development of the Picture Exchange Communication System in Children with Characteristics of Autism , 2004, Journal of autism and developmental disorders.

[63]  Oliver Wendt The effectiveness of augmentative and alternative communication for individuals with autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis , 2006 .

[64]  J. Gleason The development of language , 1985 .

[65]  J. Michael,et al.  The role of automatic reinforcement in early language acquisition , 1996, The Analysis of verbal behavior.

[66]  W. Stone,et al.  A randomized comparison of the effect of two prelinguistic communication interventions on the acquisition of spoken communication in preschoolers with ASD. , 2006, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.