Frontal-midline theta reflects different mechanisms associated with proactive and reactive control of inhibition

Reactive control of response inhibition is associated with a right-lateralised cortical network, as well as frontal-midline theta (FM-theta) activity measured at the scalp. However, response inhibition is also governed by proactive control processes, and how such proactive control is reflected in FM-theta activity and associated neural source activity remains unclear. To investigate this, simultaneous recordings of electroencephalography (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data was performed while participants performed a cued stop-signal task. The cues (0%, 25% or 66%) indicated the likelihood of an upcoming stop-signal in the following trial. Results indicated that participants adjusted their behaviour proactively, with increasing go-trial reaction times following increasing stop-signal probability, as well as modulations of both go-trial and stop-trial accuracies. Target-locked theta activity was higher in stop-trials than go-trials and modulated by probability. At the single-trial level, cue-locked theta was associated with shorter reaction-times, while target-locked theta was associated with both faster reaction times and higher probability of an unsuccessful stop-trial. This dissociation was also evident at the neural source level, where a joint ICA revealed independent components related to going, stopping and proactive preparation. Overall, the results indicate that FM-theta activity can be dissociated into several mechanisms associated with proactive control, response initiation and response inhibition processes. We propose that FM-theta activity reflects both heightened preparation of the motor control network, as well as stopping-related processes associated with a right lateralized cortical network.

[1]  Jan R. Wessel,et al.  Chronometric Electrical Stimulation of Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Increases Motor Braking , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  S. Tong,et al.  Attention-related modulation of frontal midline theta oscillations in cingulate cortex during a spatial cueing Go/NoGo task. , 2019, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[3]  I. Obeso,et al.  Dissociating the Role of the pre-SMA in Response Inhibition and Switching: A Combined Online and Offline TMS Approach , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[4]  G. Logan,et al.  Proactive adjustments of response strategies in the stop-signal paradigm. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[5]  Ali Mazaheri,et al.  The neural markers of an imminent failure of response inhibition , 2012, NeuroImage.

[6]  Ewald Moser,et al.  Premovement activity of the pre-supplementary motor area and the readiness for action: studies of time-resolved event-related functional MRI. , 2005, Human movement science.

[7]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Single-Trial Regression Elucidates the Role of Prefrontal Theta Oscillations in Response Conflict , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[8]  Bram B. Zandbelt,et al.  Common and unique neural networks for proactive and reactive response inhibition revealed by independent component analysis of functional MRI data , 2014, NeuroImage.

[9]  Stewart H. Mostofsky,et al.  Evidence that response inhibition is a primary deficit in ADHD , 2007, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[10]  P. Skudlarski,et al.  Brain Connectivity Related to Working Memory Performance , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  C. Li,et al.  Proactive Control: Neural Oscillatory Correlates of Conflict Anticipation and Response Slowing , 2017, eNeuro.

[12]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  How Preparation Changes the Need for Top–Down Control of the Basal Ganglia When Inhibiting Premature Actions , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  G. Logan,et al.  Response inhibition in the stop-signal paradigm , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  M. Ullsperger,et al.  Neurophysiology of performance monitoring and adaptive behavior. , 2014, Physiological reviews.

[15]  Anna Lena Biel,et al.  Be Prepared: Tune to FM-Theta for Cognitive Control , 2019, Trends in Neurosciences.

[16]  Christina F. Lavallee,et al.  Electroencephalography of response inhibition tasks: functional networks and cognitive contributions. , 2013, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[17]  Y. Miyashita,et al.  Preparation to Inhibit a Response Complements Response Inhibition during Performance of a Stop-Signal Task , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  K. Chang,et al.  Subregions within the Supplementary Motor Area Activated at Different Stages of Movement Preparation and Execution , 1999, NeuroImage.

[19]  P. Michie,et al.  Stop-signal response inhibition in schizophrenia: Behavioural, event-related potential and functional neuroimaging data , 2012, Biological Psychology.

[20]  René J. Huster,et al.  Strategy switches in proactive inhibitory control and their association with task-general and stopping-specific networks , 2019, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  J. Cavanagh,et al.  Frontal midline theta reflects anxiety and cognitive control: Meta-analytic evidence , 2015, Journal of Physiology-Paris.

[22]  Christian Beste,et al.  Pre-trial theta band activity in the ventromedial prefrontal cortex correlates with inhibition-related theta band activity in the right inferior frontal cortex , 2020, NeuroImage.

[23]  René J. Huster,et al.  A Single Mechanism for Global and Selective Response Inhibition under the Influence of Motor Preparation , 2020, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[24]  J. Cavanagh,et al.  Frontal theta accounts for individual differences in the cost of conflict on decision making , 2017, Brain Research.

[25]  G. Logan On the ability to inhibit thought and action , 1984 .

[26]  M. Fillmore,et al.  Impaired inhibitory control of behavior in chronic cocaine users. , 2002, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[27]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  Single-Trial Normalization for Event-Related Spectral Decomposition Reduces Sensitivity to Noisy Trials , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[28]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Frequency Band-Specific Electrical Brain Stimulation Modulates Cognitive Control Processes , 2015, PloS one.

[29]  A. Strafella,et al.  Testing the physiological plausibility of conflicting psychological models of response inhibition: A forward inference fMRI study , 2017, Behavioural Brain Research.

[30]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated , 2004, Brain and Cognition.

[31]  René S. Kahn,et al.  Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Functional MRI Reveal Cortical and Subcortical Interactions during Stop-signal Response Inhibition , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  S. Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  Midfrontal neural dynamics distinguish between general control and inhibition-specific processes in the stopping of motor actions , 2019, Scientific Reports.

[33]  R. Nigbur,et al.  Theta power as a marker for cognitive interference , 2011, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[34]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  Neuronal chronometry of target detection: Fusion of hemodynamic and event-related potential data , 2005, NeuroImage.

[35]  Steven G. Luke,et al.  Evaluating significance in linear mixed-effects models in R , 2016, Behavior Research Methods.

[36]  Kimberly S. Chiew,et al.  From Gating Models to Dual Mechanisms , 2016 .

[37]  Christian Beste,et al.  Demands on response inhibition processes determine modulations of theta band activity in superior frontal areas and correlations with pupillometry – Implications for the norepinephrine system during inhibitory control , 2017, NeuroImage.

[38]  Per B. Brockhoff,et al.  lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .

[39]  Christian Beste,et al.  Response mode-dependent differences in neurofunctional networks during response inhibition: an EEG-beamforming study , 2016, Brain Structure and Function.

[40]  John Duncan,et al.  The role of the right inferior frontal gyrus: inhibition and attentional control , 2010, NeuroImage.

[41]  T. Espeseth,et al.  Proactive and reactive modes of cognitive control can operate independently and simultaneously. , 2019, Acta psychologica.

[42]  R. Raedt,et al.  Preparing for hard times: Scalp and intracranial physiological signatures of proactive cognitive control. , 2019, Psychophysiology.

[43]  G. Logan,et al.  Models of response inhibition in the stop-signal and stop-change paradigms , 2009, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews.

[44]  M. Carrillo-de-la-Peña,et al.  When the brain simulates stopping: Neural activity recorded during real and imagined stop-signal tasks , 2016, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[45]  James F. Cavanagh,et al.  Frontal theta predicts specific cognitive control-induced behavioural changes beyond general reaction time slowing , 2019, NeuroImage.

[46]  E. Salinas,et al.  The Countermanding Task Revisited: Fast Stimulus Detection Is a Key Determinant of Psychophysical Performance , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[47]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Electrophysiological correlates of anterior cingulate function in a go/no-go task: Effects of response conflict and trial type frequency , 2003, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[48]  L. Granjon,et al.  The paradoxical effect of warning on reaction time: Demonstrating proactive response inhibition with event-related potentials , 2009, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[49]  T. Braver The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[50]  Yoshiharu Yamamoto,et al.  Single-trial EEG Power and Phase Dynamics Associated with Voluntary Response Inhibition , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[51]  Christina F. Lavallee,et al.  Stimulus-Response Mappings Shape Inhibition Processes: A Combined EEG-fMRI Study of Contextual Stopping , 2014, PloS one.

[52]  Hans Colonius,et al.  A consensus guide to capturing the ability to inhibit actions and impulsive behaviors in the stop-signal task , 2019, eLife.

[53]  S. Schütz-Bosbach,et al.  Proactive control without midfrontal control signals? The role of midfrontal oscillations in preparatory conflict adjustments , 2019, Biological Psychology.

[54]  Christo Pantev,et al.  Conflict and inhibition differentially affect the N200/P300 complex in a combined go/nogo and stop-signal task , 2010, NeuroImage.

[55]  J. Monterosso,et al.  Deficits in response inhibition associated with chronic methamphetamine abuse. , 2005, Drug and alcohol dependence.

[56]  Arnaud Delorme,et al.  EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis , 2004, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[57]  Geert J. M. van Boxtel,et al.  Stimulation of the Subthalamic Region Facilitates the Selection and Inhibition of Motor Responses in Parkinson's Disease , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[58]  A. Aron From Reactive to Proactive and Selective Control: Developing a Richer Model for Stopping Inappropriate Responses , 2011, Biological Psychiatry.

[59]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  Responding with Restraint: What Are the Neurocognitive Mechanisms? , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[60]  S. Eickhoff,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Three Key Regions for Supervisory Attentional Control: Evidence from Neuroimaging Meta-analyses , 2022 .

[61]  A. Wagner,et al.  Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences Cognitive Control and Right Ventrolateral Prefrontal Cortex: Reflexive Reorienting, Motor Inhibition, and Action Updating , 2022 .

[62]  John J. B. Allen,et al.  Theta lingua franca: a common mid-frontal substrate for action monitoring processes. , 2012, Psychophysiology.

[63]  Patrick S. Cooper,et al.  Frontoparietal theta oscillations during proactive control are associated with goal-updating and reduced behavioral variability , 2017, Biological Psychology.

[64]  C. Degueldre,et al.  Regional brain activity during tasks devoted to the central executive of working memory. , 1999, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[65]  Li-Wei Ko,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Inhibitory Response in a Battlefield Scenario: A Simultaneous fMRI-EEG Study , 2016, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[66]  D. Sharp,et al.  Contrasting network and modular perspectives on inhibitory control , 2015, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[67]  Frederick Verbruggen,et al.  The inhibitory control reflex , 2014, Neuropsychologia.

[68]  M. Vink,et al.  On the Role of the Striatum in Response Inhibition , 2010, PloS one.

[69]  Michael X. Cohen,et al.  Midfrontal conflict-related theta-band power reflects neural oscillations that predict behavior. , 2013, Journal of neurophysiology.

[70]  S. Swinnen,et al.  A proactive task set influences how response inhibition is implemented in the basal ganglia , 2016, Human brain mapping.

[71]  Marrit B. Zuure,et al.  Multiple Midfrontal Thetas Revealed by Source Separation of Simultaneous MEG and EEG , 2020, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[72]  M. Frank,et al.  Frontal theta as a mechanism for cognitive control , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[73]  Gordon D Logan,et al.  Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[74]  G. Knyazev,et al.  A failure to stop and attention fluctuations: An evoked oscillations study of the stop-signal paradigm , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[75]  T. Robbins,et al.  Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex: one decade on , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[76]  Eliza Congdon,et al.  Measurement and Reliability of Response Inhibition , 2012, Front. Psychology.