PLANT‐LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ORIENTATION: THE INFLUENCE OF MANAGEMENT VIEWS AND PLANT CHARACTERISTICS

As customers, the public and other stakeholders are increasingly demanding that manufacturing firms improve their approach to environmental management, some plants have moved to develop an orientation that is increasingly proactive. Synthesizing earlier research, environmental management orientation is defined here to include system analysis and planning, organizational responsibility, and management controls. The relationship between a proactive orientation and two sets of internal factors, specifically the personal views of plant managers and plant-specific characteristics, was tested using survey data from the furniture industry. The production outlook for the plant was critical, with a favorable outlook fostering a more proactive environmental management orientation. After controlling for plant-specific factors, personal views also were influential; an increasing emphasis on short-term economic value was related to a more reactive plant-level orientation. Thus senior corporate management can foster strong plant-level environmental management through a more balanced emphasis on economic and ethical values and continued investment in a plant's long-term viability.

[1]  R. Klassen,et al.  The impact of environmental management on firm performance , 1996 .

[2]  Noan Walley,et al.  It's not easy being green , 1994 .

[3]  A. Campbell,et al.  Corporate strategy: The quest for parenting advantage , 1995 .

[4]  Joseph M. Petulla Environmental Management in Industry , 1987 .

[5]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  Green and Competitive : Ending the Stalemate , 1996 .

[6]  Peter T. Ward,et al.  Research in the process and content of manufacturing strategy , 1990 .

[7]  M. Russo,et al.  A Resource-Based Perspective On Corporate Environmental Performance And Profitability , 1997 .

[8]  Vijay Sethi,et al.  Development of measures to assess the extent to which an information technology application provides competitive advantage , 1994 .

[9]  R. Bagozzi An Examination Of The Validity Of Two Models Of Attitude. , 1981, Multivariate behavioral research.

[10]  Joseph Sarkis,et al.  Manufacturing strategy and environmental consciousness , 1995 .

[11]  S. Vickery,et al.  Production Competence and Business Strategy: Do They Affect Business Performance? , 1993 .

[12]  R. Handfield,et al.  ‘Green’ value chain practices in the furniture industry , 1997 .

[13]  A. Carroll A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance , 1979 .

[14]  Arieh A. Ullmann Data in Search of a Theory: A Critical Examination of the Relationships Among Social Performance, Social Disclosure, and Economic Performance of U.S. Firms , 1985 .

[15]  William C. Frederick,et al.  The Growing Concern over Business Responsibility , 1960 .

[16]  Robert D. Klassen,et al.  Environmental Management in Operations: The Selection of Environmental Technologies* , 1999 .

[17]  Richard W. Stackman,et al.  Business-Environment Attitudes and the New Environmental Paradigm , 1991 .

[18]  Kenneth E. Aupperle,et al.  An empirical examination of the relationship between corporate so#al responsibility and profitabilit , 1985 .

[19]  Mark D. Hanna,et al.  An empirical exploration of the relationship between manufacturing strategy and environmental management: Two complementary models , 1996 .

[20]  B. W. Marguglio,et al.  Environmental management systems , 1991 .

[21]  R. Dunlap,et al.  The “New Environmental Paradigm” , 1978 .

[22]  B. Spicer,et al.  MARKET RISK, ACCOUNTING DATA AND COMPANIES’POLLUTION CONTROL RECORDS , 1978 .