Average-State Jacobians and Implicit Methods for Compressible Viscous and Turbulent Flows

Several new implicit schemes for the solution of the compressible Navier?Stokes equations are presented. These methods are derived from a hierarchy of average-state approximate solutions to the Riemann problem, ranging from the Lax?Friedrichs flux to the exact Riemann-solver flux. In contrast to linearised approximations, these methods will (with certain provisos on the signal velocities) enforce the entropy condition and preserve positivity without the need for additional corrections. The hierarchy also encompasses and explains the origin of many other upwind and centred methods, including the space-time scheme (due to Chang) and the more recent FORCE scheme (due to Toro). Based on an analysis of the above hierarchy, attention is focussed on the development of a new implicit scheme using a positivity-preserving version of Toroet al.'s HLLC scheme, which is the simplest average-state solver capable of exactly preserving isolated shock, contact, and shear waves. Solutions obtained with this method are essentially indistinguishable from those produced with an exact Riemann solver, whilst convergence to the steady state is the most rapid of all the implicit average-stage schemes considered and directly comparable to that of the unmodified Roe scheme. A new two-step implicit method is applied to various test cases, including turbulent flow with shock/boundary-layer interaction. The new time-stepping scheme is composed of two backward Euler steps, but has twice the convergence rate of the backward Euler scheme and alleviates the convergence problems that are often experienced when employing compressive limiter functions.

[1]  George N. Barakos,et al.  Implicit unfactored implementation of two‐equation turbulence models in compressible Navier–Stokes methods , 1998 .

[2]  R. Pletcher,et al.  Computational Fluid Mechanics and Heat Transfer. By D. A ANDERSON, J. C. TANNEHILL and R. H. PLETCHER. Hemisphere, 1984. 599 pp. $39.95. , 1986, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[3]  B. Launder,et al.  Application of the energy-dissipation model of turbulence to the calculation of flow near a spinning disc , 1974 .

[4]  D. Schwamborn,et al.  The DLR-F5 Wing Test Case, Contribution to "EUROVAL - An European Initiative on Validation of CFD Codes" , 1993 .

[5]  T. Kubota,et al.  A study of wakes behind a circular cylinder at m equal 5.7 , 1963 .

[6]  S. F. Davis Simplified second-order Godunov-type methods , 1988 .

[7]  Sin-Chung Chang The Method of Space-Time Conservation Element and Solution Element-A New Approach for Solving the Navier-Stokes and Euler Equations , 1995 .

[8]  Chien-Cheng Chang,et al.  An analytical and numerical study of axisymmetric flow around spheroids , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[9]  S. Cheng,et al.  Numerical Solution of a Uniform Flow over a Sphere at Intermediate Reynolds Numbers , 1969 .

[10]  Derek M. Causon,et al.  On the Choice of Wavespeeds for the HLLC Riemann Solver , 1997, SIAM J. Sci. Comput..

[11]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[12]  W. L. Chen,et al.  Low-Reynolds-Number Eddy-Viscosity Modelling Based on Non-Linear Stress-Strain/Vorticity Relations , 1996 .

[13]  A. Jameson Artificial diffusion, upwind biasing, limiters and their effect on accuracy and multigrid convergence in transonic and hypersonic flows , 1993 .

[14]  E. F. Toro,et al.  A linearized Riemann solver for the time-dependent Euler equations of gas dynamics , 1991, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[15]  J. F. Mccarthy,et al.  A Study of Wakes Behind a Circular Cylinder at M = 5.7 , 1963 .

[16]  M. Liou,et al.  A New Flux Splitting Scheme , 1993 .

[17]  James J. Quirk,et al.  A Contribution to the Great Riemann Solver Debate , 1994 .

[18]  Antony Jameson,et al.  Numerical solution of the Euler equation for compressible inviscid fluids , 1985 .

[19]  S. Patankar Numerical Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow , 2018, Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering.

[20]  Philip L. Roe,et al.  Efficient construction and utilisation of approximate riemann solutions , 1985 .

[21]  P. Lax,et al.  On Upstream Differencing and Godunov-Type Schemes for Hyperbolic Conservation Laws , 1983 .

[22]  J. Délery Experimental investigation of turbulence properties in transonic shock/boundary-layer interactions , 1983 .

[23]  H. C. Yee,et al.  Linearized form of implicit TVD schemes for the multidimensional Euler and Navier-Stokes equations , 1986 .

[24]  M. A. Leschziner,et al.  Computational modelling of shock wave/boundary layer interaction with a cell-vertex scheme and transport models of turbulence , 1993, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[25]  H. C. Yee Construction of explicit and implicit symmetric TVD schemes and their applications. [Total Variation Diminishing for fluid dynamics computation] , 1987 .

[26]  P. Roe,et al.  On Godunov-type methods near low densities , 1991 .

[27]  H. C. Yee,et al.  High-Resolution Shock-Capturing Schemes for Inviscid and Viscous Hypersonic Flows , 1990 .

[28]  T. J. Coakley,et al.  An implicit Navier-Stokes code for turbulent flow modeling , 1992 .

[29]  E. Toro,et al.  Restoration of the contact surface in the HLL-Riemann solver , 1994 .

[30]  Philip L. Roe,et al.  A comparison of numerical flux formulas for the Euler and Navier-Stokes equations , 1987 .

[31]  I. Bohachevsky,et al.  Finite difference method for numerical computation of discontinuous solutions of the equations of fluid dynamics , 1959 .