Relationships among affective factors and preferred engagement in science-related activities

This study investigated how affective factors impact participation in science learning using structural equation modeling. Using a dataset from Taiwan, a model was obtained that showed the relationships among science-related interest, enjoyment, self-efficacy, self-concept, competency, leisure time engagement, and future interest in science. The paths relating to engagement and future interest were much stronger for interest and enjoyment than for self-efficacy and self-concept. There was no significant path between science competency and future science interest or engagement. The results suggest that the affective and cognitive pathways to scientific competency are divergent and that they might be differentially activated by different contexts and activities. This indicates that school science educators might wish to reconsider the merit of overemphasizing achievement in comparison to interest. Finally, the results suggest that the development of science competency per se may not be the best way to ensure public engagement and understanding of science.

[1]  The Effects of Dichotomous Attitudes toward Science on Interest and Conceptual Understanding in Physics , 2009 .

[2]  C. Stein,et al.  Structural equation modeling. , 2012, Methods in molecular biology.

[3]  David Palmer,et al.  RESEARCH REPORT , 2004 .

[4]  Anton E. Lawson,et al.  Self-efficacy, reasoning ability, and achievement in college biology , 2007 .

[5]  Lynn D. Dierking,et al.  Investigating public science interest and understanding: evidence for the importance of free-choice learning , 2007 .

[6]  S. Hidi,et al.  Interest, Learning, and the Psychological Processes That Mediate Their Relationship. , 2002 .

[7]  Emma L. Smith,et al.  An international comparison of equity in education systems , 2004 .

[8]  R. Olsen Achievement tests from an item perspective : an exploration of single item data from the PISA and TIMSS studies, and how such data can inform us about students’ knowledge and thinking in science , 2012 .

[9]  Rani George,et al.  A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88 , 1998 .

[10]  Chris S. Hulleman,et al.  Promoting Interest and Performance in High School Science Classes , 2009, Science.

[11]  K. Boulding,et al.  THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS , 2017 .

[12]  O. Köller,et al.  Does interest matter? The relationship between academic interest and achievement in mathematics , 2001 .

[13]  Mark Girod,et al.  Appreciating the beauty of science ideas: Teaching for aesthetic understanding , 2003 .

[14]  Michaela Gläser-Zikuda,et al.  An investigation of the influence of emotional factors on learning in physics instruction , 2003 .

[15]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[16]  Patricia A. Alexander,et al.  Profiling the Differences in Students' Knowledge, Interest, and Strategic Processing , 1998 .

[17]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Self-Concept: The Interplay of Theory and Methods. , 1982 .

[18]  Robert H. Tai,et al.  Planning Early for Careers in Science , 2006, Science.

[19]  Mimi Bong,et al.  Academic Self-Concept and Self-Efficacy: How Different Are They Really? , 2003 .

[20]  David Wong,et al.  An Aesthetic (Deweyan) Perspective on Science Learning: Case Studies of Three Fourth Graders , 2002, The Elementary School Journal.

[21]  Susan Stocklmayer,et al.  Science Communication: A Contemporary Definition , 2003 .

[22]  W. Mau,et al.  Factors that Influence Persistence in Science and Engineering Career Aspirations. , 2003 .

[23]  Ali Eryilmaz,et al.  The relationship of freshmen's physics achievement and their related affective characteristics , 2007 .

[24]  Rainer Reisenzein,et al.  Emotion, Motivation und Leistung. , 2000 .

[25]  Peter Kuppens,et al.  Individual differences in the relationship between pleasure and arousal , 2008 .

[26]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Mathematics self-efficacy and mathematics performances: The need for specificity of assessment. , 1995 .

[27]  R. Schibeci,et al.  Beyond Public Perceptions of Gene Technology: Community Participation in Public Policy in Australia , 2003, Public understanding of science.

[28]  John K. Gilbert,et al.  Personal Experience and the Construction of Knowledge in Science. , 1983 .

[29]  Andrew Shouse,et al.  Learning science in informal environments : people, places, and pursuits , 2009 .

[30]  Zuway-R. Hong,et al.  The Role of Emotional Factors in Building Public Scientific Literacy and Engagement with Science , 2012 .

[31]  S. Hopmann No child, no school, no state left behind: schooling in the age of accountability 1 , 2008 .

[32]  J. Bruner Acts of meaning , 1990 .

[33]  Zuway-R. Hong,et al.  The effects of functional group counseling on inspiring low-achieving students' self-worth and self-efficacy in Taiwan. , 2012, International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie.

[34]  G. Hein Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits , 2009 .

[35]  Martina Nieswandt,et al.  Student affect and conceptual understanding in learning chemistry , 2007 .

[36]  Simon Nicholas Williams,et al.  A twenty-first century Citizens’ POLIS: introducing a democratic experiment in electronic citizen participation in science and technology decision-making , 2010 .

[37]  A. Bandura,et al.  Multifaceted impact of self-efficacy beliefs on academic functioning. , 1996, Child development.

[38]  Maria Powell,et al.  Building citizen capacities for participation in nanotechnology decision-making: the democratic virtues of the consensus Conference model , 2008 .

[39]  Roy Ballantyne,et al.  Introducing a fifth pedagogy: experience‐based strategies for facilitating learning in natural environments , 2009 .

[40]  David H. Palmer Student interest generated during an inquiry skills lesson , 2009 .

[41]  Paul A. Gore,et al.  Discriminant and Predictive Validity of Academic Self-Concept, Academic Self-Efficacy, and Mathematics-Specific Self-Efficacy. , 1997 .

[42]  J. Osborne,et al.  Pupils' views of the role and value of the science curriculum: A focus-group study , 2001 .

[43]  Ashley A. Anderson,et al.  Engaging citizens , 2011 .

[44]  Gita Taasoobshirazi,et al.  A structural equation model of conceptual change in physics , 2011 .

[45]  Jesús Rey-Rocha,et al.  Scientists' motivation to communicate science and technology to the public: surveying participants at the Madrid Science Fair , 2008 .

[46]  Chung-Chi Chen,et al.  The Effect of Integrating Aesthetic Understanding in Reflective Inquiry Activities , 2011 .

[47]  J. Eccles,et al.  Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. , 2002, Annual review of psychology.

[48]  H. Marsh,et al.  Coursework Selection: Relations to Academic Self-Concept and Achievement , 1997 .

[49]  Andreas Krapp,et al.  Structural and Dynamic Aspects of Interest Development: Theoretical Considerations from an Ontogenetic Perspective. , 2002 .

[50]  M. C. Hill,et al.  Evaluating Model Fit , 2005 .

[51]  M. Browne,et al.  Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit , 1992 .

[52]  K. A. Renninger,et al.  Individual interest as context in expository text and mathematical word problems , 2002 .

[53]  B. McCombs Motivation and Lifelong Learning , 1991 .

[54]  S. Hidi,et al.  The Four-Phase Model of Interest Development , 2006 .

[55]  Manfred Prenzel,et al.  Research on Interest in Science: Theories, methods, and findings , 2011 .

[56]  F. Seifert Local steps in an international career: a Danish-style consensus conference in Austria , 2006 .

[57]  David Hartley,et al.  EXCELLENCE AND ENJOYMENT: THE LOGIC OF A ‘CONTRADICTION’ , 2006 .

[58]  Reinhard Pekrun,et al.  A Hierarchical Conceptualization of Enjoyment in Students. , 2006 .

[59]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Scientific literacy, PISA, and socioscientific discourse: Assessment for progressive aims of science education , 2009 .

[60]  A. Baram‐Tsabari,et al.  Exploring new web-based tools to identify public interest in science , 2011 .

[61]  Hubert Ertl,et al.  Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: the reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany , 2006 .

[62]  Karen Jones,et al.  Developing Attitudes towards Science Measures , 2007 .

[63]  J. Falk The contribution of free-choice learning to public understanding of science , 2002 .

[64]  Frank M. Pajares,et al.  Role of self-efficacy and self-concept beliefs in mathematical problem solving: A path analysis. , 1994 .

[65]  David F. Treagust,et al.  Using Large-scale Assessment Datasets for Research in Science and Mathematics Education: Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) , 2007 .

[66]  Kenneth A. Strike,et al.  A revisionist theory of conceptual change , 1992 .

[67]  Martina Nieswandt,et al.  “I Just Want The Credit!” – Perceived Instrumentality as the Main Characteristic of Boys’ Motivation in a Grade 11 Science Course , 2008 .