Monotonicity-based guaranteed prediction for glucose control and supervision under intra-patient variability

The prediction of blood glucose for therapy optimization in type 1 diabetes has proved to be a difficult challenge. A main limitation is the presence of large intra-patient variability and hence, model uncertainty, which may jeopardize model individualization, both for data-based and physiological models. Interval models provide a natural framework to represent intra-patient variability in the form of interval parameters. Recent results have shown their potential in the context of glucose control, hypoglycemia risk prediction and fault detection. Interval-model-based methods rely on the prediction of envelopes containing all the possible glycemic responses according to the patient's characterized intra-patient variability. Monotone systems theory has been successfully used for this purpose. Exact or tight glucose envelopes can be computed with mathematical guarantee and computational efficiency. A review of these methods is presented here with special focus on techniques to overcome the lack of monotonicity. The methods are illustrated with examples of different literature glucose-insulin models.

[1]  Eduardo D. Sontag,et al.  Monotone and near-monotone biochemical networks , 2007, Systems and Synthetic Biology.

[2]  David Angeli,et al.  Monotone control systems , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  Sergio Romero-Vivo,et al.  On the prediction of glucose concentration under intra-patient variability in type 1 diabetes: A monotone systems approach , 2012, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[4]  Luc Jaulin,et al.  Applied Interval Analysis , 2001, Springer London.

[5]  H. Flachs,et al.  Inter- and intrasubject variability of gastric emptying in healthy volunteers measured by scintigraphy and paracetamol absorption. , 1990, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[6]  Lutz Heinemann,et al.  Variability of insulin absorption and insulin action. , 2002, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[7]  G. Williams,et al.  Handbook of Diabetes , 1999 .

[8]  R. Hovorka,et al.  Nonlinear model predictive control of glucose concentration in subjects with type 1 diabetes. , 2004, Physiological measurement.

[9]  Hal L. Smith,et al.  Monotone Dynamical Systems: An Introduction To The Theory Of Competitive And Cooperative Systems (Mathematical Surveys And Monographs) By Hal L. Smith , 1995 .

[10]  Claudio Cobelli,et al.  A model of glucose kinetics and their control by insulin, compartmental and noncompartmental approaches , 1984 .

[11]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Comparison of interval and Monte Carlo simulation for the prediction of postprandial glucose under uncertainty in type 1 diabetes mellitus , 2011, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[12]  J. Hammersley,et al.  Monte Carlo Methods , 1965 .

[13]  Sergio Romero-Vivo,et al.  Guaranteed computation methods for compartmental in-series models under uncertainty , 2013, Comput. Math. Appl..

[14]  Aaron J. Kowalski,et al.  Can we really close the loop and how soon? Accelerating the availability of an artificial pancreas: a roadmap to better diabetes outcomes. , 2009, Diabetes technology & therapeutics.

[15]  Lauren M. Huyett,et al.  Closed-Loop Artificial Pancreas Systems: Engineering the Algorithms , 2014, Diabetes Care.

[16]  Josep Vehí,et al.  Calculation of the Best Basal–Bolus Combination for Postprandial Glucose Control in Insulin Pump Therapy , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[17]  Eric Walter,et al.  Guaranteed Nonlinear State Estimator for Cooperative Systems , 2004, Numerical Algorithms.

[18]  Eric Walter,et al.  GUARANTEED NONLINEAR STATE ESTIMATION FOR CONTINUOUS-TIME DYNAMICAL MODELS FROM DISCRETE-TIME MEASUREMENTS , 2006 .