CONLIN: An efficient dual optimizer based on convex approximation concepts

The Convex Linearization method (CONLIN) exhibits many interesting features and it is applicable to a broad class of structural optimization problems. The method employs mixed design variables (either direct or reciprocal) in order to get first order, conservative approximations to the objective function and to the constraints. The primary optimization problem is therefore replaced with a sequence of explicit approximate problems having a simple algebraic structure. The explicit subproblems are convex and separable, and they can be solved efficiently by using a dual method approach.In this paper, a special purpose dual optimizer is proposed to solve the explicit subproblem generated by the CONLIN strategy. The maximum of the dual function is sought in a sequence of dual subspaces of variable dimensionality. The primary dual problem is itself replaced with a sequence of approximate quadratic subproblems with non-negativity constraints on the dual variables. Because each quadratic subproblem is restricted to the current subspace of non zero dual variables, its dimensionality is usually reasonably small. Clearly, the Hessian matrix does not need to be inverted (it can in fact be singular), and no line search process is necessary.An important advantage of the proposed maximization method lies in the fact that most of the computational effort in the iterative process is performed with reduced sets of primal variables and dual variables. Furthermore, an appropriate active set strategy has been devised, that yields a highly reliable dual optimizer.

[1]  J. Strodiot,et al.  A MATHEMATICAL CONVERGENCE ANALYSIS OF THE CONVEX LINEARIZATION METHOD FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN OPTIMIZATION , 1987 .

[2]  K. Svanberg The method of moving asymptotes—a new method for structural optimization , 1987 .

[3]  A. J. Morris,et al.  Foundations of Structural Optimization: A Unified Approach , 1982 .

[4]  Claude Fleury,et al.  Sensitivity and optimization of composite structures in MSC/NASTRAN , 1989 .

[5]  Lucien A. Schmit,et al.  Structural Synthesis by Combining Approximation Concepts and Dual Methods , 1980 .

[6]  V. Braibant,et al.  An approximation-concepts approach to shape optimal design , 1985 .

[7]  C. Fleury,et al.  Computer aided optimal design of elastic structures , 1987 .

[8]  MIXED VARIABLE STRUCTURAL OPTIMIZATION USING CONVEX LINEARIZATION TECHNIQUES , 1989 .

[9]  Niels Olhoff Optimal Structural Design via Bound Formulation and Mathematical Programming , 1989 .

[10]  Leon S. Lasdon,et al.  Optimization Theory of Large Systems , 1970 .

[11]  Raphael T. Haftka,et al.  Preliminary design of composite wings for buckling, strength and displacement constraints , 1979 .

[12]  Claude Fleury Reconciliation of Mathematical Programming and Optimality Criteria Approaches to Structural Optimization , 1982 .

[13]  V. Braibant,et al.  Optimum path planning of robot arms , 1987, Robotica.

[14]  C. Fleury Structural weight optimization by dual methods of convex programming , 1979 .

[15]  V. Braibant,et al.  Structural optimization: A new dual method using mixed variables , 1986 .

[16]  Claude Fleury Shape Optimal Design by the Convex Linearization Method , 1986 .

[17]  F. A. Lootsma,et al.  A comparative study of primal and dual approaches for solving separable and partially-separable nonlinear optimization problems , 1989 .