Faithful representation of similarities among three-dimensional shapes in human vision.

Efficient and reliable classification of visual stimuli requires that their representations reside a low-dimensional and, therefore, computationally manageable feature space. We investigated the ability of the human visual system to derive such representations from the sensory input-a highly nontrivial task, given the million or so dimensions of the visual signal at its entry point to the cortex. In a series of experiments, subjects were presented with sets of parametrically defined shapes; the points in the common high-dimensional parameter space corresponding to the individual shapes formed regular planar (two-dimensional) patterns such as a triangle, a square, etc. We then used multidimensional scaling to arrange the shapes in planar configurations, dictated by their experimentally determined perceived similarities. The resulting configurations closely resembled the original arrangements of the stimuli in the parameter space. This achievement of the human visual system was replicated by a computational model derived from a theory of object representation in the brain, according to which similarities between objects, and not the geometry of each object, need to be faithfully represented.

[1]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[2]  M. Young,et al.  Sparse population coding of faces in the inferotemporal cortex. , 1992, Science.

[3]  Keiji Tanaka Inferotemporal cortex and higher visual functions , 1992, Current Biology.

[4]  S. Ullman Aligning pictorial descriptions: An approach to object recognition , 1989, Cognition.

[5]  S. Edelman,et al.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects , 1992, Vision Research.

[6]  Padraic Monaghan,et al.  Proceedings of the 23rd annual conference of the cognitive science society , 2001 .

[7]  H H Bülthoff,et al.  Psychophysical support for a two-dimensional view interpolation theory of object recognition. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  I. Biederman Recognition-by-components: a theory of human image understanding. , 1987, Psychological review.

[9]  K Tanaka,et al.  Neuronal mechanisms of object recognition. , 1993, Science.

[10]  I. Borg Multidimensional similarity structure analysis , 1987 .

[11]  Masaki Tomonaga,et al.  Perception of complex geometric figures in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) and humans (Homo sapiens): analyses of visual similarity on the basis of choice reaction time. , 1992 .

[12]  R N Shepard,et al.  Multidimensional Scaling, Tree-Fitting, and Clustering , 1980, Science.

[13]  K Sakai,et al.  Neuronal tuning and associative mechanisms in form representation. , 1994, Learning & memory.

[14]  T. Poggio,et al.  A network that learns to recognize three-dimensional objects , 1990, Nature.

[15]  N. Logothetis,et al.  Shape representation in the inferior temporal cortex of monkeys , 1995, Current Biology.