A Tangible Augmented Reality Interface to Tiled Street Maps and its Usability Testing

The Tangible Augmented Street Map (TASM) is a novel interface to geographic objects, such as tiled maps of labeled city streets. TASM uses tangible Augmented Reality, the superimposition of digital graphics on top of real world objects in order to enhance the user’s experience. The tangible object (i.e. a cube) replicates the role of an input device. Hence the cube can be rotated to display maps that are adjacent to the current tile in geographic space. The cube is capable of theoretically infinite movement, embedded in a coordinate system with topology enabled. TASM has been tested for usability using heuristic evaluation, where selected experts use the cube, establishing non-correspondence with recognized usability principles. While general and vague, the heuristics helped prioritize immediate geographic and system-based tasks needed to improve the usability of TASM, also pointing the way towards a group of geographically oriented heuristics. This addresses a key geovisualization challenge — the creation of domain-specific and technology-related theory.

[1]  Jeremy W. Crampton,et al.  A Cognitive Analysis of Wayfinding Expertise , 1992 .

[2]  Janice Redish,et al.  User and task analysis for interface design , 1998 .

[3]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics , 1994, CHI '94.

[4]  Jürgen Döllner,et al.  Using 3D in Visualization , 2005 .

[5]  Clare Davies,et al.  GIS Usability: Recommendations Based on the User's View , 1994, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  The MagicBook: a transitional AR interface , 2001, Comput. Graph..

[7]  David R. L. Worthington,et al.  Assessment of agreement among several raters formulating multiple diagnoses. , 1981, Journal of psychiatric research.

[8]  Armin Hammand,et al.  Telegeoinformatics: Location-based Computing and Services , 2004 .

[9]  S. Siegel,et al.  Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 2022, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[10]  Menno-Jan Kraak,et al.  Making useful and useable geovisualization , 2005 .

[11]  Georg Gartner,et al.  Geospatial Information Visualization User Interface Issues , 2001 .

[12]  Andrew U. Frank,et al.  Qualitative Spatial Reasoning: Cardinal Directions as an Example , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[13]  Lars Bodum,et al.  Chapter 19 – Modelling Virtual Environments for Geovisualization: A Focus on Representation , 2005 .

[14]  Cherri M. Pancake,et al.  "Humane" Interfaces to Improve the Usability of Data Clearinghouses , 2002, GIScience.

[15]  A. MacEachren,et al.  Research Challenges in Geovisualization , 2001, KN - Journal of Cartography and Geographic Information.

[16]  Ivan Poupyrev,et al.  3D User Interfaces: Theory and Practice , 2004 .

[17]  Menno-Jan Kraak,et al.  Evaluating Self-organizing Maps for Geovisualization , 2005 .

[18]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Heuristic Evaluation of Prototypes (individual) , 2022 .

[19]  Hirokazu Kato,et al.  Explorations in the Use of Augmented Reality for Geographic Visualization , 2002, Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments.

[20]  Deborah Hix,et al.  User-Centered Design and Evaluation of Virtual Environments , 1999, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[21]  Keith C. Clarke,et al.  Mobile Mapping and Geographic Information Systems , 2004 .

[22]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  Usability inspection methods , 1994, CHI 95 Conference Companion.

[23]  Holger Regenbrecht,et al.  The tangible augmented street map , 2005, ICAT '05.

[24]  Hiroshi Ishii,et al.  Tangible User Interfaces (TUIs): A Novel Paradigm for GIS , 2004, Trans. GIS.

[25]  David Medyckyj-Scott,et al.  GIS Users Observed , 1996, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[26]  Ann Blandford,et al.  Analysing ambulance dispatcher decision making: trialing emergent themes analysis , 2002 .

[27]  Bin Jiang,et al.  Cognitive and Usability Issues in Geovisualization , 2001 .

[28]  Carolina Tobón Evaluating Geographic Visualization Tools and Methods , 2005 .