Modulating the Motor System by Action Observation After Stroke

Background and Purpose— Much recent interest surrounds the use of action observation, which is observing another individual performing a motor task, in stroke rehabilitation, to promote motor recovery by engaging similar brain regions to action execution. This may be especially useful in individuals with limited mobility. Here, we assess how cortical motor activity during action observation is affected by stroke and by stroke-related motor deficits. Methods— We used functional MRI to compare brain activity during right and left hand action observation in right-handed nondisabled participants and participants who were right-handed before left hemisphere stroke. All participants performed the same actions after their functional MRI. Results— Nondisabled participants show greater bilateral cortical motor activity when observing actions made using the left hand, whereas participants with stroke show greater ipsilesional cortical motor activity when observing actions made using the right (paretic) hand (P<0.05; corrected). For both groups, action processing is modulated by motor capability: cortical motor activity is greater when observing the hand with lower motor scores (P<0.05; corrected). Furthermore, for stroke, the extent of ipsilesional activity correlates with lesion volume (P=0.049), in a pattern that suggests adaptive plasticity. Conclusions— We found that action observation activates specific motor plans in damaged motor circuits after stroke, and this activity is related to motor capability to perform the same actions. Cortical motor activity during action observation may be relevant to motor learning, and to motor relearning in stroke rehabilitation.

[1]  S. Liew,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System: Innovations and Implications for Occupational Therapy , 2012 .

[2]  Sook-Lei Liew,et al.  Familiarity modulates mirror neuron and mentalizing regions during intention understanding , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[3]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  The mirror-neuron system. , 2004, Annual review of neuroscience.

[4]  Andrew A G Mattar,et al.  Motor Learning by Observing , 2005, Neuron.

[5]  Stefan Knecht,et al.  The assessment of hemispheric lateralization in functional MRI—Robustness and reproducibility , 2006, NeuroImage.

[6]  L. Cohen,et al.  Concurrent action observation modulates practice‐induced motor memory formation , 2008, The European journal of neuroscience.

[7]  S. Wolf,et al.  Assessing Wolf Motor Function Test as Outcome Measure for Research in Patients After Stroke , 2001, Stroke.

[8]  V. Pomeroy,et al.  Observation-to-Imitate Plus Practice Could Add Little to Physical Therapy Benefits Within 31 Days of Stroke , 2013, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[9]  M. D’Esposito,et al.  Alterations in the BOLD fMRI signal with ageing and disease: a challenge for neuroimaging , 2003, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  N. Schweighofer,et al.  Discriminant validity of a new measure of self-efficacy for reaching movements after stroke-induced hemiparesis. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[11]  Davis M. Glasser,et al.  Effects of Action Observation on Physical Training After Stroke , 2008, Stroke.

[12]  P. Rossini,et al.  Post-stroke plastic reorganisation in the adult brain , 2003, The Lancet Neurology.

[13]  S. Small,et al.  Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke , 2007, NeuroImage.

[14]  L. Cohen,et al.  Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke , 2011, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[15]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Sensitivity of the action observation network to physical and observational learning. , 2008, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  Anil F. Ramlackhansingh,et al.  Lesion identification using unified segmentation-normalisation models and fuzzy clustering , 2008, NeuroImage.

[17]  Jean-Claude Baron,et al.  The Potential for Utilizing the “Mirror Neurone System” to Enhance Recovery of the Severely Affected Upper Limb Early after Stroke: A Review and Hypothesis , 2005, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[18]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Neural Circuits Underlying Imitation Learning of Hand Actions An Event-Related fMRI Study , 2004, Neuron.

[19]  C. Winstein,et al.  The Mirror Neuron System: A Neural Substrate for Methods in Stroke Rehabilitation , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[20]  Nadim Joni Shah,et al.  Prefrontal involvement in imitation learning of hand actions: Effects of practice and expertise , 2007, NeuroImage.

[21]  J. Mazziotta,et al.  Cortical mechanisms of human imitation. , 1999, Science.

[22]  Emily S. Cross,et al.  Building a motor simulation de novo: Observation of dance by dancers , 2006, NeuroImage.

[23]  T. Elbert,et al.  New treatments in neurorehabiliation founded on basic research , 2002, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Hand motor recovery after stroke: tuning the orchestra to improve hand motor function. , 2006, Cognitive and behavioral neurology : official journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology.

[25]  R. Passingham,et al.  Action observation and acquired motor skills: an FMRI study with expert dancers. , 2005, Cerebral cortex.

[26]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Neurological Principles and Rehabilitation of Action Disorders: Rehabilitation Interventions , 2022 .

[27]  Paul A Thompson,et al.  Measurement Structure of the Wolf Motor Function Test: Implications for Motor Control Theory , 2010, Neurorehabilitation and neural repair.

[28]  Angela R. Laird,et al.  ALE meta-analysis of action observation and imitation in the human brain , 2010, NeuroImage.