Adolescents' Perceptions of Popularity-Motivated Behaviors, Characteristics, and Relationships in Cyberspace and Cyber Aggression: The Role of Gender

Research is increasingly revealing that adolescents utilize electronic technologies to promote and/or maintain their social standing among their peer group. Little is known about whether adolescents' perceptions of popularity-motivated behaviors, characteristics, and relationships in cyberspace are associated with popularity-motivated cyber relational aggression. It is also unclear how gender might impact these associations, especially considering that adolescent girls and boys differ in regard to the type of behaviors, characteristics, and relationships they believe contribute to popularity. To this end, this study examined the potential moderating effect of gender on the association between adolescents' perceptions of popularity-motivated behaviors, characteristics, and relationships in cyberspace and their engagement in popularity-motivated cyber relational aggression over 1 year, from seventh to eighth grade. There were 217 eighth graders (51 percent female; M age = 12.13) from three middle schools in a large Midwestern city in the United States included in this research. They completed questionnaires on their popularity-motivated behaviors, characteristics, and relationships in cyberspace and their perpetration of popularity-motivated cyber relational aggression during the seventh grade. One year later, they completed the perpetration of popularity-motivated cyber relational aggression questionnaire. The results revealed that the association between popularity-motivated behaviors, characteristics, and relationships in cyberspace and the perpetration of popularity-motivated cyber relational aggression was stronger for girls, while such an association was not found for boys. These findings indicate the importance of considering cyberspace as an environment in which adolescents can enhance their social standing among peers from their school.

[1]  Michelle F. Wright.  Perceptions of Popularity-Related Behaviors in the Cyber Context: Relations to Cyber Social Behaviors , 2015 .

[2]  Michelle F. Wright.  Adolescents’ cyber aggression perpetration and cyber victimization: the longitudinal associations with school functioning , 2015 .

[3]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  The Association Between Cyber Victimization and Subsequent Cyber Aggression: The Moderating Effect of Peer Rejection , 2013, Journal of Youth and Adolescence.

[4]  Michelle F. Wright.  Longitudinal Investigation of the Associations Between Adolescents’ Popularity and Cyber Social Behaviors , 2014 .

[5]  Jennifer D. Shapka,et al.  Does One Size Fit All? Ethnic Differences in Parenting Behaviors and Motivations for Adolescent Engagement in Cyberbullying , 2013, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[6]  Megan A. Moreno,et al.  Cyberbullying, Depression, and Problem Alcohol Use in Female College Students: A Multisite Study , 2015, Cyberpsychology Behav. Soc. Netw..

[7]  S. Bauman,et al.  Associations among bullying, cyberbullying, and suicide in high school students. , 2013, Journal of adolescence.

[8]  Jennifer D. Shapka,et al.  Are Cyberbullies really bullies? An investigation of reactive and proactive online aggression , 2012, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[9]  Rhiannon L. Smith,et al.  Relational and Overt Aggression in Childhood and Adolescence: Clarifying Mean-Level Gender Differences and Associations with Peer Acceptance. , 2010, Social development.

[10]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Chinese Adolescents’ Social Status Goals , 2014 .

[11]  Michelle F. Wright,et al.  Classification of online problematic situations in the context of youths’ development , 2014 .

[12]  Amanda J. Rose,et al.  Overt and relational aggression and perceived popularity: developmental differences in concurrent and prospective relations. , 2004, Developmental psychology.

[13]  Leanna M. Closson.  Status and Gender Differences in Early Adolescents' Descriptions of Popularity. , 2009 .

[14]  K. Dodge,et al.  Dimensions and types of social status: A cross-age perspective. , 1982 .

[15]  C. Schoffstall,et al.  Cyber Aggression: The Relation between Online Offenders and Offline Social Competence , 2011 .

[16]  Adrian Raine,et al.  The Reactive-Proactive Aggression Questionnaire: Differential Correlates of Reactive and Proactive Aggression in Adolescent Boys. , 2006, Aggressive behavior.

[17]  D. Goh,et al.  Cyberbullying Among Adolescents: The Role of Affective and Cognitive Empathy, and Gender , 2010, Child psychiatry and human development.

[18]  A. Cillessen,et al.  From censure to reinforcement: developmental changes in the association between aggression and social status. , 2004, Child development.

[19]  Beverley D. Cairns,et al.  What makes a girl (or a boy) popular (or unpopular)? African American children's perceptions and developmental differences. , 2006, Developmental psychology.

[20]  C. Nixon.  Current perspectives: the impact of cyberbullying on adolescent health , 2014, Adolescent health, medicine and therapeutics.

[21]  Donna Eder,et al.  The Cycle of Popularity: Interpersonal Relations among Female Adolescents. , 1985 .

[22]  Lourdes Villardón-Gallego,et al.  Cyberbullying in adolescents: Modalities and aggressors' profile , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[23]  Jeremy W. Luk,et al.  Patterns of adolescent bullying behaviors: physical, verbal, exclusion, rumor, and cyber. , 2012, Journal of school psychology.

[24]  K. Dodge,et al.  Social-information-processing factors in reactive and proactive aggression in children's peer groups. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[25]  P. Orpinas,et al.  Gender differences in trajectories of relational aggression perpetration and victimization from middle to high school. , 2014, Aggressive behavior.