A 3-D numerical field solver based on the finite-volume time-domain method

Numerical electromagnetic (EM) simulations are an important tool for the design, anal¬ ysis and optimization of electronic devices; simulations assist an engineer to minimize time and cost necessary to reach the maturity phase of a device. Thereby, the goal of the computational electromagnetics (CEM) tool is to guarantee accurate simulation results as well as an easy and faultless operation. Nowadays, many simulation tools based on different numerical techniques are commercially available. Nevertheless there are still more promising numerical methods to be explored in the frame of EM. In order to ful¬ fill the requirements imposed on the CEM tool, the employed numerical method has to provide the following characteristics: The basic requirement in order to achieve accurate simulation results is the precise modeling of the investigated problem. Not less impor¬ tant however is the error introduced and the stability provided by the approximation of the Maxwell's equations in the numerical method. In this scope, the Finite-Volume Time-Domain (FVTD) method shows very promis¬ ing prospects: On the one hand, the method exploits an unstructured, inhomogeneous polyhedral mesh capable of accurate approximation of complex geometries. Curved and oblique surfaces can be modeled with a high accuracy, and small details in close prox¬ imity to a large overall structure as well as high dielectric contrasts can be modeled without difficulties. On the other hand, the chosen FVTD formulation is second order accurate both in time and in space, and the explicit time domain (TD) formulation of the method allows for a comfortable treatment of inter-cell relations such as boundary conditions, excitation schemes and ports. The FVTD method takes its origin in computational fluid dynamics (CFD) and is applied to the solution of the Maxwell's equations since the beginning of the 1990s. Many implementations of the method exist, all of which show different characteristics and advantages. Nevertheless, FVTD is still in its infancy for the application in CEM, and only a few groups worldwide perform investigations of the method. In this thesis, the implementation of the FVTD method and the application of FVTD to the analysis of complex, real-world EM problems are presented. Relevant aspects in order to yield a practical CEM tool are discussed and verified: Among other things, the definition of a source plane with a built-in absorbing boundary condition (ABC) and a novel field-based scheme for the extraction of a generalized scattering matrix are proposed. In the beginning of this thesis, the hyperbolic Maxwell's equations are written in a conservative-law form and the explicit update equation used in FVTD is derived. Special attention is paid to the flux-splitting procedure which separates the flux through a cell face into an incoming and an outgoing part. The flux splitting is one of the main cha¬ racteristics of the FVTD method: As demonstrated in the continuative parts of the thesis, the separated fluxes are exploited for important numerical procedures such as for example the extraction of scattering parameters.

[1]  Isaac Amidror,et al.  Scattered data interpolation methods for electronic imaging systems: a survey , 2002, J. Electronic Imaging.

[2]  V. Shankar,et al.  A Time-Domain, Finite-Volume Treatment for the Maxwell Equations , 1990 .

[3]  W. F. Hall,et al.  A time-domain differential solver for electromagnetic scattering problems , 1989 .

[4]  C. Durney,et al.  Modeling sources in the FDTD formulation and their use in quantifying source and boundary condition errors , 1995 .

[5]  H. Macdonald,et al.  The Integration of the Equations of Propagation of Electric Waves , 1912 .

[6]  P. Roe Approximate Riemann Solvers, Parameter Vectors, and Difference Schemes , 1997 .

[7]  J. Steger,et al.  Flux vector splitting of the inviscid gasdynamic equations with application to finite-difference methods , 1981 .

[8]  D. Baumann,et al.  Field-based scattering-matrix extraction scheme for the FVTD method exploiting a flux-splitting algorithm , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[9]  Christophe Fumeaux,et al.  Comparison of errors and stability in FDTD and FVTD , 2003 .

[10]  Y. Rahmat-Samii,et al.  Finite difference and finite volume time domain techniques in electromagnetics: A comparative study , 1996 .

[11]  R. Collin Foundations for microwave engineering , 1966 .

[12]  J. S. Chen,et al.  The finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) and the finite-volume time-domain (FVTD) methods in solving Maxwell's equations , 1997 .

[13]  Sukumar Chakravarthy,et al.  High Resolution Schemes and the Entropy Condition , 1984 .

[14]  Raj Mittra,et al.  Hybrid finite-difference/finite-volume time-domain analysis for microwave integrated circuits with curved PEC surfaces using a nonuniform rectangular grid , 2000 .

[15]  P. Lax,et al.  Systems of conservation laws , 1960 .

[16]  Fredrik Edelvik,et al.  Explicit Hybrid Time Domain Solver for the Maxwell Equations in 3D , 2000, J. Sci. Comput..

[17]  V. P. Cable,et al.  Finite-volume time-domain (FVTD) techniques for EM scattering , 1991 .

[18]  G. Mur Absorbing Boundary Conditions for the Finite-Difference Approximation of the Time-Domain Electromagnetic-Field Equations , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[19]  P. Leuchtmann,et al.  A generalized local time-step scheme for efficient FVTD simulations in strongly inhomogeneous meshes , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques.

[20]  Allen Taflove,et al.  Computational Electrodynamics the Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method , 1995 .

[21]  R. F. Warming,et al.  Upwind Second-Order Difference Schemes and Applications in Aerodynamic Flows , 1976 .

[22]  A. Majda,et al.  Absorbing boundary conditions for the numerical simulation of waves , 1977 .

[23]  Alan V. Oppenheim,et al.  Discrete-time Signal Processing. Vol.2 , 2001 .

[24]  M. Remaki A new finite volume scheme for solving Maxwell’s system , 2000 .

[25]  G. Arfken Mathematical Methods for Physicists , 1967 .

[26]  M. S. Wartak,et al.  Practical comparison of finite difference time domain schemes , 1991, Antennas and Propagation Society Symposium 1991 Digest.

[27]  R. F. Warming,et al.  The modified equation approach to the stability and accuracy analysis of finite-difference methods , 1974 .

[28]  Antti V. Räisänen,et al.  Application of a simple and efficient source excitation technique to the FDTD analysis of waveguide and microstrip circuits , 1996 .

[29]  X. Ferrieres,et al.  Application of a hybrid finite difference/finite volume method to solve an automotive EMC problem , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility.

[30]  Richard W. Ziolkowski,et al.  A Three-Dimensional Modified Finite Volume Technique for Maxwell's Equations , 1990 .