Objective-AoA norms for 175 names in Spanish: relationships with other psycholinguistic variables, estimated AoA, and data from other languages

There is a large body of evidence suggesting that words learnt early in life are recognised and produced faster than words learnt later in life, even when other variables are controlled. This is known as the Age of Acquisition (AoA) effect. However, there is an aspect of AoA that requires research of a greater depth, namely the method of obtaining the AoA measures. In the majority of studies, adult participants were asked to estimate the age at which they learnt a given word. Morrison, Chappell, and Ellis (1997) proposed a new method for obtaining objective-AoA data. They asked children to name some objects, and the age at which a given word appeared with 75% or more frequency was considered the AoA of that word. Although this method is more valid than adult ratings, it has only rarely been used. The main aim of this work is to provide objective-AoA norms in Spanish for a set of 175 object names following the procedures used by Morrison et al. The relationships among objective-AoA, estimated-AoA, and other psycholinguistic variables (name-agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, word length, etc.) obtained from a previous study are also analysed. Finally, the similarity of objective- and estimated-AoA measures was examined using data from several languages. A cluster analysis and a multidimensional-scaling analysis revealed that the estimated-AoA measures in a language correlated more with the estimated-AoA measures of the other languages than with the objective measures in the same language. The results suggest that it would be desirable to always use objective-AoA norms because they are less skewed by familiarity.

[1]  J. Pind,et al.  Icelandic norms for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) pictures: name and image agreement, familiarity, and age of acquisition. , 2000, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[2]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Age of acquisition in face categorisation: is there an instance-based account? , 1999, Cognition.

[3]  S. Gerhand,et al.  Age of acquisition, word frequency, and the role of phonology in the lexical decision task , 1999, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Joan Gay Snodgrass,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures , 1996 .

[5]  F. Cuetos,et al.  Diccionario de frecuencias de las unidades lingüísticas del castellano , 1995 .

[6]  F Cuetos,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[7]  J. Carroll,et al.  Age-of-acquisition norms for 220 picturable nouns , 1973 .

[8]  A W Ellis,et al.  Contrasting effects of age of acquisition and word frequency on auditory and visual lexical decision , 1998, Memory & cognition.

[9]  L. Winter,et al.  Confidence in age-of-acquisition estimates and its relationship to children’s labeling performance , 1978 .

[10]  Anthony F Jorm,et al.  The validity of word age-of-acquisition ratings : a longitudinal study of a child's word knowledge , 1991 .

[11]  R. Taylor Effects of Age of Acquisition, Word Frequency, and Familiarity on Object Recognition and Naming in Dementia , 1998, Perceptual and motor skills.

[12]  David C. Rubin,et al.  51 properties of 125 words: A unit analysis of verbal behavior , 1980 .

[13]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading , 1988 .

[14]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[15]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[16]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  The effects of age-of-acquisition and frequency-of-occurrence in visual word recognition: Further evidence from the Dutch language , 2000 .

[17]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION , 1995 .

[18]  Cristina Burani,et al.  Word naming times and psycholinguistic norms for Italian nouns , 2002, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[19]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  Objective age-of-acquisition (AoA) norms for a set of 230 object names in French: Relationships with psycholinguistic variables, the English data from Morrison et al. (1997), and naming latencies , 2003 .

[20]  P. Gatignol,et al.  Factors predicting success in picture naming in Alzheimer's disease and primary progressive aphasia , 2001, Brain and Cognition.

[21]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Age of acquisition and speech production in L2 , 2003, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[22]  M. Brysbaert Word frequency affects naming latency in Dutch when age of acquisition is controlled. , 1996 .

[23]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  Armando Piñeiro,et al.  A lexical database for spanish-speaking children , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[25]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[26]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition ratings for 2816 Dutch four- and five-letter nouns , 2000 .

[27]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[28]  J. Pine Variation in Vocabulary Development as a Function of Birth Order , 1995 .

[29]  Arturo E. Hernandez,et al.  Age of acquisition and word frequency: Determinants of object-naming speed and accuracy , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[30]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Two age of acquisition effects in the reading of Japanese Kanji , 1997 .

[31]  Kenneth Gilhooly,et al.  Imagery, concreteness, age-of-acquisition, familiarity, and meaningfulness values for 205 five-letter words having single-solution anagrams , 1977 .

[32]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of acquisition and lexical processing in aphasia: a case study , 1994 .

[33]  A. Ellis,et al.  Aphasic naming in Spanish: predictors and errors , 2002, Brain and Language.

[34]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Naming in semantic dementia—what matters? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[36]  J. Carroll,et al.  Word Frequency and Age of Acquisition as Determiners of Picture-Naming Latency , 1973 .

[37]  E. Bates,et al.  A Study of Age-of-acquisition ( AoA ) Ratings in Adults , 2001 .

[38]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of acquisition and the completeness of phonological representations , 2002 .

[39]  Lorella Lotto,et al.  Naming times and standardized norms for the italian PD/DPSS set of 266 pictures: Direct comparisons with American, English, French, and Spanish published databases , 2000, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[40]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age of acquisition effects in word naming and lexical decision. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[41]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Word age-of-acquisition, reading latencies and auditory recognition , 1981 .

[42]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age and age of acquisition: An evaluation of the cumulative frequency hypothesis , 2002 .

[43]  Age-of-acquisition and cumulative frequency have independent effects. , 1999, Cognition.

[44]  F X Alario,et al.  A set of 400 pictures standardized for French: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, visual complexity, image variability, and age of acquisition , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[45]  Cristina Izura,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in word recognition and production in first and second languages , 2002 .

[46]  R. Logie,et al.  Age-of-acquisition, imagery, concreteness, familiarity, and ambiguity measures for 1,944 words , 1980 .

[47]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Re-evaluating age-of-acquisition effects: are they simply cumulative-frequency effects? , 2001, Cognition.