Growth during recovery evidences the waterlogging tolerance of forage grasses

Abstract. Waterlogging is a stress of increasing importance for pastures as a consequence of global climate change. We evaluated the impact of waterlogging on four forage grasses with alleged differential tolerance, emphasising not only responses during the stress but also their reported ability to recover from it. To do this, 42-day plants of Dactylis glomerata, Bromus catharticus, Festuca arundinacea and Phalaris aquatica were subjected to 15-day waterlogging, followed by a subsequent 15-day recovery period. Shoot and root growth (i.e. RGR) during both periods, in addition to net photosynthesis and stomatal conductance rates during waterlogging were assessed. Sensitivity exhibited by D. glomerata and B. catharticus during waterlogging was related to growth arrest of roots – but not of shoots – along with a progressive fall in stomatal conductance and net photosynthesis. The injury during waterlogging preceded a negligible growth of shoots and roots, only evident during recovery in both species. By contrast, P. aquatica exhibited unaltered root RGR and promoted shoot RGR with no impact on leaf gas exchange during waterlogging; whereas F. arundinacea showed intermediate tolerance as root RGR was reduced during waterlogging, with stomatal conductance, net photosynthesis and shoot RGR remaining unaffected. These latter two species fully regained shoot and root RGR during recovery. So, P. aquatica and F. arundinacea seem more suitable for prone-to-flood lowlands, whereas to be conclusive about waterlogging tolerance, it is necessary to examine plant recovery as shown in D. glomerata and B. catharticus.

[1]  Joost T. van Dongen,et al.  Community recommendations on terminology and procedures used in flooding and low oxygen stress research. , 2017, The New phytologist.

[2]  J. Scheneiter,et al.  The herbage productivity of tall fescue in the Pampas region of Argentina is correlated to its ecological niche , 2016 .

[3]  L. Voesenek,et al.  Leaf gas films, underwater photosynthesis and plant species distributions in a flood gradient. , 2016, Plant, cell & environment.

[4]  A. Grimoldi,et al.  Soil water regime of grassland communities along subtle topographic gradient in the Flooding Pampa (Argentina). , 2016 .

[5]  E. Ploschuk,et al.  Differential growth of Spartina densiflora populations under saline flooding is related to adventitious root formation and innate root ion regulation. , 2015, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[6]  I. Rao,et al.  Morpho-anatomical adaptations to waterlogging by germplasm accessions in a tropical forage grass , 2013, AoB Plants.

[7]  J. Martina,et al.  Increased spatial dominance in high nitrogen, saturated soil due to clonal architecture plasticity of the invasive wetland plant, Phalaris arundinacea , 2013, Plant Ecology.

[8]  K. Caudle,et al.  Effects of Flooding on Photosynthesis, Chlorophyll Fluorescence, and Oxygen Stress in Plants of Varying Flooding Tolerance , 2012 .

[9]  G. G. Striker.  Time is on our side: the importance of considering a recovery period when assessing flooding tolerance in plants , 2012, Ecological Research.

[10]  A. Grimoldi,et al.  Increasing defoliation frequency constrains regrowth of the forage legume Lotus tenuis under flooding. The role of crown reserves , 2011, Plant and Soil.

[11]  E. Ploschuk,et al.  Subtle topographical differences along a floodplain promote different plant strategies among Paspalum dilatatum subspecies and populations , 2010 .

[12]  L. Voesenek,et al.  Flooding tolerance: suites of plant traits in variable environments. , 2009, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[13]  L. Hoffmann,et al.  Impact of competition on plant performances along a flooding gradient: a multi‐species experiment , 2009 .

[14]  A. Grimoldi,et al.  Flooding effects on plants recovering from defoliation in Paspalum dilatatum and Lotus tenuis. , 2008, Annals of botany.

[15]  S. Harden,et al.  Herbage mass and persistence of pasture legumes and grasses at two potentially different saline and waterlogging sites in northern New South Wales , 2008 .

[16]  E. Ploschuk,et al.  Physiological and Anatomical Basis of Differential Tolerance to Soil Flooding of Lotus corniculatus L. and Lotus glaber Mill , 2005, Plant and Soil.

[17]  Joy B. Zedler,et al.  Multiple disturbances accelerate invasion of reed canary grass ( Phalaris arundinacea L.) in a mesocosm study , 2004, Oecologia.

[18]  Kevin F. Smith,et al.  The effects of waterlogging on growth, photosynthesis and biomass allocation in perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.) genotypes with contrasting root development , 2003, The Journal of Agricultural Science.

[19]  E. Visser,et al.  Measurement of porosity in very small samples of plant tissue , 2003, Plant and Soil.

[20]  C. Rosenzweig,et al.  Increased crop damage in the US from excess precipitation under climate change , 2002 .

[21]  N. W. Galwey,et al.  Similarity and diversity in adventitious root anatomy as related to root aeration among a range of wetland and dryland grass species , 2002 .

[22]  Hans Lambers,et al.  Short‐term waterlogging has long‐term effects on the growth and physiology of wheat , 2002 .

[23]  M. Otte,et al.  What is stress to a wetland plant , 2001 .

[24]  E. Chaneton,et al.  Flooding induces a suite of adaptive plastic responses in the grass Paspalum dilatatum , 2001 .

[25]  R. Ríos,et al.  Genetic variability measures among Bromus catharticus Vahl. populations and cultivars with RAPD and AFLP markers , 2001, Euphytica.

[26]  J. Newman,et al.  Festuca arundinacea Schreber (F. elatior L. ssp. arundinacea (Schreber) Hackel) , 2001 .

[27]  F. Lelièvre,et al.  Survival and recovery of perennial forage grasses under prolonged Mediterranean drought: I. Growth, death, water relations and solute content in herbage and stubble. , 1998, The New phytologist.

[28]  H. J. Trebino,et al.  Flooding, topography, and successional age as determinants of species diversity in old-field vegetation , 1996 .

[29]  L. Voesenek,et al.  Physiological ecology of riverside species : adaptive responses of plants to submergence , 1994 .

[30]  S. Lolicato,et al.  Past and present improvement of cocksfoot (Dactylis glomerata L.) in Australia and New Zealand , 1994 .

[31]  C. Blom,et al.  Flooding regimes and life-history characteristics of short-lived species in river forelands , 1993 .

[32]  H. Yasmin,et al.  Differential waterlogging tolerance in three grasses of contrasting habitats: Aeluropus lagopoides (L.) Trin., Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. and Leptochloa fusca (L.) Kunth , 1991 .

[33]  J. Etherington.  RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN MORPHOLOGICAL ADAPTATION TO GRAZING, CARBON BALANCE AND WATERLOGGING TOLERANCE IN CLONES OF DACTYLIS GLOMERATA L. , 1984 .

[34]  L. Kappen,et al.  Responses of stomata to changes in humidity , 1971, Planta.

[35]  D. Briske.  Strategies of Plant Survival in Grazed Systems : A Functional Interpretation , 2012 .

[36]  A. Humphries.  The growth of some perennial grasses in waterlogged soil. I. The effect of waterlogging on the availability of nitrogen and phosphorus to the plant , 1962 .