Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT imaging: Prognostic value.

BACKGROUND There is no published data on the prognostic value of global myocardial perfusion values at stress dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging (CTMPI). METHODS Data of 144 patients from 6 centers who had undergone coronary CT angiography (coronary CTA) and CTMPI were assessed. Coronary CTA studies were acquired at rest; CTMPI was performed under vasodilator stress. Coronary CTA data were evaluated for coronary artery stenosis (≥50% luminal narrowing) on a per-vessel basis. Volumes-of-interest were placed over the entire left ventricular myocardium to obtain global myocardial blood flow (MBF), myocardial blood volume (MBV), and volume transfer constant (Ktrans). Follow-up was obtained at 6/12/18 months. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE, defined as cardiac death, non-fatal myocardial infarction, unstable angina requiring hospitalization, and revascularization) served as the endpoint. RESULTS MACE occurred in 40 patients (nonfatal myocardial infarction, n = 1, unstable angina, n = 13, PCI, n = 23, and CABG, n = 3). Patients with global MBF of <121 mL/100 mL/min were at increased risk for MACE (HR 2.07, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.12-3.84, p = 0.02). This association remained significant after adjusting for age, gender, and clinical risk factors (HR 2.17, 95%CI: 1.16-4.06, p = 0.02), after further adjusting for presence of ≥50% stenosis at coronary CTA (HR 2.18, 95%CI: 1.16-4.10, p = 0.02) and when excluding early (<6 months) revascularizations (HR 2.34, 95%CI: 1.01-5.43, p = 0.0486). Global MBV and Ktrans were not independent predictors of MACE. CONCLUSION Global quantification of left ventricular MBF at stress dynamic CTMPI may have incremental predictive value for future MACE over clinical risk factors and assessment of stenosis at coronary CTA.

[1]  R. Hendel,et al.  The Impact of Appropriate Use on the Prognostic Value of SPECT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging , 2013 .

[2]  D. Berman,et al.  Influence of sex on risk stratification with stress myocardial perfusion Rb-82 positron emission tomography: Results from the PET (Positron Emission Tomography) Prognosis Multicenter Registry. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[3]  C. Fink,et al.  Adenosine-stress dynamic real-time myocardial perfusion CT and adenosine-stress first-pass dual-energy myocardial perfusion CT for the assessment of acute chest pain: initial results. , 2012, European journal of radiology.

[4]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  Long-term prognostic value of 13N-ammonia myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography added value of coronary flow reserve. , 2009, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  R. Vliegenthart,et al.  Absolute Versus Relative Myocardial Blood Flow by Dynamic CT Myocardial Perfusion Imaging in Patients With Anatomic Coronary Artery Disease. , 2015, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[6]  Michael J Pencina,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of fractional flow reserve from anatomic CT angiography. , 2012, JAMA.

[7]  S. Petersen,et al.  Diagnostic performance of hyperaemic myocardial blood flow index obtained by dynamic computed tomography: does it predict functionally significant coronary lesions? , 2014, European heart journal cardiovascular Imaging.

[8]  G. Vanzetto,et al.  Long-term additive prognostic value of thallium-201 myocardial perfusion imaging over clinical and exercise stress test in low to intermediate risk patients : study in 1137 patients with 6-year follow-up. , 1999, Circulation.

[9]  G. Beller,et al.  Stress myocardial perfusion imaging for assessing prognosis: an update. , 2011, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[10]  D. Berman,et al.  Exercise myocardial perfusion SPECT in patients without known coronary artery disease: incremental prognostic value and use in risk stratification. , 1996, Circulation.

[11]  C. Becker,et al.  CT stress perfusion imaging for detection of haemodynamically relevant coronary stenosis as defined by FFR , 2013, Heart.

[12]  Young Jun Cho,et al.  Dynamic CT myocardial perfusion imaging: performance of 3D semi-automated evaluation software , 2013, European Radiology.

[13]  S. Chae,et al.  Independent and incremental prognostic value of exercise single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) thallium imaging in coronary artery disease. , 1993, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  M. Reiser,et al.  Dynamic myocardial CT perfusion imaging for evaluation of myocardial ischemia as determined by MR imaging. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[15]  R. Hendel,et al.  A selection of recent original research papers , 2013, Journal of Nuclear Cardiology.

[16]  M. Pencina,et al.  Improved Cardiac Risk Assessment With Noninvasive Measures of Coronary Flow Reserve , 2011, Circulation.

[17]  R. Blankstein,et al.  Appropriateness and utilization of cardiac CT: Implications for development of future criteria , 2010, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[18]  Keiichiro Yoshinaga,et al.  What is the prognostic value of myocardial perfusion imaging using rubidium-82 positron emission tomography? , 2006, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  Fred S Apple,et al.  Third universal definition of myocardial infarction , 2012 .

[20]  Independent and incremental prognostic value of left ventricular ejection fraction determined by stress gated rubidium 82 PET imaging in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease , 2008 .

[21]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Adenosine-Stress Dynamic Myocardial CT Perfusion Imaging: Initial Clinical Experience , 2010, Investigative radiology.

[22]  M. Reiser,et al.  Detection of Hemodynamically Signifi cant Coronary Artery Stenosis : Incremental Diagnostic Value of Dynamic CT-based Myocardial Perfusion Imaging 1 , 2011 .

[23]  S. Reis,et al.  Prognostic value of global MR myocardial perfusion imaging in women with suspected myocardial ischemia and no obstructive coronary disease: results from the NHLBI-sponsored WISE (Women's Ischemia Syndrome Evaluation) study. , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.

[24]  U. Schoepf,et al.  Adenosine-stress dynamic myocardial perfusion imaging with second-generation dual-source CT: comparison with conventional catheter coronary angiography and SPECT nuclear myocardial perfusion imaging. , 2012, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[25]  J. Hsieh,et al.  Non-invasive assessment of functionally relevant coronary artery stenoses with quantitative CT perfusion: preliminary clinical experiences , 2011, European Radiology.

[26]  Kathryn A. Williams,et al.  Impaired myocardial flow reserve on rubidium-82 positron emission tomography imaging predicts adverse outcomes in patients assessed for myocardial ischemia. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[27]  L. Husmann,et al.  Prognostic value of cardiac hybrid imaging integrating single-photon emission computed tomography with coronary computed tomography angiography. , 2011, European Heart Journal.

[28]  M. Javadi,et al.  Prediction of Short-Term Cardiovascular Events Using Quantification of Global Myocardial Flow Reserve in Patients Referred for Clinical 82Rb PET Perfusion Imaging , 2011, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[29]  M. Pencina,et al.  Prognostic value of stress myocardial perfusion positron emission tomography: results from a multicenter observational registry. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[30]  Oliver Gaemperli,et al.  Abstract 3413: Prognostic Value of Multi-slice Computed Tomography and Gated Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography in a Cohort of 426 Patients with Known or Suspected Coronary Artery Disease , 2007 .

[31]  Fabian Bamberg,et al.  Global quantification of left ventricular myocardial perfusion at dynamic CT: feasibility in a multicenter patient population. , 2014, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.