The Application of Psychological Scaling Techniques to Knowledge Elicitation for Knowledge-Based Systems

A formal knowledge-elicitation methodology that incorporates psychological scaling techniques to produce empirically derived knowledge representations is discussed. The methodology has been successfully applied in several domains and overcomes many of the difficulties of traditional knowledge-elicitation techniques. Research issues pertaining to the use of scaling techniques as knowledge-elicitation tools are outlined and a particular issue, the elicitation of levels of abstraction in knowledge representations, is discussed in detail. Results from a study on the elicitation of knowledge about levels of abstraction for a set of Unix commands from experienced Unix users indicated that the representations obtained using this methodology can be used to obtain more abstract (i.e. categorical) representations of that knowledge.

[1]  D. W. Dearholt,et al.  A formal interface design methodology based on user knowledge , 1986, CHI '86.

[2]  Bob J. Wielinga,et al.  Knowledge Acquisition for Expert Systems , 1987, Advanced Topics in Artificial Intelligence.

[3]  R. Shepard The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. , 1962 .

[4]  Nancy M. Cooke,et al.  A formal methodology for acquiring and representing expert knowledge , 1986, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[5]  Mike Greenwell Knowledge engineering for expert systems , 1988 .

[6]  K. R. Paap,et al.  Cognitive jnds-implications for scaling techniques using semantic judgments , 1986 .

[7]  John Karat,et al.  Evaluating a Method for Structuring the User-System Interface , 1982 .

[8]  Lance J. Rips,et al.  Semantic distance and the verification of semantic relations , 1973 .

[9]  A. Tversky Features of Similarity , 1977 .

[10]  Thomas S. Tullis,et al.  Designing a menu-based interface to an operating system , 1985, CHI '85.

[11]  Robert R. Hoffman,et al.  The Problem of Extracting the Knowledge of Experts from the Perspective of Experimental Psychology , 1987, AI Mag..

[12]  Renate J. Roske-Hofstrand,et al.  Cognitive networks as a guide to menu organization: An application in the automated cockpit , 1986 .

[13]  Keith A. Butler,et al.  Use of psychometric tools for knowledge acquistion: a case study , 1986 .

[14]  Imran A. Zualkernan,et al.  Specification for Expertise , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[15]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. , 1977 .

[16]  R. Shepard The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[17]  James E. McDonald,et al.  Adapting Menu Layout to Tasks , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[18]  Patrick J. Hayes,et al.  Some problems and non-problems in representation theory , 1974 .

[19]  H. Simon,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1986 .

[20]  Edward J. Shoben,et al.  Applications of Multidimensional Scaling in Cognitive Psychology , 1983 .

[21]  James E. McDonald,et al.  Searching for Items in Menus: The Effects of Organization and Type of Target , 1983 .

[22]  Francis T. Durso,et al.  Recall and Measures of Memory Organization , 1986 .

[23]  S. C. Johnson Hierarchical clustering schemes , 1967, Psychometrika.

[24]  D. Medin,et al.  The role of theories in conceptual coherence. , 1985, Psychological review.

[25]  Jeffrey M. Bradshaw,et al.  Expertise Transfer and Complex Problems: Using AQUINAS as a Knowledge-Acquisition Workbench for Knowledge-Based Systems , 1987, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  Roger W. Schvaneveldt,et al.  Measuring the Structure of Expertise , 1985, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..