Understanding t he U tility o f A djuvant S ystemic T herapy for P rimary B reast C ancer

Purpose: Physicians and patients require quantitative information on the expected benefits of adjuvant therapy for primary breast cancer to make appropriate treatment decisions. To date, there has not been any widely available method for estimating the benefits from adjuvant systemic therapy, in terms of long-term disease-free survival probabilities, in patients with primary breast cancer. Methods: Baseline prognostic information for primary breast cancer patients was estimated by asking 11 breast cancer specialists to complete a questionnaire on baseline prognosis and then using mean values. Data on the relative benefits of adjuvant therapy were culled from systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials. A computer algorithm was developed to calculate 10-year absolute outcome data. Results from this evaluation were compared with a previously described actuarial algorithm. Results: Individual prognostic estimates varied within a group of breast cancer specialists, but mean values of their estimates closely followed published data. Translation of expected benefits of adjuvant therapy from relative to absolute terms was performed with a simple computer algorithm. The data were translated into tabular forms to facilitate user-friendly clinical use. Conclusion: The provided data should facilitate a better understanding of the absolute magnitude of benefit for available systemic adjuvant therapies in individual women with primary breast cancer. This should allow patients to make more informed decisions about their options. J Clin Oncol 19:972-979. © 2001 by American Society of Clinical Oncology. O NCOLOGISTS, in conjunction with their patients, make decisions regarding adjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer every day. Such decisions need to be individualized based on the characteristics of the primary tumor and the willingness of the patient to undergo toxicities for potential benefits. When asked about how treatment decisions are made, oncology experts routinely reply that patients need to be informed of the options and that they need to participate in the decision-making process. The question at hand is: How do physicians best inform themselves and their patients regarding the potential benefits associated with adjuvant systemic therapy for primary breast cancer? In a survey of women who had previously received adjuvant chemotherapy, only a minority of women remembered receiving any estimates regarding their prognosis with or without adjuvant systemic therapy, thus suggesting that there is room for improvement in providing patients with adequate information on adjuvant therapy. 1

[1]  P. Ravdin,et al.  Computer program to assist in making decisions about adjuvant therapy for women with early breast cancer. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[2]  A. Tsodikov,et al.  The shape of the hazard function in breast carcinoma , 1999, Cancer.

[3]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Polychemotherapy for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[4]  Mike Clarke,et al.  Tamoxifen for early breast cancer: an overview of the randomised trials , 1998, The Lancet.

[5]  P. Ravdin,et al.  Survey of breast cancer patients concerning their knowledge and expectations of adjuvant therapy. , 1998, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  R. Gray,et al.  Annual hazard rates of recurrence for breast cancer after primary therapy. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  Ravdin Pm A computer program to assist in making breast cancer adjuvant therapy decisions. , 1996 .

[8]  Ravdin Pm A computer based program to assist in adjuvant therapy decisions for individual breast cancer patients. , 1995 .

[9]  P. Novotny,et al.  Do American oncologists know how to use prognostic variables for patients with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer? , 1994, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[10]  J. Foekens,et al.  Prognostic value of PS2 and cathepsin D in 710 human primary breast tumors: multivariate analysis. , 1993, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[11]  C. Redmond,et al.  Pathologic findings from the national surgical adjuvant breast project (protocol 4): Discriminants for 15‐year survival , 1993, Cancer.

[12]  W. McGuire,et al.  Association of p53 protein expression with tumor cell proliferation rate and clinical outcome in node-negative breast cancer. , 1993, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[13]  Anthony Howell,et al.  Systemic treatment of early breast cancer by hormonal, cytotoxic, or immune therapy. 133 randomised trials involving 31,000 recurrences and 24,000 deaths among 75,000 women. Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group. , 1992 .

[14]  W. Lane,et al.  Should all patients with node‐negative breast cancer receive adjuvant therapy? Identifying additional subsets of low‐risk patients who are highly curable by surgery alone , 1991, Cancer.

[15]  S. Piantadosi,et al.  Effect of patients' expectations of benefit with standard breast cancer adjuvant chemotherapy on participation in a randomized clinical trial: a clinical vignette study. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[16]  S Hellman,et al.  Pathological prognostic factors in stage I (T1N0M0) and stage II (T1N1M0) breast carcinoma: a study of 644 patients with median follow-up of 18 years. , 1989, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[17]  I Persson,et al.  The relation between survival and age at diagnosis in breast cancer. , 1986, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  H. Høst,et al.  Age as a prognostic factor in breast cancer , 1986, Cancer.

[19]  P. Ravdin How can prognostic and predictive factors in breast cancer be used in a practical way today? , 1998, Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer.

[20]  L. Siminoff,et al.  Offering the option of randomized clinical trials to cancer patients who overestimate their prognoses with standard therapies. , 1993, Cancer investigation.

[21]  C. Redmond,et al.  Prognostic factors in NSABP studies of women with node-negative breast cancer. National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[22]  A. Harris,et al.  Epidermal growth factor receptor and other oncogenes as prognostic markers. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[23]  W. McGuire,et al.  Prognostic potential of DNA flow cytometry measurements in node-negative breast cancer patients: preliminary analysis of an intergroup study (INT 0076). , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.

[24]  P M Ravdin,et al.  Treatment decisions in axillary node-negative breast cancer patients. , 1992, Journal of the National Cancer Institute. Monographs.