An Evaluation Of The Precision Of QIAGEN Quantiplex HYres Kit As a Screening Tool On Low Level Touch DNA Evidence

Objective : The primary aim of DNA quantification in forensic DNA analysis is to determine and optimize the amount of DNA for the downstream profiling analysis. Additionally, it may be used as a parameter for the cut-off of the subsequent profiling, especially for touch DNA samples collected from property crime scenes which often contain low amount of DNA and yield no profiles. The choice of quantification kit should have both high accuracy and precision. This work aims to examine the latter of five selected commonly used real-time quantitative PCR (qPCR) kits, namely, Applied Biosystems Quantifiler® kit, Quantifiler® Y kit, Quantifiler® Duo kit, Promega Plexor® HY system and QIAGEN Quantiplex HYres kit, and to seek for a qPCR system fitted for the purpose of initial screening of touched DNA evidence for profiling. Material and Methods : In this work, we first tested the precision of the five selected qPCR kits using their respective DNA standard and human blood samples as substrates. Subsequently, we compared the capability of Quantiplex in predicting the presence of DNA with that of Quantifiler when applying a cut-off threshold of 0.0049 ng/µL and 0.023 ng/µL, i.e. their respective lowest detection limit, with reference to DNA typing analysis. Results : Our results demonstrated that Quantiplex exhibits a higher precision and consistency than the others, especially at low DNA concentration i.e. 0.016 to 0.023 ng/µL. We also showed that, by using a total of 332 simulated touch DNA samples, Quantiplex is a fairly reliable predictor of the AmpFlSTR® Identifiler® profiling results. Conclusion : Quantiplex can be employed as a cost-effective screening of samples of volume crime cases. [ 268 words ]

[1]  Stephen C. Y. Ip,et al.  An evaluation of the performance of five extraction methods: Chelex® 100, QIAamp® DNA Blood Mini Kit, QIAamp® DNA Investigator Kit, QIAsymphony® DNA Investigator® Kit and DNA IQ™. , 2015, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[2]  C. Frégeau,et al.  The Qiagen Investigator® Quantiplex HYres as an alternative kit for DNA quantification. , 2015, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[3]  Bruce McCord,et al.  Advances in forensic DNA quantification: A review , 2014, Electrophoresis.

[4]  Stephen C. Y. Ip,et al.  Forensic DNA typing strategy of degraded DNA on discarded cigarette ends using the AmpFℓSTR® Identifiler®, Identifiler® Plus and MiniFiler™ PCR amplification kits. , 2014, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[5]  M. Buoncristiani,et al.  Stochastic sampling effects in STR typing: Implications for analysis and interpretation. , 2014, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[6]  J. Barker,et al.  Qiagen's Investigator™ Quantiplex Kit as a Predictor of STR Amplification Success from Low‐Yield DNA Samples , , 2013, Journal of forensic sciences.

[7]  D. Shin,et al.  Effects of humic acid on DNA quantification with Quantifiler® Human DNA Quantification kit and short tandem repeat amplification efficiency , 2012, International Journal of Legal Medicine.

[8]  B. McCord,et al.  An analysis of single and multi-copy methods for DNA quantitation by real-time polymerase chain reaction. , 2011, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[9]  Catherine M. Grgicak,et al.  Investigation of Reproducibility and Error Associated with qPCR Methods using Quantifiler® Duo DNA Quantification Kit * , 2010, Journal of forensic sciences.

[10]  R. Fang,et al.  Developmental Validation of the Quantifiler® Duo DNA Quantification Kit for Simultaneous Quantification of Total Human and Human Male DNA and Detection of PCR Inhibitors in Biological Samples * , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[11]  Catherine M Cupples,et al.  STR Profiles from DNA Samples with “Undetected” or Low Quantifiler™ Results , 2009, Journal of forensic sciences.

[12]  Benjamin E. Krenke,et al.  Developmental validation of a real-time PCR assay for the simultaneous quantification of total human and male DNA. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[13]  W. Parson,et al.  Comparison of five DNA quantification methods. , 2008, Forensic science international. Genetics.

[14]  L. Hennessy,et al.  Developmental validation of the quantifiler real-time PCR kits for the quantification of human nuclear DNA samples. , 2005, Journal of forensic sciences.

[15]  Eric Buel,et al.  Quantification of DNA in forensic samples , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[16]  J. Fernández-Piqueras,et al.  Specific quantification of human genomes from low copy number DNA samples in forensic and ancient DNA studies. , 2003, Croatian medical journal.