Effect of stepped exposure on quantitative in vitro marginal microleakage.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] S. Uno,et al. Effect of slow-curing on cavity wall adaptation using a new intensity-changeable light source. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[2] F. Groppo,et al. Quantitative evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. , 2002, Operative dentistry.
[3] J Sutalo,et al. Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes. , 2001, Journal of oral rehabilitation.
[4] J. C. Hamilton,et al. Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[5] D C Watts,et al. Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[6] B. Willershausen,et al. Stress reduction in resin-based composites cured with a two-step light-curing unit. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.
[7] J. Ferracane,et al. The Effects of Adhesive Thickness on Polymerization Contraction Stress of Composite , 2000, Journal of dental research.
[8] K. Hiller,et al. Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". , 2000, Operative dentistry.
[9] A Versluis,et al. Do Dental Composites Always Shrink Toward the Light? , 1998, Journal of dental research.
[10] M. Torii,et al. Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stresses in resin composite restorations. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.
[11] R. Hickel,et al. Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.
[12] J. C. Pereira,et al. A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. , 1996, Operative dentistry.
[13] C. Davidson,et al. Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. , 1995, European journal of oral sciences.
[14] G. Unterbrink,et al. Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. , 1995, Journal of dentistry.
[15] R. Erickson,et al. Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. , 1994, Journal of esthetic dentistry.
[16] J. W. Curtis,et al. Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated resin composites. , 1993, American journal of dentistry.
[17] A. Feilzer,et al. Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[18] E. Asmussen,et al. Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.
[19] F. Barbakow,et al. Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[20] C. Davidson,et al. Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.
[21] C. Davidson,et al. Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.
[22] C. Davidson,et al. Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Stresses by Flow in Dental Composites , 1984, Journal of dental research.
[23] J. Bausch,et al. Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.
[24] P. Moon,et al. The Occlusal Dimensional Change Upon Glazing Porcelain , 1978, Journal of dental research.