Effect of stepped exposure on quantitative in vitro marginal microleakage.

PURPOSE The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effect of a soft-start curing mode on microleakage MATERIALS AND METHODS Standardized Class V cavities were prepared within all the margins in the buccal enamel or dentin surface of sound, freshly extracted inferior bovine incisors. Forty preparations were filled with a restorative system (Single Bond and Filtek Z250, 3M ESPE, St. Paul, MN, USA). Ten restorations of each group were made on both types of substrates and polymerized with a conventional curing technique (600 mW/cm2/40 s) or with a soft-start technique (150 mW/cm2/10 s + 600 mW/cm2/30 s). All specimens were thermocycled 3000 times and then immersed in methylene blue 2% for 12 hours. The specimen microleakage was quantitatively determined in a spectrophotometer. RESULTS The soft-start technique resulted in statistically significant less microleakage for each substrate (p < .05). The conventional groups exhibited 6.1 (dentin) to 15.4% (enamel) more leakage compared with the soft-start groups. When compared with the enamel margins, the dentin margins demonstrated greater microleakage: from 15.5% greater with the conventional light-curing mode to 25.6% greater with the soft-start light-curing mode. CONCLUSIONS The polymerization technique using a very low initial intensity (150 mW/cm2/10 s) decreased the microleakage of composite resin restorations. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE A soft-start light-curing approach to resin composite polymerization resulted in less microleakage at enamel and dentin margins in Class V cavities compared with resin composite restorations polymerized using a conventional light-curing approach.

[1]  S. Uno,et al.  Effect of slow-curing on cavity wall adaptation using a new intensity-changeable light source. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[2]  F. Groppo,et al.  Quantitative evaluation of marginal leakage of two resin composite restorations using two filling techniques. , 2002, Operative dentistry.

[3]  J Sutalo,et al.  Degree of conversion and temperature rise during polymerization of composite resin samples with blue diodes. , 2001, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[4]  J. C. Hamilton,et al.  Effect of variable light intensity on composite shrinkage. , 2000, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[5]  D C Watts,et al.  Light intensity effects on resin-composite degree of conversion and shrinkage strain. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[6]  B. Willershausen,et al.  Stress reduction in resin-based composites cured with a two-step light-curing unit. , 2000, American journal of dentistry.

[7]  J. Ferracane,et al.  The Effects of Adhesive Thickness on Polymerization Contraction Stress of Composite , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[8]  K. Hiller,et al.  Marginal adaption of Class V restorations with and without "softstart-polymerization". , 2000, Operative dentistry.

[9]  A Versluis,et al.  Do Dental Composites Always Shrink Toward the Light? , 1998, Journal of dental research.

[10]  M. Torii,et al.  Photoelastic analysis of polymerization contraction stresses in resin composite restorations. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[11]  R. Hickel,et al.  Physical properties and gap formation of light-cured composites with and without 'softstart-polymerization'. , 1997, Journal of dentistry.

[12]  J. C. Pereira,et al.  A review of polymerization contraction: the influence of stress development versus stress relief. , 1996, Operative dentistry.

[13]  C. Davidson,et al.  Influence of light intensity on polymerization shrinkage and integrity of restoration-cavity interface. , 1995, European journal of oral sciences.

[14]  G. Unterbrink,et al.  Influence of light intensity on two restorative systems. , 1995, Journal of dentistry.

[15]  R. Erickson,et al.  Bonding to tooth structure: a comparison of glass-ionomer and composite-resin systems. , 1994, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[16]  J. W. Curtis,et al.  Factors affecting cure at depths within light-activated resin composites. , 1993, American journal of dentistry.

[17]  A. Feilzer,et al.  Setting stresses in composites for two different curing modes. , 1993, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  E. Asmussen,et al.  Marginal adaptation of a restorative resin polymerized at reduced rate. , 1991, Scandinavian journal of dental research.

[19]  F. Barbakow,et al.  Quality and durability of marginal adaptation in bonded composite restorations. , 1991, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[20]  C. Davidson,et al.  Quantitative determination of stress reduction by flow in composite restorations. , 1990, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  C. Davidson,et al.  Setting Stress in Composite Resin in Relation to Configuration of the Restoration , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[22]  C. Davidson,et al.  Relaxation of Polymerization Contraction Stresses by Flow in Dental Composites , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[23]  J. Bausch,et al.  Clinical significance of polymerization shrinkage of composite resins. , 1982, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[24]  P. Moon,et al.  The Occlusal Dimensional Change Upon Glazing Porcelain , 1978, Journal of dental research.