Transcranial Direct‐Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children

&NA; This study aims to determine the effects of transcranial direct‐current stimulation (tDCS) on motor learning in healthy school‐aged children. Safety, tolerability, and translation of effects to untrained tasks were also explored. We recruited 24 right‐handed children for a randomized, sham‐controlled, double‐blinded trial to receive: right primary motor cortex (M1) 1 mA anodal (1A‐tDCS), left M1 1 mA cathodal (1C‐tDCS), left M1 2 mA cathodal tDCS (2C‐tDCS), or sham tDCS over 3 consecutive days of motor task practice. Participants trained their left hand to perform the Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) during tDCS application. Right hand and bimanual PPT, the Jebsen‐Taylor Test (JTT), and the Serial Reaction Time Task (SRTT) were tested at baseline and post‐training. All measures were retested 6 weeks later. Active tDCS montages enhanced motor learning compared with sham (all P < 0.002). Effects were sustained at 6 weeks. Effect sizes were large and comparable across montages: contralateral 1A‐tDCS (Cohen's d = 2.58) and ipsilateral 1C‐tDCS (3.44) and 2C‐tDCS (2.76). Performance in the untrained hand PPT, bilateral JTT, and SRTT often improved with tDCS. tDCS was well‐tolerated and safe with no adverse events. These first principles will advance the pairing of tDCS with therapy to enhance rehabilitation for disabled children such as those with cerebral palsy.

[1]  Manuela Galli,et al.  Effects of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation combined with virtual reality for improving gait in children with spastic diparetic cerebral palsy: a pilot, randomized, controlled, double-blind, clinical trial , 2015, Clinical rehabilitation.

[2]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive brain stimulation: from physiology to network dynamics and back , 2013, Nature Neuroscience.

[3]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Partially non‐linear stimulation intensity‐dependent effects of direct current stimulation on motor cortex excitability in humans , 2013, The Journal of physiology.

[4]  Somsak Tiamkao,et al.  Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Refractory Childhood Focal Epilepsy , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[5]  Heidi M. Schambra,et al.  Direct Current Stimulation Promotes BDNF-Dependent Synaptic Plasticity: Potential Implications for Motor Learning , 2010, Neuron.

[6]  E. Wassermann,et al.  A safety screening questionnaire for transcranial magnetic stimulation , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[7]  Virgil G Mathiowetz,et al.  The Purdue Pegboard , 1986 .

[8]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients , 2005, Neuroreport.

[9]  C. Krishnan,et al.  Safety of Noninvasive Brain Stimulation in Children and Adolescents , 2015, Brain Stimulation.

[10]  John W Krakauer,et al.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  Jonathan W. Peirce,et al.  PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in Python , 2007, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[12]  N. Jetté,et al.  An update on the prevalence of cerebral palsy: a systematic review and meta‐analysis , 2013, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[13]  A. Kirton Modeling developmental plasticity after perinatal stroke: defining central therapeutic targets in cerebral palsy. , 2013, Pediatric neurology.

[14]  Hidenao Fukuyama,et al.  Human Motor Plasticity Induced by Mirror Visual Feedback , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[15]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Contralateral and ipsilateral motor effects after transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroreport.

[16]  J. Carey,et al.  Primed low‐frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and constraint‐induced movement therapy in pediatric hemiparesis: a randomized controlled trial , 2014, Developmental medicine and child neurology.

[17]  Adam J. Woods,et al.  Dosage Considerations for Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Children: A Computational Modeling Study , 2013, PloS one.

[18]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Technology Insight: noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology—perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS , 2007, Nature Clinical Practice Neurology.

[19]  L. Bindman,et al.  Long-lasting Changes in the Level of the Electrical Activity of the Cerebral Cortex produced by Polarizing Currents , 1962, Nature.

[20]  P. Matthews,et al.  Polarity and timing-dependent effects of transcranial direct current stimulation in explicit motor learning , 2011, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  L. Cohen,et al.  Facilitating skilled right hand motor function in older subjects by anodal polarization over the left primary motor cortex , 2010, Neurobiology of Aging.

[22]  Walter Paulus,et al.  Induction of Late LTP-Like Plasticity in the Human Motor Cortex by Repeated Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Brain Stimulation.

[23]  L. Cohen,et al.  Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke , 2004, Annals of neurology.

[24]  Sergio P. Rigonatti,et al.  Enhancement of non-dominant hand motor function by anodal transcranial direct current stimulation , 2006, Neuroscience Letters.

[25]  Lena Sarp,et al.  The fade-in – Short stimulation – Fade out approach to sham tDCS – Reliable at 1 mA for naïve and experienced subjects, but not investigators , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[26]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Facilitation of Implicit Motor Learning by Weak Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation of the Primary Motor Cortex in the Human , 2003, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[27]  H. Johansen-Berg,et al.  The Role of GABA in Human Motor Learning , 2011, Current Biology.

[28]  N. Bolognini,et al.  Neuromodulation of parietal and motor activity affects motor planning and execution , 2014, Cortex.

[29]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Excitability changes induced in the human motor cortex by weak transcranial direct current stimulation , 2000, The Journal of physiology.

[30]  C. Weiller,et al.  Effects of Different Electrical Brain Stimulation Protocols on Subcomponents of Motor Skill Learning , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[31]  M. Nitsche,et al.  Sustained excitability elevations induced by transcranial DC motor cortex stimulation in humans , 2001, Neurology.

[32]  M. Hallett,et al.  Dynamic cortical involvement in implicit and explicit motor sequence learning. A PET study. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[33]  L. Bindman,et al.  The action of brief polarizing currents on the cerebral cortex of the rat (1) during current flow and (2) in the production of long‐lasting after‐effects , 1964, The Journal of physiology.

[34]  C. Freitag,et al.  Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents , 2015, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Alvaro Pascual-Leone,et al.  Interhemispheric Modulation Induced by Cortical Stimulation and Motor Training , 2010, Physical Therapy.

[36]  A. Kirton,et al.  Life after perinatal stroke. , 2013, Stroke.

[37]  J J Bartko,et al.  Subjective Reactions of Children to Single-Pulse Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2001, Journal of child neurology.

[38]  R. H. Jebsen,et al.  An objective and standardized test of hand function. , 1969, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[39]  Adam Kirton,et al.  Pediatric stroke and transcranial direct current stimulation: methods for rational individualized dose optimization , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[40]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Imaging Brain Plasticity during Motor Skill Learning , 2002, Neurobiology of Learning and Memory.

[41]  A. Kirton,et al.  Brain stimulation and constraint for perinatal stroke hemiparesis , 2016, Neurology.

[42]  R. Boyd,et al.  The Jebsen Taylor Test of Hand Function: A Pilot Test–Retest Reliability Study in Typically Developing Children , 2016, Physical & occupational therapy in pediatrics.

[43]  G. Thickbroom,et al.  Perception of comfort during transcranial DC stimulation: Effect of NaCl solution concentration applied to sponge electrodes , 2007, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[44]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Improving motor performance without training: the effect of combining mirror visual feedback with transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2015, Journal of neurophysiology.

[45]  Janine Reis,et al.  Modulation of motor performance and motor learning by transcranial direct current stimulation. , 2011, Current opinion in neurology.

[46]  J. Tiffin,et al.  The Purdue pegboard; norms and studies of reliability and validity. , 1948, The Journal of applied psychology.

[47]  Gottfried Schlaug,et al.  Dual-hemisphere tDCS facilitates greater improvements for healthy subjects' non-dominant hand compared to uni-hemisphere stimulation , 2008, BMC Neuroscience.

[48]  J. Donoghue,et al.  Conditions for the induction of long-term potentiation in layer II/III horizontal connections of the rat motor cortex. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  P. Turkeltaub,et al.  Differences in the experience of active and sham transcranial direct current stimulation , 2012, Brain Stimulation.

[50]  Christian Gerloff,et al.  Modulation of Training by Single-Session Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation to the Intact Motor Cortex Enhances Motor Skill Acquisition of the Paretic Hand , 2012, Stroke.

[51]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Noninvasive cortical stimulation enhances motor skill acquisition over multiple days through an effect on consolidation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.