A typology of European countries based on innovation efficiency and technology gaps: The role of early-stage entrepreneurship

This paper analyzes national innovation efficiency in Europe considering the role of early-stage entrepreneurship. In doing so, potential technological differences, i.e. technology gaps, are computed in a metafrontier framework taking into account that developed countries may use a different technology in producing innovation from their developing/transition counterparts. Using bootstrap DEA, we find that developing/transition countries exhibit, in average terms, twice the technology gap of that corresponding to developed economies. Based on innovation efficiency and technology gap measures, a typology of the European countries is introduced revealing features related to national strategic positioning, countries' absorptive capacity and knowledge spillover effects. The group of European innovation leaders is formed by Germany, Switzerland, Netherlands, Denmark, Austria, Iceland and Italy. Second-stage results imply that entrepreneurial activity motivated by necessity hinders the adoption of superior technology in producing innovation in Europe.

[1]  Attila Varga,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Agglomeration and Technological Change , 2005 .

[2]  Yong-Tae Park,et al.  An international comparison of R&D efficiency: DEA approach , 2005 .

[3]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Estimation and inference in two-stage, semi-parametric models of production processes , 2007 .

[4]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Statistical Inference in Nonparametric Frontier Models: The State of the Art , 1999 .

[5]  H. Leibenstein,et al.  Entrepreneurship, entrepreneurial training, and x-efficiency theory , 1987 .

[6]  Hugo Hollanders,et al.  Measuring innovation efficiency , 2007 .

[7]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  R&D and Productivity: The Unfinished Business , 1998 .

[8]  E. Wang R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach , 2007 .

[9]  Z. Ács,et al.  The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship , 2005 .

[10]  E. Ahmed,et al.  Are Asian technology gaps due to human capital quality differences , 2013 .

[11]  Roy Thurik,et al.  Erim Report Series Research in Management What's New about the New Economy? Sources of Growth in the Managed and Entrepreneurial Economies Bibliographic Data and Classifications , 2022 .

[12]  G. Battese,et al.  Metafrontier frameworks for the study of firm-level efficiencies and technology ratios , 2008 .

[13]  R. Shepherd Theory of cost and production functions , 1970 .

[14]  Zoltan Acs,et al.  How Is Entrepreneurship Good for Economic Growth? , 2006, Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization.

[15]  Stephen J. Redding,et al.  Mapping The Two Faces Of R&D: Productivity Growth In A Panel Of OECD Industries , 2000 .

[16]  Timothy Coelli,et al.  An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis , 1997 .

[17]  Roy Thurik,et al.  Linking Entrepreneurship and Economic Growth , 1999 .

[18]  Roy Thurik,et al.  The Effect of Entrepreneurial Activity on National Economic Growth , 2005 .

[19]  G. Battese,et al.  A Metafrontier Production Function for Estimation of Technical Efficiencies and Technology Gaps for Firms Operating Under Different Technologies , 2004 .

[20]  Jiancheng Guan,et al.  Modeling the relative efficiency of national innovation systems , 2012 .

[21]  Max Keilbach,et al.  Entrepreneurship Capital and Economic Performance , 2003 .

[22]  E. Autio,et al.  Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Economic Growth: Evidence from GEM data , 2005 .

[23]  K. Guy,et al.  Innovation and competitiveness: a review , 1998 .

[24]  P. W. Wilson,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of Efficiency Scores: How to Bootstrap in Nonparametric Frontier Models , 1998 .

[25]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[26]  K. Tsekouras,et al.  Are cooperatives the weakest link in European banking? A non-parametric metafrontier approach , 2010 .

[27]  R. Atoyan,et al.  Regional Economic Issues--Special Report 25 Years of Transition::Post-Communist Europe and the IMF , 2014 .

[28]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[29]  Imed Drine,et al.  Institutions, Governance and Technology Catch-Up in North Africa , 2011 .

[30]  Konstantinos Kounetas,et al.  Technology gaps in European banking: Put the blame on inputs or outputs? , 2012 .

[31]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Competition and Innovation: an Inverted-U Relationship , 2005 .

[32]  Akira Goto,et al.  R&D Capital, Rate of Return on R&D Investment and Spillover of R&D in Japanese Manufacturing Industries , 1989 .

[33]  E. Wang,et al.  Relative efficiency of R&D activities: A cross-country study accounting for environmental factors in the DEA approach , 2007 .

[34]  Seema Sharma,et al.  Inter-country R&D efficiency analysis: An application of data envelopment analysis , 2008, Scientometrics.

[35]  Francisco J. Arcelus,et al.  On the efficiency of national innovation systems , 2003 .