Tumor volume in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: comparison at CT, MR imaging, and FDG PET and validation with surgical specimen.

PURPOSE To compare computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance (MR) imaging, and fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) for delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) in pharyngolaryngeal squamous cell carcinoma and to validate results with the macroscopic surgical specimen when available. MATERIALS AND METHODS Twenty-nine patients with stages II-IV squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiation therapy or chemotherapy and radiation therapy (n = 20) or with total laryngectomy (n = 9) were enrolled. Ten patients had oropharyngeal, 13 had laryngeal, and six had hypopharyngeal tumors. CT, MR imaging, and PET were performed with patients immobilized in a customized thermoplastic mask, and images were coregistered. GTVs obtained with the three modalities were compared quantitatively and qualitatively. If patients underwent total laryngectomy, images were validated with the surgical specimen after three-dimensional coregistration. The effect of each modality was estimated with linear mixed-effects models. Adjustments for multiple comparisons were made with the Bonferonni or Sidak method. RESULTS For oropharyngeal tumors and for laryngeal or hypopharyngeal tumors, no significant difference (P >.99) was observed between average GTVs delineated at CT (32.0 and 21.4 cm(3), respectively) or MR imaging (27.9 and 21.4 cm(3), respectively), whereas average GTVs at PET were smaller (20.3 [P </=.10] and 16.4 cm(3) [P </=.01], respectively). GTVs from surgical specimens were significantly smaller (12.6 cm(3), P </=.06). In nine patients for whom a surgical specimen was available, no modality adequately depicted superficial tumor extension; this was due to limitations in spatial resolution. In addition, false-positive results were seen for cartilage, extralaryngeal, and preepiglottic extensions. CONCLUSION Compared with GTVs at CT and MR imaging, GTVs at FDG PET were smaller. In nine patients for whom a surgical specimen was available, PET was found to be the most accurate modality. However, no modality managed to depict superficial tumor extension.

[1]  Y. Pabuscu,et al.  Comparison of preoperative computed tomographic findings with postoperative histopathological findings in laryngeal cancers , 2004, European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology.

[2]  Anne Bol,et al.  Evaluation of a multimodality image (CT, MRI and PET) coregistration procedure on phantom and head and neck cancer patients: accuracy, reproducibility and consistency. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[3]  Anne Bol,et al.  Tri-dimensional automatic segmentation of PET volumes based on measured source-to-background ratios: influence of reconstruction algorithms. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  D Delbeke,et al.  Positron emission tomography imaging in oncology. , 2001, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[5]  P. Ell,et al.  Clinical role of positron emission tomography in oncology. , 2001, The Lancet. Oncology.

[6]  S R Cherry,et al.  Design and evaluation of an LSO PET detector for breast cancer imaging. , 2000, Medical physics.

[7]  Gerald J. Kutcher,et al.  The impact of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) lymph node staging on the radiation treatment volumes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer , 2000 .

[8]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Statistical approaches in quantitative positron emission tomography , 2000, Stat. Comput..

[9]  H Greess,et al.  Oropharynx, oral cavity, floor of the mouth: CT and MRI. , 2000, European journal of radiology.

[10]  D. Farina,et al.  Tumours of the oropharynx and oral cavity: perineural spread and bone invasion. , 1999, JBR-BTR : organe de la Societe royale belge de radiologie (SRBR) = orgaan van de Koninklijke Belgische Vereniging voor Radiologie.

[11]  M. Crecco,et al.  Retromolar trigone tumors: evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging and correlation with pathological data. , 1999, European journal of radiology.

[12]  R L Wahl,et al.  Head and neck cancer: detection of recurrence with three-dimensional principal components analysis at dynamic FDG PET. , 1999, Radiology.

[13]  S. Cherry,et al.  Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging. , 1999, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[14]  E Bellon,et al.  Laryngeal tumor volume measurements determined with CT: a study on intra- and interobserver variability. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  M van Herk,et al.  The potential impact of CT-MRI matching on tumor volume delineation in advanced head and neck cancer. , 1997, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[16]  T. Helliwell,et al.  Mandibular invasion in patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous carcinoma. , 1997, Clinical otolaryngology and allied sciences.

[17]  D J Hawkes,et al.  Validation and clinical application of computer-combined computed tomography and positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose head and neck images. , 1996, American journal of surgery.

[18]  M. Becker,et al.  Pretherapeutic staging of laryngeal carcinoma: Clinical findings, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging compared with histopathology , 1996, Cancer.

[19]  P. Vock,et al.  Neoplastic invasion of the laryngeal cartilage: comparison of MR imaging and CT with histopathologic correlation. , 1995, Radiology.

[20]  C. Debry,et al.  Corrélations anatomo-scanographiques des cancers du pharyngo-larynx : à propos d'une étude prospective portant sur 35 patients , 1993 .

[21]  T R Miller,et al.  Design and use of PET tomographs: the effect of slice spacing. , 1990, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.