Fetal MEG evoked response latency from beamformer with random field theory

Analysis of fetal magnetoencephalographic brain recordings is restricted by low signal to noise ratio (SNR) and non-stationarity of the sources. Beamformer techniques have been applied to improve SNR of fetal evoked responses. However, until now the effect of non-stationarity was not taken into account in detail, because the detection of evoked responses is in most cases determined by averaging a large number of trials. We applied a windowing technique to improve the stationarity of the data by using short time segments recorded during a flash-evoked study. In addition, we implemented a random field theory approach for more stringent control of false-positives in the statistical parametric map of the search volume for the beamformer. The search volume was based on detailed individual fetal/maternal biometrics from ultrasound scans and fetal heart localization. Average power over a sliding window within the averaged evoked response against a randomized average background power was used as the test z-statistic. The significance threshold was set at 10% over all members of a contiguous cluster of voxels. There was at least one significant response for 62% of fetal and 95% of newborn recordings with gestational age (GA) between 28 and 45 weeks from 29 subjects. We found that the latency was either substantially unchanged or decreased with increasing GA for most subjects, with a nominal rate of about -11 ms/week. These findings support the anticipated neurophysiological development, provide validation for the beamformer model search as a methodology, and may lead to a clinical test for fetal cognitive development.

[1]  H. Preissl,et al.  Magnetoencephalographic recordings of visual evoked brain activity in the human fetus , 2002, The Lancet.

[2]  Robert V. Brill,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers , 2004, Technometrics.

[3]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Serial magnetoencephalographic study of fetal and newborn auditory discriminative evoked responses. , 2007, Early human development.

[4]  S E Robinson,et al.  Cleaning fetal MEG using a beamformer search for the optimal forward model. , 2004, Neurology & clinical neurophysiology : NCN.

[5]  Jonathan Fulford,et al.  Initial experiences of performing fetal fMRI , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[6]  Felix Carbonell,et al.  Random fields—Union intersection tests for detecting functional connectivity in EEG/MEG imaging , 2009, Human brain mapping.

[7]  Paolo Maria Rossini,et al.  Fetal auditory responses to external sounds and mother's heart beat: Detection improved by Independent Component Analysis , 2006, Brain Research.

[8]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Optimal reduction of MCG in fetal MEG recordings , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[9]  Alan C. Evans,et al.  Detecting changes in nonisotropic images , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[10]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Neonatal and fetal response decrement of evoked responses: A MEG study , 2008, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[11]  J D Wilson,et al.  Design of a light stimulator for fetal and neonatal magnetoencephalography , 2009, Physiological measurement.

[12]  L. Galán,et al.  Random Field–Union Intersection tests for EEG/MEG imaging , 2004, NeuroImage.

[13]  Matthew J. Brookes,et al.  Optimising experimental design for MEG beamformer imaging , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  Anders Sjöström,et al.  The neonatal development of the light flash visual evoked potential , 2004, Documenta Ophthalmologica.

[15]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Detecting Activations in PET and fMRI: Levels of Inference and Power , 1996, NeuroImage.

[16]  K. Worsley,et al.  Detecting Sparse Signals in Random Fields, With an Application to Brain Mapping , 2007 .

[17]  R. Wakai,et al.  Improved neuromagnetic detection of fetal and neonatal auditory evoked responses , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  False discovery rate revisited: FDR and topological inference using Gaussian random fields , 2009, NeuroImage.

[19]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  A unified statistical approach for determining significant signals in images of cerebral activation , 1996, Human brain mapping.

[20]  W. Drongelen,et al.  Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[21]  Jonathan Marchini,et al.  Comparing methods of analyzing fMRI statistical parametric maps , 2004, NeuroImage.

[22]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Delayed maturation of auditory-evoked responses in growth-restricted fetuses revealed by magnetoencephalographic recordings. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  Shuying S Li,et al.  FDR‐controlling testing procedures and sample size determination for microarrays , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[24]  Delbert Dueck,et al.  Clustering by Passing Messages Between Data Points , 2007, Science.

[25]  G. Barnes,et al.  Statistical flattening of MEG beamformer images , 2003, Human brain mapping.

[26]  David Poeppel,et al.  Asymptotic SNR of scalar and vector minimum-variance beamformers for neuromagnetic source reconstruction , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[27]  Uwe Schneider,et al.  Developmental changes of auditory-evoked fields in fetuses , 2004, Experimental Neurology.

[28]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  An objective assessment of fetal and neonatal auditory evoked responses , 2008, NeuroImage.

[29]  J. Fock,et al.  Establishment of normal values for flash visual evoked potentials (VEPs) in preterm infants: a longitudinal study with special reference to two components of the N1 wave. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[30]  H. Preissl,et al.  Searching for the best model: ambiguity of inverse solutions and application to fetal magnetoencephalography , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[31]  H Eswaran,et al.  Validation of the flash-evoked response from fetal MEG , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[32]  Hubert Preissl,et al.  Fetal magnetoencephalography. , 2006, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[33]  Y. Benjamini,et al.  Screening for Partial Conjunction Hypotheses , 2008, Biometrics.

[34]  Douglas C. Montgomery,et al.  Applied Statistics and Probability for Engineers, Third edition , 1994 .

[35]  Jonathan E. Taylor,et al.  Empirical null and false discovery rate analysis in neuroimaging , 2009, NeuroImage.