Development of road safety performance indicators for trauma management in Europe.

Trauma management (TM) covers two types of medical treatment: the initial one provided by Emergency Medical Services (EMS) and a further one provided by permanent medical facilities. There is a consensus in the professional literature that to reduce the severity and the number of road crash victims, the TM system should provide rapid and adequate initial care of injury, combined with sufficient further treatment at a hospital or trauma centre. Recognizing the important role of TM for reducing road crash injury outcome, it was decided, within the EU funded SafetyNet project, to develop road safety performance indicators (SPIs) which would characterize the level of TM systems' performance in European countries and enable country comparisons. The concept of TM SPIs was developed based on a literature study of performance indicators in TM, a survey of available practices in Europe and data availability examinations. A set of TM SPIs was introduced including 14 indicators which characterize five issues such as: availability of EMS stations; availability and composition of EMS medical staff; availability and composition of EMS transportation units; characteristics of the EMS response time, and availability of trauma beds in permanent medical facilities. Basic information on the TM systems was collected in close cooperation with the national expert group. A dataset with TM SPIs for 21 countries was created. It was demonstrated that the countries can be compared using selected TM SPIs. Moreover, a more general comparison of the TM systems' performance in the countries is possible, using multiple ranking and statistical weighting techniques. By both methods, final estimates were received enabling the recognition of groups of countries with similar levels of the TM system's performance. The results of various trials were consistent as to the recognition of countries with high or low level of the TM systems' performance, where in grouping countries with intermediate levels of the TM system's performance some differences were observed. The SafetyNet project's practice demonstrated that data collection for estimating TM SPIs is not an easy task but is realizable for the majority of countries. The TM SPIs' message is currently limited to the availability of trauma care services. Further development of the TM SPIs should focus on characteristics of actual treatment supplied, based on combined police and medical road crash related databases.

[1]  C N Mock,et al.  Systematic review of published evidence regarding trauma system effectiveness. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[2]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Building the European Road Safety Observatory. SafetyNet. Deliverable D3.1 State of the art report on road safety performance indicators , 2005 .

[3]  A. Nathens,et al.  Development of trauma systems and effect on outcomes after injury , 2004, The Lancet.

[4]  T P Clemmer,et al.  Calf-thigh sequential pneumatic compression compared with plantar venous pneumatic compression to prevent deep-vein thrombosis after non-lower extremity trauma. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[5]  C. Tingvall,et al.  The properties of Safety Performance Indicators in target setting, projections and safety design of the road transport system. , 2010, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[6]  Bernhard Koch,et al.  Rettungsdienst in Staaten der Europäischen Union : eine vergleichende Bestandsaufnahme , 1999 .

[7]  Rune Elvik,et al.  The Handbook of Road Safety Measures , 2009 .

[8]  Kobi Peleg,et al.  Increased survival among severe trauma patients: the impact of a national trauma system. , 2004, Archives of surgery.

[9]  J. Sampalis,et al.  Trauma care regionalization: a process-outcome evaluation. , 1999, The Journal of trauma.

[10]  T. Scalea,et al.  Trauma deaths in an Italian urban area: an audit of pre-hospital and in-hospital trauma care. , 2002, Injury.

[11]  Walter Buylaert.  Reducing the severity of road injuries through post impact care. , 1999 .

[12]  M Oström,et al.  Preventability of vehicle-related fatalities. , 2001, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[13]  Charles Mock,et al.  Guidelines for essential trauma care , 2004 .

[14]  D. Cooper,et al.  Management deficiencies and death preventability of road traffic fatalities before and after a new trauma care system in Victoria, Australia. , 2007, The Journal of trauma.

[15]  J. Hedges,et al.  Does out-of-hospital EMS time affect trauma survival? , 1995, The American journal of emergency medicine.

[16]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Building the European Road Safety Observatory. SafetyNet. Deliverable D3.11a Road safety performance indicators : updated country comparisons , 2006 .

[17]  B. Tabachnick,et al.  Using Multivariate Statistics , 1983 .

[18]  Daniel O Scharfstein,et al.  A national evaluation of the effect of trauma-center care on mortality. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  Martijn Vis,et al.  Road Safety Performance Indicators: Theory. Deliverable D3.6 of the EU FP6 project SafetyNet. , 2007 .

[20]  Edward D. Rothman,et al.  Preventable Trauma Deaths in Rural Michigan , 1995 .

[21]  H Brodsky,et al.  The call for help after an injury road accident. , 1993, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[22]  C N Mock,et al.  Trauma outcomes in the rural developing world: comparison with an urban level I trauma center. , 1993, The Journal of trauma.

[23]  Vojtech Eksler,et al.  Road Safety Performance Indicators and Their Explanatory Value: A Critical View Based on the Experience of Central European Countries , 2010 .