Objective and Subjective Investigation on a Novel Method for Digital Reverberator Parameters Estimation

Reverberation is a well known effect that has an important role in our listening experience. A great deal of research has been devoted in the last decades aiming to artificially reproduce the reverberation effect exploiting a hybrid reverberation structure. In this context, several automatic procedures have been presented in the literature in order to derive the reverberator structure considering the mixing time evaluation and the minimization functions definition for the late reverberation device. Taking into consideration these aspects, a deep analysis of hybrid digital reverberator audio quality is here proposed, introducing a new parameter for the definition of the mixing time and two new cost functions for the definition of the late reverberation parameters. More in detail, starting from the considerations derived from a previous accurate approach based on the mel frequency cepstral coefficients, the new cost functions are based on the evaluation of the perceptual linear predictive and power normalized cepstral coefficients. Several results are reported, in terms of objective measure, performance analysis and subjective measures, taking into consideration different real impulse responses and various input stimuli and making a comparison with the state of the art. In particular, the obtained results show that a good accuracy can be achieved also considering a low number of coefficients, therefore improving the computational performance.

[1]  Vesa Välimäki,et al.  Linear Dynamic Range Reduction of Musical Audio Using an Allpass Filter Chain , 2013, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[2]  Barry D. Kulp,et al.  Digital Equalization Using Fourier Transform Techniques , 1988 .

[3]  Vesa Välimäki,et al.  Fifty Years of Artificial Reverberation , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[4]  Jan Berg,et al.  HIGH-PERFORMANCE REAL-TIME FIR-FILTERING USING FAST CONVOLUTION ON GRAPHICS HARDWARE , 2010 .

[5]  Rebecca Stewart,et al.  A Hybrid Artificial Reverberation Algorithm , 2007 .

[6]  H Hermansky,et al.  Perceptual linear predictive (PLP) analysis of speech. , 1990, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Stefania Cecchi,et al.  A Hybrid Approach for Real-Time Room Acoustic Response Simulation , 2010 .

[8]  Francesco Piazza,et al.  A low latency implementation of a non-uniform partitioned convolution algorithm for room acoustic simulation , 2012, Signal, Image and Video Processing.

[9]  Mark Sandler,et al.  STATISTICAL MEASURES OF EARLY REFLECTIONS OF ROOM IMPULSE RESPONSES , 2007 .

[10]  Jon Dattorro,et al.  Effect Design: Part 1: Reverberator and Other Filters , 1997 .

[11]  Jörn Loviscach,et al.  Automatic Adjustment of Off-the-Shelf Reverberation Effects , 2009 .

[12]  Barry A. Blesser An Interdisciplinary Synthesis of Reverberation Viewpoints , 2001 .

[13]  Jean-Marc Jot,et al.  Analysis and synthesis of room reverberation based on a statistical time-frequency model , 1997 .

[14]  Richard M. Stern,et al.  Power-Normalized Cepstral Coefficients (PNCC) for Robust Speech Recognition , 2016, IEEE/ACM Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[15]  Francesco Piazza,et al.  Hybrid Reverberation Algorithm: a Practical Approach , 2013 .

[16]  Jean-Dominique Polack,et al.  Measuring the mixing time in auditoria , 2008 .

[17]  Jean-Marc Jot,et al.  An analysis/synthesis approach to real-time artificial reverberation , 1992, [Proceedings] ICASSP-92: 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[18]  Jean-Marc Jot,et al.  Digital Delay Networks for Designing Artificial Reverberators , 1991 .

[19]  Jonathan S. Abel,et al.  An Emulation of the EMT 140 Plate Reverberator Using a Hybrid Reverberator Structure , 2009 .

[20]  Will Pirkle,et al.  Generating Matrix Coefficients for Feedback Delay Networks Using Genetic Algorithm , 2012 .

[21]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  Optimal Filter Partitions for Non-Uniformly Partitioned Convolution , 2012 .

[22]  Angelo Farina,et al.  Implementation of real-time partitioned convolution on a DSP board , 2003, 2003 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (IEEE Cat. No.03TH8684).

[23]  James A. Moorer,et al.  About This Reverberation Business , 1978 .

[24]  Andrew Rutherford,et al.  Introducing Anova and Ancova: A Glm Approach , 2000 .

[25]  Michael Vorländer,et al.  OPTIMAL FILTER PARTITIONS FOR REAL-TIME FIR FILTERING USING UNIFORMLY-PARTITIONED FFT-BASED CONVOLUTION IN THE FREQUENCY-DOMAIN , 2011 .

[26]  Aurelio Uncini,et al.  Real-time room acoustic response simulation by IIR adaptive filter , 2003 .

[27]  Francesco Piazza,et al.  An Advanced Implementation of a Digital Artificial Reveberator , 2011 .

[28]  Anil K. Bera,et al.  A test for normality of observations and regression residuals , 1987 .

[29]  William G. Gardner,et al.  Efficient Convolution without Input/Output Delay , 1995 .

[30]  Manfred R. Schroeder,et al.  Natural Sounding Artificial Reverberation , 1962 .

[31]  F. Piazza,et al.  An efficient DSP-based implementation of a fast convolution approach with non uniform partitioning , 2012, 2012 5th European DSP Education and Research Conference (EDERC).

[32]  J. Spall Implementation of the simultaneous perturbation algorithm for stochastic optimization , 1998 .

[33]  James C. Spall,et al.  AN OVERVIEW OF THE SIMULTANEOUS PERTURBATION METHOD FOR EFFICIENT OPTIMIZATION , 1998 .