Detection of Individual Microbubbles of Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Imaging of Free-Floating and Targeted Bubbles

Rationale and Objectives:During echo examinations with microbubble contrast, individual “dots” of ultrasound reflection can be visualized. To address the question whether these signals represent individual microbubbles, very dilute suspensions of ultrasound contrast agents or individual microbubbles attached to Petri dishes were prepared and studied by ultrasound imaging. Methods:Microbubble suspensions were diluted in saline and evaluated by a clinical ultrasound imaging system. Microbubble concentration was verified by Coulter counter. Single microbubble preparation on a Petri dish was established by streptavidin–biotin interaction under microscopy control and subjected to ultrasound imaging. Results:Ultrasound of dilute microbubble dispersions demonstrated distinct white foci; concentration of these sites was consistent with signals from individual microbubbles as determined by Coulter. Individual microbubbles immobilized on polystyrene were also visualized by ultrasound. Conclusion:Ultrasound medical systems can resolve backscatter signals from individual microbubbles of ultrasound contrast, both in solution and in the targeted immobilized state, implying picogram sensitivity.

[1]  J. G. Miller,et al.  Targeting of ultrasound contrast material. An in vitro feasibility study. , 1997, Acta radiologica. Supplementum.

[2]  P. Burns,et al.  Pulse inversion imaging of liver blood flow: improved method for characterizing focal masses with microbubble contrast. , 2000, Investigative radiology.

[3]  N. Pandian,et al.  Enhanced visualization of intravascular and left atrial appendage thrombus with the use of a thrombus-targeting ultrasonographic contrast agent (MRX-408A1): In vivo experimental echocardiographic studies. , 1999, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography : official publication of the American Society of Echocardiography.

[4]  S. Kaul,et al.  Myocardial perfusion imaging in the setting of coronary artery stenosis and acute myocardial infarction using venous injection of a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent. , 1997, Circulation.

[5]  S Otto,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 2. Experiment. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Effect of imaging parameters on the echoes from ultrasonic contrast agents , 1997, 1997 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium Proceedings. An International Symposium (Cat. No.97CH36118).

[7]  L. Hoff,et al.  Acoustic properties of NC100100 and their relation with the microbubble size distribution. , 1999, Investigative radiology.

[8]  J G Miller,et al.  Contrast Echocardiography: Current and Future Applications , 2000 .

[9]  D S Segar,et al.  Improved left ventricular endocardial border delineation and opacification with OPTISON (FS069), a new echocardiographic contrast agent. Results of a phase III Multicenter Trial. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[10]  K. Ley,et al.  Ultrasound Assessment of Inflammation and Renal Tissue Injury With Microbubbles Targeted to P-Selectin , 2001, Circulation.

[11]  F Forsberg,et al.  Clinical applications of ultrasound contrast agents. , 1998, Ultrasonics.

[12]  L. Dalla Palma,et al.  Detection of liver metastases with pulse inversion harmonic imaging: Preliminary results , 1999, European Radiology.

[13]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Detection of individual microbubbles of an ultrasound contrast agent: fundamental and pulse inversion imaging. , 2002, Academic radiology.

[14]  K. Wei.  Assessment of Myocardial Blood Flow and Volume Using Myocardial Contrast Echocardiography , 2002, Echocardiography.

[15]  S. Kaul,et al.  Hemodynamic characteristics, myocardial kinetics and microvascular rheology of FS-069, a second-generation echocardiographic contrast agent capable of producing myocardial opacification from a venous injection. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[16]  K. Nightingale,et al.  A preliminary evaluation of the effects of primary and secondary radiation forces on acoustic contrast agents , 1997, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[17]  A. Klibanov,et al.  Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging. , 1999, Advanced drug delivery reviews.

[18]  A R Jayaweera,et al.  Quantification of myocardial blood flow with ultrasound-induced destruction of microbubbles administered as a constant venous infusion. , 1998, Circulation.

[19]  W N McDicken,et al.  The behaviour of individual contrast agent microbubbles. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[20]  H. Medwin,et al.  Counting bubbles acoustically: a review , 1977 .

[21]  S. Raychaudhuri,et al.  Stabilized bubbles in the body: pressure-radius relationships and the limits to stabilization. , 1997, Journal of applied physiology.

[22]  A. Kabalnov,et al.  Dissolution of multicomponent microbubbles in the bloodstream: 1. Theory. , 1998, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[23]  P. Burns,et al.  Harmonic hepatic US with microbubble contrast agent: initial experience showing improved characterization of hemangioma, hepatocellular carcinoma, and metastasis. , 2000, Radiology.