Optical specification of time-to-passage: Observers' sensitivity to global tau.

Despite its general mathematical formulation, most empirical work on the visual perception of tau (defined as a quantity divided by its temporal derivative) has focused on the case of direct approach, with tau defined as image angle/rate of expansion. Empirical investigators tend to generalize image size analyses to off-axis approaches. However, this generalization is inappropriate for all but a few classes of objects. After mathematically reestablishing the appropriate optical cues specifying time to passage for noncollision cases, we report a series of studies in which we examined observers' sensitivities to this information in both relative- and absolute-judgment paradigms. In general, we found observers' judgments to be accurate and robust. Language: en

[1]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[2]  D. Kimura,et al.  Right Hemisphere Specialization for Depth Perception reflected in Visual Field Differences , 1971, Nature.

[3]  D. Kimura,et al.  The asymmetry of the human brain. , 1973, Scientific American.

[4]  K. Nakayama,et al.  Optical Velocity Patterns, Velocity-Sensitive Neurons, and Space Perception: A Hypothesis , 1974, Perception.

[5]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[6]  W Schiff,et al.  Information Used in Judging Impending Collision , 1979, Perception.

[7]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Tutorials in Motor Behavior , 1980 .

[8]  H. C. Longuet-Higgins,et al.  The interpretation of a moving retinal image , 1980, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences.

[9]  B. Hills.  Vision, Visibility, and Perception in Driving , 1980, Perception.

[10]  J T Todd,et al.  Visual information about moving objects. , 1981, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[11]  David N. Lee,et al.  Plummeting gannets: a paradigm of ecological optics , 1981, Nature.

[12]  Claes von Hofsten,et al.  Dialogue on perception and action , 1982 .

[13]  H. Ross,et al.  Optic-Flow and Cognitive Factors in Time-to-Collision Estimates , 1983, Perception.

[14]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing in Hitting An Accelerating Ball , 1983, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  D. Ingle,et al.  Brain mechanisms and spatial vision , 1985 .

[16]  David N. Lee,et al.  Visual Timing of Interceptive Action , 1985 .

[17]  L. Kaufman,et al.  Handbook of perception and human performance , 1986 .

[18]  D J Hannon,et al.  Eye movements and optical flow. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[19]  W Schiff,et al.  Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  P R DeLucia,et al.  Pictorial and motion-based information for depth perception. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[21]  J. Tresilian,et al.  Empirical and theoretical issues in the perception of time to contact. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  B. Frost,et al.  Time to collision is signalled by neurons in the nucleus rotundus of pigeons , 1992, Nature.

[23]  Paul A. Braren,et al.  Wayfinding on foot from information in retinal, not optical, flow. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[24]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.