Freedom and Responsibility in Synthetic Genomics: The Synthetic Yeast Project

First introduced in 2011, the Synthetic Yeast Genome (Sc2.0) Project is a large international synthetic genomics project that will culminate in the first eukaryotic cell (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) with a fully synthetic genome. With collaborators from across the globe and from a range of institutions spanning from do-it-yourself biology (DIYbio) to commercial enterprises, it is important that all scientists working on this project are cognizant of the ethical and policy issues associated with this field of research and operate under a common set of principles. In this commentary, we survey the current ethics and regulatory landscape of synthetic biology and present the Sc2.0 Statement of Ethics and Governance to which all members of the project adhere. This statement focuses on four aspects of the Sc2.0 Project: societal benefit, intellectual property, safety, and self-governance. We propose that such project-level agreements are an important, valuable, and flexible model of self-regulation for similar global, large-scale synthetic biology projects in order to maximize the benefits and minimize potential harms.

[1]  J. P. Collins,et al.  Regulating gene drives , 2014, Science.

[2]  Claire Marris,et al.  Synthetic Biology and Biosecurity: How Scared Should We Be? , 2014 .

[3]  Robert M. Friedman,et al.  Synthetic Biology and the U.S. Biotechnology Regulatory System: Challenges and Options , 2014 .

[4]  Judy Qiu,et al.  Total Synthesis of a Functional Designer Eukaryotic Chromosome , 2014, Science.

[5]  G. Palù.  Regulating dual-use research in Europe. , 2014, Science.

[6]  Peter G. Schultz,et al.  Genomically Recoded Organisms Expand Biological Functions , 2013, Science.

[7]  Patrick Joseph Heavey,et al.  Ethical Issues in Synthetic Biology , 2013 .

[8]  S. Eriksson,et al.  The ethics of disseminating dual-use knowledge , 2013 .

[9]  S. Maurer.  Taking Self-Governance Seriously: Synthetic Biology’s Last, Best Chance to Improve Security , 2012 .

[10]  Theo M Bestebroer,et al.  Airborne Transmission of Influenza A/H5N1 Virus Between Ferrets , 2012, Science.

[11]  Nicole Kronberger,et al.  Synthetic biology: taking a look at a field in the making , 2012, Public understanding of science.

[12]  Joel S. Bader,et al.  Synthetic chromosome arms function in yeast and generate phenotypic diversity by design , 2011, Nature.

[13]  R. Carlson.  Staying Sober about Science , 2011, The Hastings Center report.

[14]  M. Buck,et al.  The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity , 2011 .

[15]  J. Sadler.  Pharmaceutical Company Influence , 2011 .

[16]  Drew Endy,et al.  Synthetic genomics: Options for governance , 2007 .

[17]  M. Casal,et al.  Dissemination and survival of commercial wine yeast in the vineyard: a large-scale, three-years study. , 2005, FEMS yeast research.

[18]  R. Mortimer.  Evolution and variation of the yeast (Saccharomyces) genome. , 2000, Genome research.

[19]  A. Cropper.  Convention on Biological Diversity , 1993, Environmental Conservation.

[20]  E. Tsioumani,et al.  Summary of the Twelfth Meeting of the Conference of the Parties to the Convention on Biological Diversity and the First Meeting of the Parties to the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit-Sharing: 6-17 October 2014 , 2014 .

[21]  T. Kram,et al.  Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity CBD Technical Series No . 31 CROSSROADS OF LIFE ON EARTH Exploring means to meet the 2010 Biodiversity Target i Solution-oriented scenarios for Global Biodiversity Outlook 2 , 2010 .

[22]  Joseph F Pilat,et al.  Report of a Workshop in Nuclear Forces and Nonproliferation held at the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars, Washington, DC , 2009 .

[23]  Stephen M. Maurer,et al.  From Understanding to Action: Community-Based Options for Improving Safety and Security in Synthetic Biology , 2006 .

[24]  B. Talbot.  Introduction to recombinant DNA research, development and evolution of the NIH guidelines, and proposed legislation. , 1981, University of Toledo law review. University of Toledo. College of Law.