Following the Footnotes : A Bibliometric Analysis of Citation Patterns in Literary Studies

This thesis provides an in-depth study of the possibilities of applying bibliometric methods to the research field of literary studies. The four articles that constitute the backbone of this thesis ...

[1]  W. Clark,et al.  Academic charisma and the origins of the research university , 2006 .

[2]  Fredrik Åström.  Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990–2004 , 2007 .

[3]  Yasar Tonta,et al.  Arts and humanities literature: Bibliometric characteristics of contributions by Turkish authors , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  A. J. M. Linmans,et al.  Why with bibliometrics the Humanities does not need to be the weakest link , 2010, Scientometrics.

[5]  Joacim Hansson,et al.  How implementation of bibliometric practice affects the role of academic libraries , 2013, J. Libr. Inf. Sci..

[6]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  Changes in the LIS research front: Time-sliced cocitation analyses of LIS journal articles, 1990-2004 , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[7]  P. Weingart.  2. Interdisciplinarity: The Paradoxical Discourse , 2000 .

[8]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research , 2005 .

[9]  C. Chu.  Literary Critics at Work and their Information Needs: A Research-Phases Model. , 1999 .

[10]  W. Benjamin,et al.  Theses on the Philosophy of History , 1989 .

[11]  J. M. Bernstein.  Walter Benjamin's Passages , 1995 .

[12]  T. Finkenstaedt.  Measuring research performance in the humanities , 2005, Scientometrics.

[13]  Jonathan Furner,et al.  Scholarly communication and bibliometrics , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[14]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Article in Press G Model Journal of Informetrics a Meta-evaluation of Scientific Research Proposals: Different Ways of Comparing Rejected to Awarded Applications , 2022 .

[15]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  A comparative study of first and all-author co-citation counting, and two different matrix generation approaches applied for author co-citation analyses , 2009, Scientometrics.

[16]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents , 1973, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[17]  G. Lakoff,et al.  Metaphors We Live by , 1982 .

[18]  Svein Kyvik,et al.  Changing trends in publishing behaviour among university faculty, 1980-2000 , 2003, Scientometrics.

[19]  John Cullars,et al.  Characteristics of the Monographic Scholarship of Foreign Literary Studies by Native Speakers of English. , 1988 .

[20]  Helen Georgas,et al.  A Citation Study of the Characteristics of the Linguistics Literature , 2005 .

[21]  Rebecca Watson-Boone.  The Information Needs and Habits of Humanities Scholars. , 1994 .

[22]  Diane Rasmussen Neal,et al.  Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[23]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Linguistic Analysis of Grant Proposals: European Union Research Grants , 1999 .

[24]  Linda Butler,et al.  Extending citation analysis to non-source items , 2006, Scientometrics.

[25]  Edward A. Goedeken,et al.  Using the Arts and Humanities Citation Index to Identify a Community of Interdisciplinary Historians , 2001 .

[26]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases , 2006, Scientometrics.

[27]  John Cullars,et al.  Characteristics of the Monographic Literature of British and American Literary Studies , 1985 .

[28]  R. Merton,et al.  Genesis and development of a scientific fact , 1979 .

[29]  Tonyia J. Tidline,et al.  Scholarly work in the humanities and the evolving information environment , 2001 .

[30]  Robert E. Mercer,et al.  Using Hedges to Classify Citations in Scientific Articles , 2006, Computing Attitude and Affect in Text.

[31]  Alan M. MacEachren,et al.  How Maps Work - Representation, Visualization, and Design , 1995 .

[32]  D. Hicks.  The Four Literatures of Social Science , 2004 .

[33]  Malin Håkanson,et al.  The Impact of Gender on Citations: An Analysis of College & Research Libraries, Journal of Academic Librarianship, and Library Quarterly , 2005 .

[34]  Scott R. Hutson.  Gendered Citation Practices in American Antiquity and Other Archaeology Journals , 2002, American Antiquity.

[35]  Y. Lindholm-romantschuk.  Scholarly Book Reviewing in the Social Sciences and Humanities: The Flow of Ideas Within and Among Disciplines , 1998 .

[36]  Bill Readings.  Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation , 1994 .

[37]  Carl T. Bergstrom,et al.  The map equation , 2009, 0906.1405.

[38]  André Skupin,et al.  Discrete and continuous conceptualizations of science: Implications for knowledge domain visualization , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[39]  Sherri Edwards.  Citation analysis as a collection development tool: A bibliometric study of polymer science theses and dissertations , 1999 .

[40]  Vincent Larivière.  The historical evolution of interdisciplinarity: 1900-2008 , 2010 .

[41]  Sue Stone,et al.  Humanities scholars: Information Needs and Uses , 1982, J. Documentation.

[42]  P. Wouters.  The citation culture , 1999 .

[43]  Evaristo Jiménez-Contreras,et al.  A connectionist and multivariate approach to science maps: the SOM, clustering and MDS applied to library and information science research , 2006, J. Inf. Sci..

[44]  A. F. J. VAN RAAN,et al.  In matters of quantitative studies of science the fault of theorists is offering too little and asking too much , 1998, Scientometrics.

[45]  Peter Turchi.  Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer , 2004 .

[46]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[47]  David S. Ferris.  The Cambridge Introduction to Walter Benjamin: Contexts , 2008 .

[48]  U. Segerstråle,et al.  Real Science. What it is, and what it means , 2001 .

[49]  M. Power.  The audit society : rituals of verification , 1999 .

[50]  N. Stromquist.  Gender studies: A global perspective of their evolution contribution, and challenges to comparative higher education , 2001 .

[51]  Tony Becher,et al.  Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Enquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines , 2001 .

[52]  Francisco Herrera,et al.  Science mapping software tools: Review, analysis, and cooperative study among tools , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[53]  C. Evans.  English People: The Experience of Teaching and Learning English in British Universities , 1993 .

[54]  Y. Chung,et al.  Characteristics of References in International Classification Systems Literature , 1995, The Library Quarterly.

[55]  K. Brock Enger,et al.  Using citation analysis to develop core book collections in academic libraries , 2009 .

[56]  B. Barnes.  Practice as collective action , 2005 .

[57]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  The Visibility of Information Science and Library Science Research in Bibliometric Mapping of the LIS Field , 2010, The Library Quarterly.

[58]  Satoru Kawai,et al.  An Algorithm for Drawing General Undirected Graphs , 1989, Inf. Process. Lett..

[59]  Burt V. Bronk,et al.  Hierarchy of sciences , 1977 .

[60]  John Cullars,et al.  Citation Characteristics of Italian and Spanish Literary Monographs , 1990, The Library Quarterly.

[61]  Michèle Lamont,et al.  How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment , 2009 .

[62]  Larry L. Leslie,et al.  Academic Capitalism: Politics, Policies, and the Entrepreneurial University , 1997 .

[63]  Jennifer Thompson,et al.  The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary Scholarship , 2002 .

[64]  Lillian S. Robinson.  Treason Our Text: Feminist Challenges to the Literary Canon , 1983 .

[65]  Jeff Fort,et al.  French Theory: How Foucault, Derrida, Deleuze, & Co. Transformed the Intellectual Life of the United States , 2008 .

[66]  O. Persson,et al.  How to use Bibexcel for various types of bibliometric analysis , 2009 .

[67]  C. null,et al.  Reflections … , 1991 .

[68]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Welcome to the linguistic warp zone: Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities , 2005 .

[69]  Fredrik Åström.  Library and Information Science in Context: the development of scientific fields, and their relations to professional contexts , 2004 .

[70]  Olle Persson,et al.  The Intellectual Base and Research Fronts of JASIS 1986-1990 , 1994, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[71]  G. Heimeriks,et al.  Disciplinary, Multidisciplinary, Interdisciplinary: Concepts and Indicators. , 2001 .

[72]  H. Radder.  The Commodification of Academic Research: Science and the Modern University , 2010 .

[73]  Manfred Bonitz,et al.  The challenge of scientometrics: The development, measurement and self-organization of scientific communications , 1996, Scientometrics.

[74]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Visualizing a Discipline: An Author Co-Citation Analysis of Information Science, 1972-1995 , 1998, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[75]  Joseph T Rouse,et al.  Practice Theory , 2006 .

[76]  Richard Whitley,et al.  The Changing Governance of the Sciences : The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems , 2007 .

[77]  W. Benjamin,et al.  The Work of Walter Benjamin in the Age of Information , 2001 .

[78]  Elisabeth Davenport,et al.  Who Cites women? Whom do women cite?: an Exploration of Gender and scholarly citation in Sociology , 1995, J. Documentation.

[79]  Andrea Scharnhorst,et al.  Tracing scientific influence , 2010, ArXiv.

[80]  David S. Nolen.  Characteristics of la literatura: A Reference Study of Spanish and Latin American Literature , 2010, Coll. Res. Libr..

[81]  Henry Kreuzman.  A co-citation analysis of representative authors in philosophy: Examining the relationship between epistemologists and philosophers of science , 2001, Scientometrics.

[82]  Trudi Bellardo Hahn,et al.  Proceedings of the 1998 Conference on the History and Heritage of Science Information Systems , 1998 .

[83]  M. Gibbons,et al.  Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty , 2003 .

[84]  Gerald Grow.  Maps of the Imagination: The Writer as Cartographer , 2005 .

[85]  Lars Geschwind.  Getting Pole Position: Research strategies in the Humanities at Swedish universities , 2010 .

[86]  D. Craven.  Under the Sign of Saturn , 1981, Telos.

[87]  Anton J. Nederhof,et al.  Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the Social Sciences and the Humanities: A Review , 2006, Scientometrics.

[88]  Robert N. Broadus.  Early approaches to bibliometrics , 1987, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[89]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  Visualizing knowledge domains , 2005, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[90]  S. Turner.  What are Disciplines? And How is Interdisciplinary Different? , 2000 .

[91]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[92]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Impact of research cultures on the use of digital library resources , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[93]  Fredrik Åström,et al.  Mapping the humanities: Informetric analyses of literary studies through A&HCI data , 2011 .

[94]  Charlene Kellsey,et al.  Citation Analysis for Collection Development: A Comparative Study of Eight Humanities Fields1 , 2005, The Library Quarterly.

[95]  R. Whitley.  The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences (Second Edition: with new introductory chapter entitled 'Science Transformed? The Changing Nature of Knowledge Production at the End of the Twentieth Century') , 1984 .

[96]  M. Lamont.  How to Become a Dominant French Philosopher: The Case of Jacques Derrida , 1987, American Journal of Sociology.

[97]  Jordi Ardanuy,et al.  A citation analysis of Catalan literary studies (1974–2003): Towards a bibliometrics of humanities studies in minority languages , 2009, Scientometrics.

[98]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  Canadian collaboration networks: A comparative analysis of the natural sciences, social sciences and the humanities , 2006, Scientometrics.

[99]  D. Pontille,et al.  The controversial policies of journal ratings: evaluating social sciences and humanities , 2010 .

[100]  Suzana Sukovic.  References to e-texts in academic publications , 2009, J. Documentation.

[101]  E. Garfield.  Is Information Retrieval in the Arts and Humanities Inherently Different from That in Science? The Effect That ISI®'S Citation Index for the Arts and Humanities Is Expected to Have on Future Scholarship , 1980, The Library Quarterly.

[102]  Peter Williams,et al.  The role and future of the monograph in arts and humanities research , 2009, Aslib Proc..

[103]  M. Lamont.  Meaning-Making in Cultural Sociology: Broadening Our Agenda , 2000 .

[104]  Eelco Ferwerda,et al.  Open Access monographic publishing in the humanities , 2010, Inf. Serv. Use.

[105]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Google book search: Citation analysis for social science and the humanities , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[106]  Ismael Rafols,et al.  Content-based and algorithmic classifications of journals: Perspectives on the dynamics of scientific communication and indexer effects , 2009 .

[107]  Ronald Rousseau,et al.  Requirements for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to Pearson's correlation coefficient , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[108]  G. Gilbert.  Referencing as Persuasion , 1977 .

[109]  Ulrika Kjellman.  Från kungaporträtt till läsketikett : en domänanalytisk studie över Kungl. bibliotekets bildsamling med särskild inriktning mot katalogiserings- och indexeringsfrågor , 2006 .

[110]  J. Klein.  Humanities, Culture, and Interdisciplinarity: The Changing American Academy , 2005 .

[111]  G. Laudel,et al.  The Social Construction Of Bibliometric Evaluations , 2007 .

[112]  Fletcher T. H. Cole,et al.  Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[113]  Katherine W. McCain,et al.  Citation patterns in the history of technology , 1987 .

[114]  Herbert Snyder,et al.  Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989) , 1998, J. Inf. Sci..

[115]  Rolf A. Zwaan,et al.  Assessing the usefulness of bibliometric indicators for the humanities and the social and beha vioural sciences: A comparative study , 1989, Scientometrics.

[116]  Fletcher T. H. Cole,et al.  Libcitations: A measure for comparative assessment of book publications in the humanities and social sciences , 2009 .

[117]  Julie Thompson Klein,et al.  Crossing Boundaries: Knowledge, Disciplinarities, and Interdisciplinarities , 1996 .

[118]  K. J. Weintraub,et al.  The Humanistic Scholar and the Library , 1980, The Library Quarterly.

[119]  Ed C. M. Noyons,et al.  International Comparison of Departments' Research Performance in the Humanities , 1992, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[120]  T. Lenoir.  Instituting Science: The Cultural Production of Scientific Disciplines , 1997 .

[121]  John H. Evans.  Stratification in knowledge production: Author prestige and the influence of an American academic debate , 2005 .

[122]  H. Radder.  The Commodification of Academic Research , 2010 .

[123]  Eric H. J. Spruyt,et al.  Changing publication patterns in the Social Sciences and Humanities, 2000–2009 , 2012, Scientometrics.

[124]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Science in action : how to follow scientists and engineers through society , 1989 .

[125]  Daniel Torres-Salinas,et al.  Library Catalog Analysis as a tool in studies of social sciences and humanities: An exploratory study of published book titles in Economics , 2009, J. Informetrics.

[126]  Jean Tague-Sutcliffe,et al.  An Introduction to Informetrics , 1992, Inf. Process. Manag..

[127]  D J PRICE,et al.  NETWORKS OF SCIENTIFIC PAPERS. , 1965, Science.

[128]  Susan Peck MacDonald,et al.  Professional academic writing in the humanities and social sciences , 1996 .

[129]  L. Butler,et al.  Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts , 2003 .

[130]  K. Knorr-Cetina,et al.  Epistemic cultures : how the sciences make knowledge , 1999 .

[131]  Judith B. Wood.  The growth of scholarship: An online bibliometric comparison of dissertations in the sciences and humanities , 2005, Scientometrics.

[132]  Benoît Godin,et al.  On the origins of bibliometrics , 2006, Scientometrics.

[133]  J. Schneider.  An Outline of the Bibliometric Indicator Used for Performance-Based Funding of Research Institutions in Norway , 2009 .

[135]  C. Wennerås,et al.  Nepotism and sexism in peer-review , 1997, Nature.

[136]  Fredrik Åström.  The social and intellectual development of library and information science , 2006 .

[137]  N. Mclaughlin.  The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change , 2000 .

[138]  Björn Hellqvist,et al.  Referencing in the humanities and its implications for citation analysis , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[139]  R. Fancher.  The devil's details: A history of footnotes , 2002 .

[140]  Terry M. Heisey.  Paradigm Agreement and literature obsolescence: a Comparative Study in the literature of the dead Sea Scrolls , 1988, J. Documentation.

[141]  Björn Hammarfelt,et al.  Citation analysis on the micro level: The example of Walter Benjamin's Illuminations , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[142]  Henk F. Moed,et al.  Towards Research Performance in the Humanities , 2002, Libr. Trends.

[143]  A. Pritchard,et al.  Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics , 1969 .

[144]  Peter Ingwersen,et al.  The International Visibility and Citation Impact of Scandinavian Research Articles in Selected Social Science Fields: The Decay of a Myth , 2000, Scientometrics.

[145]  Madeleine Stern.  Characteristics of the Literature of Literary Scholarship. , 1983 .

[146]  V. Cano,et al.  Citation life cycles of ten citation classics , 1991, Scientometrics.

[147]  Linda Butler,et al.  What Happens when Funding is Linked to Publication Counts , 2004 .

[148]  Sriyani Ileperuma.  Information gathering behaviour of arts scholars in Sri Lankan universities: a critical evaluation , 2002 .

[149]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  Why has Latour's theory of citations been ignored by the bibliometric community? discussion of sociological interpretations of citation analysis , 2006, Scientometrics.

[150]  P. Weingart.  From “Finalization” to “Mode 2”: old wine in new bottles? , 1997 .

[151]  H. V. Lente,et al.  Re-thinking new knowledge production: A literature review and a research agenda , 2008 .

[152]  M. Lowe.  Reference analysis of the American Historical Review , 2003 .

[153]  John Cullars,et al.  Citation Characteristics of French and German Literary Monographs , 1989, The Library Quarterly.

[154]  Umut Al,et al.  The Differences Among Disciplines in Scholarly Communication. A Bibliometric Analysis of Theses , 2009 .

[155]  K. Hyland,et al.  Disciplinary differences: Language variation in academic discourses , 2006 .

[156]  John Cullars,et al.  Citation characteristics of English-language monographs in philosophy , 1998 .

[157]  Richard Heinzkill,et al.  Characteristics of References in Selected Scholarly English Literary Journals , 1980, The Library Quarterly.

[158]  Vladimir Batagelj,et al.  Exploratory Social Network Analysis with Pajek , 2005 .

[159]  Walter D. Mignolo.  Canons A(nd)Cross-Cultural Boundaries (Or, Whose Canon are We Talking about?) , 1991 .

[160]  A. Elzinga.  The New Production of Knowledge. The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1997 .

[161]  W. Glänzel.  BIBLIOMETRICS AS A RESEARCH FIELD A course on theory and application of bibliometric indicators , 2003 .

[162]  Henry G. Small,et al.  Maps of science as interdisciplinary discourse: co-citation contexts and the role of analogy , 2010, Scientometrics.

[163]  M. Foucault,et al.  The archaeology of knowledge ; and, The discourse on language , 1972 .

[164]  S. Shapin.  The Scientific Life: A Moral History of a Late Modern Vocation , 2008 .

[165]  Vincent Larivière,et al.  The place of serials in referencing practices: Comparing natural sciences and engineering with social sciences and humanities , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[166]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The relations between qualitative theory and scientometric methods in science and technology studies , 1989, Scientometrics.

[167]  Michèle Lamont,et al.  What is Originality in the Humanities and the Social Sciences? , 2004 .

[168]  Alexander I. Pudovkin,et al.  Algorithmic procedure for finding semantically related journals , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[169]  Birger Larsen,et al.  What to include in a social sciences and humanities citation index: an empirical analysis , 2011 .

[170]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A mapping on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[171]  N. D. Bellis.  Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics , 2009 .

[172]  Rickard Danell,et al.  The top eight percent: development of approved and rejected applicants for a prestigious grant in Sweden , 2006 .

[173]  Carole L. Palmer,et al.  Scholarship and disciplinary practices , 2008, Annu. Rev. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[174]  Karl Erik Rosengren.  Sociological aspects of the literary system , 1969 .

[175]  Jean-Pierre V. M. Hérubel,et al.  Citation Studies in the Humanities and Social Sciences , 1994 .

[176]  James H. Sweetland,et al.  Errors in Bibliographic Citations: A Continuing Problem , 1989, The Library Quarterly.

[177]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Book reviews in humanities research evaluations , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[178]  S. Schwartzman,et al.  The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies , 1994 .

[179]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Variations between subjects in the extent to which the social sciences have become more interdisciplinary , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[180]  Alan Singleton,et al.  Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis; from the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics , 2010, Learn. Publ..

[181]  Björn Hammarfelt,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and the intellectual base of literature studies: citation analysis of highly cited monographs , 2011, Scientometrics.

[182]  E. Goedeken,et al.  Metadisciplinarity, Belles Lettres, and André Malraux , 2000 .

[183]  Alexander Styhre,et al.  The practice turn in contemporary theory , 2003 .

[184]  Björn Hammarfelt,et al.  Price revisited: on the growth of dissertations in eight research fields , 2011, Scientometrics.

[185]  Kevin W. Boyack,et al.  Indicator-assisted evaluation and funding of research: Visualizing the influence of grants on the number and citation counts of research papers , 2003, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[186]  W. Benjamin,et al.  The Arcades Project , 1999 .

[187]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Maps on the basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The journals Leonardo and Art Journal versus "Digital Humanities" as a topic , 2009, ArXiv.

[188]  Lois Quam,et al.  The Audit Society: Rituals of Verification , 1998 .

[189]  Benoît Godin,et al.  From Eugenics to Scientometrics , 2007, Social studies of science.

[190]  Norman Kaplan,et al.  The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations , 1974 .

[191]  K. K. Cetina,et al.  The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory , 2001 .

[192]  Howard D. White,et al.  Combining bibliometrics, information retrieval, and relevance theory, Part 1: First examples of a synthesis , 2007, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[193]  Julian Warner,et al.  The Role of monographs in scholarly Communication: an Empirical Study of Philosophy, Sociology and Economics , 1996, J. Documentation.

[194]  Erika Dowell,et al.  Interdisciplinarity and New Methodologies in Art History: A Citation Analysis , 1999, Art Documentation: Journal of the Art Libraries Society of North America.

[195]  Diana Crane,et al.  Invisible colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities , 1972, Medical History.

[196]  K. Brner.  Atlas of Science: Visualizing What We Know , 2010 .

[197]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  The Endless Transition: A "Triple Helix" of University-Industry-Government Relations , 2014 .

[198]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The Digital Future is Now: A Call to Action for the Humanities , 2009, Digit. Humanit. Q..

[199]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Searching for electronic journal articles to support academic tasks. A case study of the use of the Finnish National Electronic Library (FinELib) , 2006, Inf. Res..

[200]  Pertti Vakkari,et al.  Impact of research cultures on the use of digital library resources , 2007 .