Measuring virtuality in an organisational context: a quantitative study of Brazilian manufacturing companies

The aim of this research is to analyse virtuality as a measurable construct along three dimensions internal customers, external customers and suppliers, characterising companies according to their virtuality level. Cluster analyses were applied to achieve this aim. The results reveal three major groups differentiated by the type of information technology tools adopted, transactional versus collaborative profile and performance perceived by managers. This study indicated several managerial implications. First, only 31% of the companies analysed are applying tools in different dimensions internal customer, suppliers and customers to interact and conduct business in a synchronised and synergistic form aligned with the concept of a virtual organisation. Second, the group of companies that present a higher level of virtuality have a perceived improvement in performance by managers.

[1]  Mei Lu,et al.  How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization , 2005, Inf. Syst. J..

[2]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain environment , 2001 .

[3]  C. Scholz The Virtual Corporation : Empirical Evidences to a Three Dimensional Model , 2022 .

[4]  Jürgen Seitz,et al.  Challenges and conflicts integrating heterogeneous data warehouses in virtual organisations , 2012, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[5]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Organizing a virtual manufacturing enterprise: an analytic network process based approach for enterprise flexibility , 2009 .

[6]  John P. Ulhøi,et al.  A framework for conceptualising virtual organising , 2010 .

[7]  Angappa Gunasekaran,et al.  Agile manufacturing: A framework for research and development , 1999 .

[8]  Aleda V. Roth,et al.  B2B seller competence: Construct development and measurement using a supply chain strategy lens , 2007 .

[9]  A. Oke,et al.  Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: A resource-based theory perspective , 2007 .

[10]  V. Corvello,et al.  Virtual forms for the organization of production: A comparative analysis , 2007 .

[11]  Paul R. Gamble,et al.  The Virtual Corporation: An IT Challenge , 1992 .

[12]  Shailesh S. Kulkarni,et al.  Agility in manufacturing systems: an exploratory modeling framework and simulation , 2001 .

[13]  M. Barratt,et al.  Exploring internal and external supply chain linkages: Evidence from the field , 2011 .

[14]  A. Gunasekaran,et al.  A framework for supply chain performance measurement , 2004 .

[15]  Bob Travica,et al.  Organizational aspects of the virtual library: A survey of academic libraries , 1999 .

[16]  Jussi Okkonen How virtuality affects knowledge work: points on performance and knowledge management , 2004, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[17]  M. Venkatraman,et al.  Real Strategies for Virtual Organizing , 1998 .

[18]  Bill Karakostas A cloud architecture for dynamic virtual organisations in transport logistics , 2013, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[19]  S. Koh,et al.  ERP II: The involvement, benefits and impediments of collaborative information sharing , 2008 .

[20]  Shouhong Wang,et al.  Information technology enabled meta-management for virtual organizations , 2002 .

[21]  Bob Travica,et al.  The Design of the Virtual Organization: A Research Model , 1997 .

[22]  Sabine T. Köszegi,et al.  Measuring the degree of virtualization - an empirical analysis in two Austrian industries , 2003, 36th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003. Proceedings of the.

[23]  Hafida Bouarfa,et al.  The management of virtual collaborative design , 2010, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[24]  Luc Cassivi,et al.  The Role of Collaboration on Process, Relational, and Product Innovations in a Supply Chain , 2008, Int. J. e Collab..

[25]  M. Malone The Virtual Corporation , 1993 .

[26]  Heungshik Oh,et al.  The impact of decision-making sharing between supplier and manufacturer on their collaboration performance , 2005 .

[27]  Olivia Fachrunnisa A simulation-based framework of performance monitoring and incentive mechanism for successful interactions in virtual environment , 2014, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[28]  Ricardo Chalmeta,et al.  References architectures for enterprise integration , 2001, J. Syst. Softw..

[29]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  A Model of Organizational Integration, Implementation Effort, and Performance , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[30]  Abbe Mowshowitz,et al.  Virtual organization , 1997, CACM.

[31]  Maria Caridi,et al.  Do virtuality and complexity affect supply chain visibility , 2010 .

[32]  Steve Muylle,et al.  How to Plan E-Business Initiatives in Established Companies , 2007 .

[33]  Bob Travica,et al.  ICAAAC Model of Virtual Organization , 1999 .

[34]  Ned Kock,et al.  Benefits for virtual organizations from distributed groups , 2000, CACM.

[35]  Américo Azevedo A emergência da empresa virtual e os requisitos para os sistemas de informação , 2000 .

[36]  Helen Walker,et al.  The virtual organisation: a new organisational form? , 2006, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[37]  K. H. Park,et al.  Virtual enterprise – organisation, evolution and control , 2001 .

[38]  M. F. Cohen Alguns aspectos do uso da informação na economia da informação , 2002 .

[39]  Ricardo J. Rabelo,et al.  A KPI model for logistics partners' search and suggestion to create virtual organisations , 2013, Int. J. Netw. Virtual Organisations.

[40]  K. R. Harrigan An Application of Clustering for Strategic Group Analysis , 1985 .

[41]  Sandhya Shekhar,et al.  Understanding the virtuality of virtual organizations , 2006 .

[42]  Hamideh Afsarmanesh,et al.  A framework for virtual organization creation in a breeding environment , 2007, Annu. Rev. Control..

[43]  Malcolm Warner,et al.  Managing in Virtual Organizations , 2003 .

[44]  Michael J. Shaw,et al.  Characteristics of electronic markets , 1997, Decis. Support Syst..

[45]  Vincenzo Corvello,et al.  Cooperation and coordination in virtual enterprises: The role of e-collaboration tools , 2006, AIM Conference.

[46]  Qing Cao,et al.  The impact of alignment between virtual enterprise and information technology on business performance in an agile manufacturing environment , 2005 .

[47]  Anil Gurung,et al.  The role of virtuality and work family conflict in forming attitudes towards virtual work , 2007, Int. J. Inf. Syst. Chang. Manag..

[48]  Hamideh Afsarmanesh,et al.  Virtual Enterprises: life cycle supporting tools and technologies , 1998 .

[49]  Bob Travica,et al.  Virtual organization and electronic commerce , 2005, DATB.

[50]  Ik-Whan G. Kwon,et al.  Relationship between supply chain performance and degree of linkage among supplier, internal integration, and customer , 2007 .

[51]  Valéry Merminod,et al.  How does PLM technology support knowledge transfer and translation in new product development? Transparency and boundary spanners in an international context , 2012, Inf. Organ..

[52]  Denis Royston Towill,et al.  Arcs of supply chain integration , 2011 .