Performance criteria for the benchmarking of air quality model regulatory applications: the ‘target’ approach

The definition of appropriate performance criteria is one of the key issues for the benchmarking of air quality models in regulatory applications. As part of the FAIRMODE benchmarking activities (Thunis et al., 2010), suitable criteria for air quality modelling in the frame of the EU air quality directive (AQD) 2008 are proposed and tested. The suggested approach builds on the target indicator (Jolliff et al., 2009) as support to the relative directive error, the current official statistical parameter as defined in the AQD (EEA, 2011), for quantitatively estimating model performances in air quality modelling applications. This study describes the advantages of using the target compared to the actual limitations of RDE and addresses the main links between the target and some ‘traditional’ statistical indicators (MFB, R, FAC2, σ ). It also describes the application of this methodology to NO 2 , O 3 and PM 10 concentrations on three different model-observations datasets. Among these datasets two focus on the urban areas of Madrid and London and include modelled results provided by the air quality models CMAQ and ADMS-Urban for years 2007 and 2008 respectively. One other dataset (POMI) covering the Po valley and including multiple model results has also been tested for year 2005.

[1]  Robert Yamartino,et al.  Chapter 4.12 Analyzing the response of a chemical transport model to emissions reductions utilizing various grid resolutions , 2006 .

[2]  R. Sokhi,et al.  Evaluation of a CMAQ simulation at high resolution over the UK for the calendar year 2003 , 2010 .

[3]  Philippe Thunis,et al.  Analysis of model responses to emission-reduction scenarios within the CityDelta project , 2007 .

[4]  D. Byun,et al.  Review of the Governing Equations, Computational Algorithms, and Other Components of the Models-3 Community Multiscale Air Quality (CMAQ) Modeling System , 2006 .

[5]  Claudio Carnevale,et al.  Design and validation of a multiphase 3D model to simulate tropospheric pollution. , 2008 .

[6]  R. Vautard,et al.  Aerosol modeling with CHIMERE—preliminary evaluation at the continental scale , 2004 .

[7]  A. Russell,et al.  PM and light extinction model performance metrics, goals, and criteria for three-dimensional air quality models , 2006 .

[8]  Greg Yarwood,et al.  Model sensitivity evaluation for organic carbon using two multi-pollutant air quality models that simulate regional haze in the southeastern United States , 2006 .

[9]  Steven R. Hanna,et al.  Evaluation of the ADMS, AERMOD, and ISC3 dispersion models with the OPTEX, Duke Forest, Kincaid, Indianapolis and Lovett field datasets , 2001 .

[10]  K. Taylor Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram , 2001 .

[11]  C. Stow,et al.  Skill Assessment for Coupled Biological/Physical Models of Marine Systems. , 2009, Journal of marine systems : journal of the European Association of Marine Sciences and Techniques.

[12]  Robert E. Davis,et al.  Statistics for the evaluation and comparison of models , 1985 .