Semisupervised Training of a Brain MRI Tumor Detection Model Using Mined Annotations.

Background Artificial intelligence (AI) applications for cancer imaging conceptually begin with automated tumor detection, which can provide the foundation for downstream AI tasks. However, supervised training requires many image annotations, and performing dedicated post hoc image labeling is burdensome and costly. Purpose To investigate whether clinically generated image annotations can be data mined from the picture archiving and communication system (PACS), automatically curated, and used for semisupervised training of a brain MRI tumor detection model. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, the cancer center PACS was mined for brain MRI scans acquired between January 2012 and December 2017 and included all annotated axial T1 postcontrast images. Line annotations were converted to boxes, excluding boxes shorter than 1 cm or longer than 7 cm. The resulting boxes were used for supervised training of object detection models using RetinaNet and Mask region-based convolutional neural network (R-CNN) architectures. The best-performing model trained from the mined data set was used to detect unannotated tumors on training images themselves (self-labeling), automatically correcting many of the missing labels. After self-labeling, new models were trained using this expanded data set. Models were scored for precision, recall, and F1 using a held-out test data set comprising 754 manually labeled images from 100 patients (403 intra-axial and 56 extra-axial enhancing tumors). Model F1 scores were compared using bootstrap resampling. Results The PACS query extracted 31 150 line annotations, yielding 11 880 boxes that met inclusion criteria. This mined data set was used to train models, yielding F1 scores of 0.886 for RetinaNet and 0.908 for Mask R-CNN. Self-labeling added 18 562 training boxes, improving model F1 scores to 0.935 (P < .001) and 0.954 (P < .001), respectively. Conclusion The application of semisupervised learning to mined image annotations significantly improved tumor detection performance, achieving an excellent F1 score of 0.954. This development pipeline can be extended for other imaging modalities, repurposing unused data silos to potentially enable automated tumor detection across radiologic modalities. © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

[1]  Yizhou Yu,et al.  Semi-Supervised Medical Image Detection with Adaptive Consistency and Heterogeneous Perturbation , 2021, medRxiv.

[2]  John-Paul J. Yu,et al.  Diagnostic Accuracy and Failure Mode Analysis of a Deep Learning Algorithm for the Detection of Intracranial Hemorrhage. , 2021, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[3]  Yuanyuan Wang,et al.  MRI Manufacturer Shift and Adaptation: Increasing the Generalizability of Deep Learning Segmentation for MR Images Acquired with Different Scanners. , 2020, Radiology. Artificial intelligence.

[4]  Rickmer Braren,et al.  Secure, privacy-preserving and federated machine learning in medical imaging , 2020, Nature Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Nigam H Shah,et al.  Ethics of Using and Sharing Clinical Imaging Data for Artificial Intelligence: A Proposed Framework. , 2020, Radiology.

[6]  Jason M. Johnson,et al.  Computer-aided Detection of Brain Metastases in T1-weighted MRI for Stereotactic Radiosurgery Using Deep Learning Single-Shot Detectors. , 2020, Radiology.

[7]  Ho Sung Kim,et al.  Reproducibility and Generalizability in Radiomics Modeling: Possible Strategies in Radiologic and Statistical Perspectives , 2019, Korean journal of radiology.

[8]  Daniel L Rubin,et al.  Advancing Semantic Interoperability of Image Annotations: Automated Conversion of Non-standard Image Annotations in a Commercial PACS to the Annotation and Image Markup , 2019, Journal of Digital Imaging.

[9]  Marcus A. Badgeley,et al.  Confounding variables can degrade generalization performance of radiological deep learning models , 2018, ArXiv.

[10]  Ashirbani Saha,et al.  Deep learning for segmentation of brain tumors: Impact of cross‐institutional training and testing , 2018, Medical physics.

[11]  Stephen M. Moore,et al.  The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating a Public Information Repository , 2013, Journal of Digital Imaging.