A regional optimization model for waste-to-energy generation using agricultural vegetative residuals.

The spatial distribution of vegetative agricultural residuals (VAR) implies that any waste treatment system (WTS) designed to manage VAR is particularly sensitive to transportation costs. Additionally, a wide range of treatment technologies is potentially available for VAR treatment, but some of them lack a well-developed market for their output products. This study develops a method to design an economically feasible VAR treatment system, analyzing the profitability of the system as a function of logistics and uncertain market prices of the available treatment technologies' products. The design method includes an economic optimization model followed by a sensitivity analysis of the potential changes in the system's profitability. The results show that the market price of the treatment technologies' products has a larger impact on the system's profitability than transportation costs. Specifically, if biochar prices reach the level forecasted by experts, pyrolysis will become the dominant technology of the WTS. The research highlights the importance of the treatment technology selection and the location of treatment facilities in the design of an optimal WTS for VAR.

[1]  Tristan R. Brown,et al.  Regional Differences in the Economic Feasibility of Advanced Biorefineries: Fast Pyrolysis and Hydroprocessing , 2013 .

[2]  Deger Saygin,et al.  Assessment of the technical and economic potentials of biomass use for the production of steam, chemicals and polymers , 2014 .

[3]  D. Reheul,et al.  Effect of organic and mineral fertilizers on soil P and C levels, crop yield and P leaching in a long term trial on a silt loam soil , 2014 .

[4]  Ilias P Tatsiopoulos,et al.  Combined Municipal Solid Waste and biomass system optimization for district energy applications. , 2014, Waste management.

[5]  P. Pavan,et al.  Thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of cattle manure with agro-wastes and energy crops: comparison of pilot and full scale experiences. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[6]  N.S.L. Srivastava,et al.  Investigating the energy use of vegetable market waste by briquetting , 2014 .

[7]  G. Edwards‐Jones,et al.  In-Vessel Cocomposting of Green Waste With Biosolids and Paper Waste , 2007 .

[8]  Danièle Revel,et al.  Renewable energy technologies: cost analysis series , 2012 .

[9]  D. Medic Investigation of torrefaction process parameters and characterization of torrefied biomass , 2012 .

[10]  Alice Favero,et al.  Trade of woody biomass for electricity generation under climate mitigation policy. , 2013 .

[11]  Dinesh Mohan,et al.  Organic and inorganic contaminants removal from water with biochar, a renewable, low cost and sustainable adsorbent--a critical review. , 2014, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Cost,et al.  Global Bioenergy Supply and Demand Projections: A working paper for REmap 2030 , 2014 .

[13]  Massimo Monteleone,et al.  Optimal locations of bioenergy facilities, biomass spatial availability, logistics costs and GHG (greenhouse gas) emissions: a case study on electricity productions in South Italy , 2015 .

[14]  Thomas Kätterer,et al.  Rotational grass/clover for biogas integrated with grain production - A life cycle perspective , 2014 .

[15]  Jaswinder Singh,et al.  Overview of electric power potential of surplus agricultural biomass from economic, social, environmental and technical perspective—A case study of Punjab , 2015 .

[16]  P.Vignesh G.Arun Kumar T.Ganesh Refuse Derived Fuel To Electricity , 2013 .

[17]  Daniele Cocco,et al.  Biogas from anaerobic digestion of fruit and vegetable wastes: Experimental results on pilot-scale and preliminary performance evaluation of a full-scale power plant , 2014 .

[18]  N. Bolan,et al.  Biochar as a sorbent for contaminant management in soil and water: a review. , 2014, Chemosphere.