Multiple Testings: Multiple Comparisons and Multiple Endpoints*

This paper gives a brief overview of some issues and some general concepts related to multiple testing problems as they are encountered in clinical drug trials. Some recent methods for handling multiple comparisons are discussed. Emphasis is given to the p-value-based procedures and the general closed testing procedure of Marcus, Peritz, and Gabriel (1). Examples are given to illustrate these procedures and to highlight some important issues. Regarding multiple endpoints, the discussion focuses on the need to have a better definition of what primary, coprimary, and secondary endpoints should mean, and suggests that a clinical decision rule defined in terms of primary, coprimary, and relevant secondary endpoints is a clinically relevant way of reducing the dimensionality problem of multiple endpoints. These clinical decision rules, however, often lack a statistical support structure. Further research in this area is needed.

[1]  M F Huque,et al.  A reviewer's perspective on multiple endpoint issues in clinical trials. , 1997, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[2]  D. A. Williams,et al.  The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. , 1972, Biometrics.

[3]  P. O'Brien Procedures for comparing samples with multiple endpoints. , 1984, Biometrics.

[4]  M F Huque,et al.  Some comments on frequently used multiple endpoint adjustment methods in clinical trials. , 1997, Statistics in medicine.

[5]  Stephen Senn,et al.  Statistical Issues in Drug Development , 1997 .

[6]  D. Follmann Multivariate tests for multiple endpoints in clinical trials. , 1995, Statistics in Medicine.

[7]  A. Tamhane,et al.  Step-up multiple testing of parameters with unequally correlated estimates. , 1995, Biometrics.

[8]  D. Rom,et al.  On closed test procedures for dose‐response analysis , 1994 .

[9]  S. Holm A Simple Sequentially Rejective Multiple Test Procedure , 1979 .

[10]  D. A. Williams,et al.  A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. , 1971, Biometrics.

[11]  P Bauer,et al.  Multiple testing in clinical trials. , 1991, Statistics in medicine.

[12]  G. Hommel A stagewise rejective multiple test procedure based on a modified Bonferroni test , 1988 .

[13]  Y Hochberg,et al.  Multiple test procedures for dose finding. , 1996, Biometrics.

[14]  B. Rüger Das maximale signifikanzniveau des Tests: “LehneHo ab, wennk untern gegebenen tests zur ablehnung führen” , 1978 .

[15]  Y. Hochberg A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance , 1988 .

[16]  D. J. Bartholomew,et al.  A TEST OF HOMOGENEITY FOR ORDERED ALTERNATIVES. II , 1959 .

[17]  Williams Da,et al.  A test for differences between treatment means when several dose levels are compared with a zero dose control. , 1971 .

[18]  E. Laska,et al.  Testing whether an identified treatment is best. , 1989, Biometrics.

[19]  Nancy L. Geller,et al.  An approximate likelihood ratio test for a normal mean vector with nonnegative components with application to clinical trials , 1989 .

[20]  K. Gabriel,et al.  On closed testing procedures with special reference to ordered analysis of variance , 1976 .

[21]  D I Tang,et al.  On the design and analysis of randomized clinical trials with multiple endpoints. , 1993, Biometrics.

[22]  Williams Da,et al.  The comparison of several dose levels with a zero dose control. , 1972 .

[23]  G Wassmer,et al.  Procedures for two-sample comparisons with multiple endpoints controlling the experimentwise error rate. , 1991, Biometrics.