Top‐Down and Bottom‐Up Control of Stream Periphyton: Effects of Nutrients and Herbivores

We conducted two experiments to determine the relative effects of herbivory and nutrients on an algal community in Walker Branch, a stream having effectively two trophic levels: primary producers and herbivorous snails. The first study (1989), performed in streamside channels, tested the effects of three factors: (1) stream water nitrogen (N), (2) phosphorus (P), and (3) snail grazing, on periphyton biomass, productivity, and community composition. The second study (1990), conducted in situ, tested the effects of snail grazing and nutrients (N + P). In the 1989 study, nutrients had positive effects, and herbivores had negative effects, on algal biomass (chlorophyll a, ash-free dry mass, total algal biovol? ume) and primary productivity (area- and chlorophyll-specific). Likewise, both nutrients and snail grazing exerted effects (+ and -, respectively) on biomass measured in the 1990 study (chlorophyll a, algal biovolume). Grazed communities were dominated by chloro- phytes and cyanophytes, which were overgrown by diatoms when herbivores were removed. Algal species that were reduced most by herbivores were increased most by nutrient ad? dition, and vice versa, suggesting a trade-off between resistance to herbivory and nutrient- saturated growth rates. Increases in algal biomass and productivity were slight with the addition of either N or P compared to responses observed when both nutrients were added together, suggesting that both nutrients were at growth-limiting levels. The greatest changes in periphyton structure or function were observed when both nutrients were added and simultaneously, grazers were removed, in contrast to lesser effects when nutrients were added under grazed conditions or grazers were removed at low nutrient levels, indicating dual control by both factors. Nutrient addition also positively affected snail growth in both experiments, indicating tight coupling between herbivore and algal growth (top-down ef? fects) and that bottom-up factors that directly affected plant growth could also indirectly affect consumers belonging to higher trophic levels. Indices quantifying the direct effects of top-down factors relative to bottom-up factors (top-down index, TDI) and the importance of interactions between these factors (interaction coefficient, IC) were computed. These indices showed that the relative strength of top-down and bottom-up factors varied among biomass and productivity parameters and that top-down and bottom-up effects, alone, were less important than their combined effects.

[1]  B. Cuker Grazing and nutrient interactions in controlling the activity and composition of the epilithic algal community of an arctic lake1 , 1983 .

[2]  C. Pringle Effects of Water and Substratum Nutrient Supplies on Lotic Periphyton Growth: An Integrated Bioassay , 1987 .

[3]  T. Parsons,et al.  A practical handbook of seawater analysis , 1968 .

[4]  S. Carpenter,et al.  Regulation of Lake Primary Productivity by Food Web Structure. , 1987, Ecology.

[5]  Walter R. Hill,et al.  Functional Responses Associated with Growth Form in Stream Algae , 1992, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[6]  J. Stockner,et al.  Enhancement of Autotrophic Production by Nutrient Addition in a Coastal Rainforest Stream on Vancouver Island , 1978 .

[7]  J. Elwood,et al.  Role of Nutrient Cycling and Herbivory in Regulating Periphyton Communities in Laboratory Streams , 1991 .

[8]  C. Robinson,et al.  RESOURCE LIMITATION IN A STREAM COMMUNITY: PHOSPHORUS ENRICHMENT EFFECTS ON PERIPHYTON AND GRAZERS' , 1990 .

[9]  M. Vanni Effects of Nutrients and Zooplankton Size on the Structure of a Phytoplankton Community , 1987 .

[10]  G. Fairchild,et al.  Effects of nutrient (N, P, C) enrichment upon periphyton standing crop, species composition and primary production in an oligotrophic softwater lake , 1988 .

[11]  V. Resh,et al.  Stream Periphyton and Insect Herbivores: An Experimental Study of Grazing by a Caddisfly Population , 1983 .

[12]  M. Vanni,et al.  Seasonal patterns of grazing and nutrient limitation of phytoplankton in a eutrophic lake , 1990 .

[13]  Donald R. Strong,et al.  ARE TROPHIC CASCADES ALL WET? DIFFERENTIATION AND DONOR-CONTROL IN SPECIOSE ECOSYSTEMS' , 1992 .

[14]  W. Hill,et al.  Periphyton Responses to Higher Trophic Levels and Light in a Shaded Stream , 1990 .

[15]  D. T. C. Friend A Simple Method of Measuring Integrated Light Values in the Field , 1961 .

[16]  J. Hobbie,et al.  A continuous‐flow periphyton bioassay: Tests of nutrient limitation in a tundra stream1 , 1983 .

[17]  P. Mccormick,et al.  Effects of Snail Grazing on Benthic Algal Community Structure in Different Nutrient Environments , 1989, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[18]  A. J. Stewart,et al.  Grazer Control of Algae in an Ozark Mountain Stream: Effects of Short-Term Exclusion , 1988 .

[19]  S. Gregory Plant-Herbivore Interactions in Stream Systems , 1983 .

[20]  S. Gaines,et al.  A Unified Approach to Marine Plant-Herbivore Interactions. I. Populations and Communities , 1981 .

[21]  S. Fretwell,et al.  The Regulation of Plant Communities by the Food Chains Exploiting Them , 2015 .

[22]  Walter R. Hill,et al.  Photosynthesis–light relations of stream periphyton communities , 1991 .

[23]  A. Steinman,et al.  Effects of Three Herbivores on Periphyton Communities in Laboratory Streams , 1987, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[24]  M. Lynch,et al.  Predation, enrichment, and phytoplankton community structure1 , 1981 .

[25]  M. Winterbourn Interactions among nutrients, algae and invertebrates in a New Zealand mountain stream , 1990 .

[26]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Phosphorus Dynamics in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: A Study of Nutrient Spiralling , 1983 .

[27]  John R. Post,et al.  Trophic Relationships in Freshwater Pelagic Ecosystems , 1986 .

[28]  J. Jacoby Alterations in periphyton characteristics due to grazing in a Cascade foothill stream , 1987 .

[29]  D. J. Nelson,et al.  Periphyton production and grazing rates in a stream measured with a 32p material balance method , 1972 .

[30]  S. Fretwell Food chain dynamics: the central theory of ecology? , 1987 .

[31]  M. D. Marcus Periphytic Community Response to Chronic Nutrient Enrichment by a Reservoir Discharge , 1980 .

[32]  J. Newbold,et al.  The Limiting Role of Phosphorus in a Woodland Stream Ecosystem: Effects of P Enrichment on Leaf Decomposition and Primary Producers , 1981 .

[33]  J. Elwood,et al.  Extraction with DMSO to simultaneously measure periphyton photosynthesis, chlorophyll, and ATP1,2 , 1987 .

[34]  M. A. Leibold,et al.  Resource Edibility and the Effects of Predators and Productivity on the Outcome of Trophic Interactions , 1989, The American Naturalist.

[35]  A. Hershey,et al.  Nutrient Incluence on a Stream Grazer: Orthocladius Microcommunities Respond to Nutrient Input , 1988 .

[36]  L. Oksanen,et al.  Exploitation Ecosystems in Gradients of Primary Productivity , 1981, The American Naturalist.

[37]  J. Newbold,et al.  Continuous ammonium enrichment of a woodland stream: uptake kinetics, leaf decomposition, and nitrification , 1983 .

[38]  S. Hurlbert Pseudoreplication and the Design of Ecological Field Experiments , 1984 .

[39]  M. Power,et al.  Effects of Fish in River Food Webs , 1990, Science.

[40]  A. Steinman,et al.  Effects of Herbivore Type and Density on Taxonomic Structure and Physiognomy of Algal Assemblages in Laboratory Streams , 1987, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[41]  R. Wiegert,et al.  Trophic structure, available resources and population density in terrestrial vs. aquatic ecosystems. , 1971, Journal of theoretical biology.

[42]  W. Hill,et al.  Experimental Analysis of the Grazing Interaction Between a Mayfly and Stream Algae. , 1987, Ecology.

[43]  V. Resh,et al.  Periphyton responses to invertebrate grazing and riparian canopy in three northern California coastal streams , 1989 .