When No One is Watching: Ecological Momentary Assessment to Understand Situated Social Robot Use in Healthcare

∗Socially-Assistive Robots (SARs) hold great potential to revolutionize the way we manage chronic illness outside clinical settings, but a current limitation to their broad adoption for this purpose is the lack of “ground truth” around interactions between robots and humans in in-home settings. Such ground truth is a necessity for using robotic sensor data for machine learning models of patient activity patterns or to create AI to customize robotic interactive behavior autonomously. Traditional subjective recall-based data collection methods lack the fine-grained temporal detail to support such AI development, as well as suffering from “recall bias” effects. One potential solution to this challenge is to adapt novel forms of interaction assessment, such as ecological momentary assessment (EMA), to collect patient interaction data in real-time. Here we describe a pilot study utilizing such an EMA system with SARs. We describe the development of the EMA framework, theoretical design issues, and lessons learned. Preliminary machine learning results indicate 75-80% accuracy for detecting specific interaction modalities. We also discuss the potential utility of EMA for exploring cross-cultural differences with in-the-wild robot use, and as a tool to support participatory design research on robotics in healthcare settings. ∗Corresponding Author: Casey C. Bennett, Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from permissions@acm.org. HAI ’21, November 09–11, 2021, Virtual Event, Japan © 2021 Association for Computing Machinery. ACM ISBN 978-1-4503-8620-3/21/11. . . $15.00 https://doi.org/10.1145/3472307.3484670 CCS CONCEPTS • ; • Human-centered computing → Human computer interaction (HCI); HCI design and evaluation methods; • Computer systems organization→ Embedded and cyber-physical systems; Robotics; • Applied computing→ Life and medical sciences; Health informatics;

[1]  Ennio Gambi,et al.  Time synchronization and data fusion for RGB-Depth cameras and inertial sensors in AAL applications , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW).

[2]  Bruce A. MacDonald,et al.  The Role of Healthcare Robots for Older People at Home: A Review , 2014, Int. J. Soc. Robotics.

[3]  P. Cuijpers,et al.  Early intervention to reduce the global health and economic burden of major depression in older adults. , 2012, Annual review of public health.

[4]  M. McInnis,et al.  Predicting Mood Disturbance Severity with Mobile Phone Keystroke Metadata: A BiAffect Digital Phenotyping Study , 2018, Journal of medical Internet research.

[5]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Culturally Variable Preferences for Robot Design and Use in South Korea, Turkey, and the United States , 2014, 2014 9th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[6]  S. Shiffman,et al.  Ecological momentary assessment. , 2008, Annual review of clinical psychology.

[7]  David S. Rosenblum,et al.  From action to activity: Sensor-based activity recognition , 2016, Neurocomputing.

[8]  Aditya Ponnada,et al.  μEMA: Microinteraction-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) using a smartwatch , 2016, UbiComp.

[9]  Verónica Bolón-Canedo,et al.  A review of microarray datasets and applied feature selection methods , 2014, Inf. Sci..

[10]  Marek P. Michalowski,et al.  Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab , 2006, 9th IEEE International Workshop on Advanced Motion Control, 2006..

[11]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  A Robot of My Own: Participatory Design of Socially Assistive Robots for Independently Living Older Adults Diagnosed with Depression , 2015, HCI.

[12]  Hassan Ghasemzadeh,et al.  Multi-sensor fusion in body sensor networks: State-of-the-art and research challenges , 2017, Inf. Fusion.

[13]  Pamela J. Hinds,et al.  Robots in the Wild , 2018, ACM Trans. Hum. Robot Interact..

[14]  Hanyu Wang,et al.  LSTM-CNN Architecture for Human Activity Recognition , 2020, IEEE Access.

[15]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  Sensing Companions: Potential Clinical Uses of Robot Sensor Data for Home Care of Older Adults with Depression , 2018, HRI.

[16]  Jessica S. Ancker,et al.  Effects of workload, work complexity, and repeated alerts on alert fatigue in a clinical decision support system , 2017, BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making.

[17]  Wan Ling Chang,et al.  PARO robot affects diverse interaction modalities in group sensory therapy for older adults with dementia , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).

[18]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  More than just friends: in-home use and design recommendations for sensing socially assistive robots (SARs) by older adults with depression , 2019, Paladyn J. Behav. Robotics.

[19]  Wendy Moyle,et al.  The Effectiveness of Social Robots for Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Studies , 2018, The Gerontologist.

[20]  T. Trull,et al.  Clinical assessment of affective instability: comparing EMA indices, questionnaire reports, and retrospective recall. , 2009, Psychological assessment.

[21]  Christian Balkenius,et al.  Mutual Recognition in Human-Robot Interaction: a Deflationary Account , 2018, Philosophy & Technology.

[22]  Serge Thill,et al.  Companion robots for older people: importance of user-centred design demonstrated through observations and focus groups comparing preferences of older people and roboticists in South West England , 2019, BMJ Open.

[23]  G Wickström,et al.  The "Hawthorne effect"--what did the original Hawthorne studies actually show? , 2000, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[24]  Magalie Ochs,et al.  Brain activity during reciprocal social interaction investigated using conversational robots as control condition , 2019, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B.

[25]  Godwin Ogbuabor,et al.  Human Activity Recognition for Healthcare using Smartphones , 2018, ICMLC.

[26]  Jamie Bennett,et al.  Healthcare in the Smart Home: A Study of Past, Present and Future , 2017 .

[27]  D. Elbourne,et al.  Systematic review of the Hawthorne effect: New concepts are needed to study research participation effects☆ , 2014, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[28]  Selma Sabanovic,et al.  A Robot a Day Keeps the Blues Away , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Healthcare Informatics (ICHI).

[29]  Kai Zheng,et al.  Medication safety alert fatigue may be reduced via interaction design and clinical role tailoring: a systematic review , 2019, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[30]  Alexander Mertens,et al.  Human–Robot Collaboration Acceptance Model: Development and Comparison for Germany, Japan, China and the USA , 2019, International Journal of Social Robotics.

[31]  Jesse Hoey,et al.  Sensor-Based Activity Recognition , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part C (Applications and Reviews).

[32]  Erin D. Reilly,et al.  Use of Social Robots in Mental Health and Well-Being Research: Systematic Review , 2019, Journal of medical Internet research.

[33]  Stephen Lindsay,et al.  Engaging older people using participatory design , 2012, CHI.

[34]  F. Routhier,et al.  Impact of COVID-19 on Older Adults: A Rapid Review. , 2021, JMIR aging.

[35]  Alexander P Demos,et al.  Effects of mood and aging on keystroke dynamics metadata and their diurnal patterns in a large open-science sample: A BiAffect iOS study , 2020, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[36]  John S. Strauss,et al.  Assessing Schizophrenia in Daily Life: The Experience Sampling Method. , 1996 .

[37]  Kris K. Hauser,et al.  Artificial intelligence framework for simulating clinical decision-making: A Markov decision process approach , 2013, Artif. Intell. Medicine.

[38]  Nitesh V. Chawla,et al.  SMOTE: Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique , 2002, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[39]  Yufei Chen,et al.  Performance Analysis of Smartphone-Sensor Behavior for Human Activity Recognition , 2017, IEEE Access.

[40]  K. Dautenhahn,et al.  Differences on social acceptance of humanoid robots between Japan and the UK , 2015 .

[41]  Elin A. Björling,et al.  Designing for engagement: using participatory design to develop a social robot to measure teen stress , 2017, SIGDOC.

[42]  Katsumi Watanabe,et al.  Perception of an Android Robot in Japan and Australia: A Cross-Cultural Comparison , 2014, ICSR.

[43]  Hee Rin Lee,et al.  Towards Culturally Robust Robots: A Critical Social Perspective on Robotics and Culture , 2014 .

[44]  Isaac S Kohane,et al.  Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare , 2019, Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning for Business for Non-Engineers.