Effects of viscous behavior of geosynthetic reinforcement and foundation soils on the performance of reinforced embankments

Abstract The combined effects of viscoelastic behavior of geosynthetic reinforcement and viscoplastic nature of rate-sensitive foundation soils on the performance of reinforced embankments are investigated. The variation of viscoelastic properties is examined using geosynthetic products that are made of polyester, polypropylene and polyethylene. The foundation soils consist of two soft clay deposits with different strain-rate sensitivities. Embankment construction is numerically simulated to identify the magnitude of creep deformation of the reinforcement and the foundation soil under both limit state and working stress conditions and the consequent effects on the stability of the embankment. It is shown that the creep of geosynthetic reinforcement and foundation soil can decrease the short-term stability of embankments and that the mobilized reinforcement stiffness and corresponding tensile force can be significantly lower than that measured from standard laboratory test. The isochronous stiffness can reasonably represent the mobilized reinforcement stiffness at the critical stage of the embankment. During post-construction periods, reinforcement strain can increase substantially and it has shown that the increase in reinforcement strain is largely due to the viscoplastic behavior of foundation soils. The mobilized reinforcement strain under working stress conditions with respect to reinforcement stiffness are also discussed.

[1]  Tony M. Allen Determination of long-term tensile strength of geosynthetics: a state-of-the-art review , 1991 .

[2]  Thomas C. Sheahan,et al.  RATE-DEPENDENTUNDRAINED SHEAR BEHAVIOR OF SATURATEDCLAY , 1996 .

[3]  Nayef M Qasem Creep of geotextiles , 1986 .

[4]  Fred H. Kulhawy,et al.  Manual on estimating soil properties for foundation design , 1990 .

[5]  I. Lee,et al.  Soil mechanics: Selected topics; , 1968 .

[6]  Sean Douglas Hinchberger The Behaviour Of Reinforced And Unreinforced Embankments On Rate-sensitive Clayey Foundations , 1996 .

[7]  S.M.B. Helwany,et al.  CREEP AND STRESS RELAXATION OF GEOTEXTILE-REINFORCED SOILS , 1998 .

[8]  K. L. Soderman,et al.  STABILIZATION OF VERY SOFT SOILS USING HIGH STRENGTH GEOSYNTHETICS: THE ROLE OF FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSES , 1987 .

[9]  R. Kerry Rowe,et al.  The significance of rate effects in modelling the Sackville test embankment , 1998 .

[10]  R. K. Rowe,et al.  Influence of Creep and Stress-Relaxation of Geosynthetic Reinforcement on Embankment Behaviour , 2001 .

[11]  Wai-Fah Chen,et al.  Nonlinear analysis in soil mechanics : theory and implementation , 1990 .

[12]  C. Taechakumthorn,et al.  Combined effect of PVDs and reinforcement on embankments over rate-sensitive soils , 2008 .

[13]  J. Graham,et al.  Time effects on the stress-strain behaviour of natural soft clays , 1983 .

[14]  Ian D. Moore,et al.  Nonlinear mechanical response of high density polyethylene. Part II: Uniaxial constitutive modeling , 1997 .

[15]  A. Casacrande,et al.  Effect of Rate of Loading on the Strength of Clays and Shales at Constant Water Content , 1951 .

[16]  Jorge G. Zornberg,et al.  Conventional and accelerated creep tests on nonwoven needle-punched geotextiles , 2005 .

[17]  Ilan Juran,et al.  Design of Geosynthetic-Reinforced Soil Structures , 1992 .

[18]  J. Z. Zhu,et al.  The finite element method , 1977 .

[19]  Dennis E Becker,et al.  Eighteenth Canadian Geotechnical Colloquium: Limit States Design For Foundations. Part I. An overview of the foundation design process , 1996 .

[20]  Richard Varuso,et al.  Geosynthetic reinforced levee test section on soft normally consolidated clays , 2005 .

[21]  K C Yeo,et al.  THE BEHAVIOUR OF A REINFORCED TRIAL EMBANKMENT ON SOFT SHALLOW FOUNDATIONS ---PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON THEORY AND PRACTICE OF EARTH REINFORCEMENT, FUKUOKA, KYUSHU, JAPAN, 5-7 OCTOBER 1988 , 1988 .

[22]  R. Sarsby Use of 'Limited Life Geotextiles' (LLGs) for Basal Reinforcement of Embankments Built on Soft Clay , 2007 .

[23]  Robert D. Holtz,et al.  Geosynthetic Reinforced Embankments on Soft Foundations , 2001 .

[24]  R. A. Jewell,et al.  Long term strength and safety in steep soil slopes reinforced by polymer materials , 1988 .

[25]  Dennes T. Bergado,et al.  2D and 3D numerical simulations of reinforced embankments on soft ground , 2008 .

[26]  Kenichi Soga,et al.  Rate-dependent Deformation of Structured Natural Clays , 1996 .

[27]  M. Biot General Theory of Three‐Dimensional Consolidation , 1941 .

[28]  Sean D. Hinchberger,et al.  Modelling the rate-sensitive characteristics of the Gloucester foundation soil , 1998 .

[29]  N. Janbu Soil Compressibility as Determined by Oedometer and Triaxial Tests , 1963 .

[30]  Jack Fowler,et al.  Fabric reinforced embankment test section, plaquemine Parish, Louisiana, USA , 1987 .

[31]  Piotr Perzyna,et al.  The constitutive equations for rate sensitive plastic materials , 1963 .

[32]  Serge Leroueil,et al.  Importance of Strain Rate and Temperature Effects in Geotechnical Engineering , 1996 .

[33]  R. K. Rowe,et al.  Behaviour of reinforced embankments on soft rate-sensitive soils , 2002 .

[34]  L. Bjerrum,et al.  Embankments on Soft Ground , 1973 .

[35]  R. Kerry Rowe,et al.  SOME DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS FOR EMBANKMENTS ON RATE SENSITIVE SOILS , 2002 .

[36]  Richard Varuso,et al.  DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF A GEOSYNTHETIC REINFORCED LEVEE TEST SECTION , 1999 .

[37]  Dov Leshchinsky,et al.  Creep and Stress Relaxation of Geogrids , 1997 .