An evaluation of odor repellent effectiveness in prevention of wildlife-vehicle collisions.

Wildlife-vehicle collisions (WVC) amount to 11% of all registered traffic crashes in the Czech Republic causing, apart from numerous deaths and serious injuries to animals, property damage and injuries to car passengers. Odor repellents have the potential to lower the overall number of WVC and allow animals to cross roads at the same time. We tested the effectiveness of odor repellent preparation in prevention of WVC. 18 places were selected on the Czech road network where WVC were concentrated on the basis of traffic crash data. Control sections on the same road segments were also delimited in order to keep the traffic intensities constant. We applied a Before-After-Control-Impact (BACI) study design to control not only the effect of the measures but also the expected natural variations in wildlife populations over time. Data were compared before and after odor repellent installations. Wildlife carcass gathering was carried out during the spring and autumn. We also used the police crash database to supplement carcass data when no field works were carried out. 201 killed mammals (roe deer and wild boars) were identified in total over 47 months. We applied a Bayesian approach as only a limited numbers of WVC were available. A WVC decrease between 26 - 43% can be expected on the treated road sections. These numbers are, however, up to three-times lower than those claimed by producers of odor preparations.

[1]  Richard Andrášik,et al.  Identification of hazardous road locations of traffic accidents by means of kernel density estimation and cluster significance evaluation. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[2]  S D Simon,et al.  Understanding the odds ratio and the relative risk. , 2001, Journal of andrology.

[3]  Michael R. Conover,et al.  Monetary and intangible valuation of deer in the United States. , 1997 .

[4]  James E. Miller,et al.  Wildlife damage management : prevention, problem solving & conflict resolution , 2013 .

[5]  J. Russell Mason,et al.  Mammal repellents: options and considerations for development , 1998 .

[6]  M. Elmeros,et al.  Effectiveness of odour repellents on red deer (Cervus elaphus) and roe deer (Capreolus capreolus): a field test , 2011, European Journal of Wildlife Research.

[7]  Carlos Fonseca,et al.  Wild boar populations up, numbers of hunters down? A review of trends and implications for Europe. , 2015, Pest management science.

[8]  David J. C. MacKay,et al.  Information Theory, Inference, and Learning Algorithms , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[9]  HARRY P. ANDREASSEN,et al.  THE EFFECT OF SCENT-MARKING, FOREST CLEARING, AND SUPPLEMENTAL FEEDING ON MOOSE–TRAIN COLLISIONS , 2005 .

[10]  Dietland Müller-Schwarze,et al.  Responses of Young Black-Tailed Deer to Predator Odors , 1972 .

[11]  Frank Gross,et al.  A Guide to Developing Quality Crash Modification Factors , 2010 .

[12]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Methods to Reduce Traffic Crashes Involving Deer: What Works and What Does Not , 2004, Traffic injury prevention.

[13]  Ibrahim Yilmaz,et al.  Geographical information systems aided traffic accident analysis system case study: city of Afyonkarahisar. , 2008, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[14]  Dale L. Nolte,et al.  Comparison of active ingredients and delivery systems in deer repellents , 2001 .

[15]  Laura A. Romin,et al.  Deer-Vehicle Collisions: Nationwide Status of State Monitoring Activities and Efforts , 1996 .

[16]  Z. Keken,et al.  Effectiveness and costs of odor repellents in wildlife–vehicle collisions: A case study in Central Bohemia, Czech Republic , 2015 .

[17]  Trina Rytwinski,et al.  How Effective Is Road Mitigation at Reducing Road-Kill? A Meta-Analysis , 2016, PloS one.

[18]  R. J. Putmam Deer and Road Traffic Accidents: Options for Management , 1997 .

[19]  J. Russell Mason Avoidance of Methiocarb-Poisoned Apples by Red-Winged Blackbirds , 1989 .

[20]  R. Whittaker,et al.  Allelochemics: chemical interactions between species. , 1971, Science.

[21]  Joseph J. Pignatello,et al.  Aversive responses of white-tailed deer,Odocoileus virginianus, to predator urines , 1991, Journal of Chemical Ecology.

[22]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[23]  Giorgos Mountrakis,et al.  Spatial wildlife-vehicle collision models: a review of current work and its application to transportation mitigation projects. , 2011, Journal of environmental management.

[24]  G. Orizaola,et al.  Response of predator-naive newt larvae to food and predator presence , 2003 .

[25]  Richard Andrášik,et al.  The KDE+ software: a tool for effective identification and ranking of animal-vehicle collision hotspots along networks , 2015, Landscape Ecology.

[26]  Robert H. Whittaker,et al.  Allomones and Kairomones: Transspecific Chemical Messengers , 1970 .

[27]  Richard Andrášik,et al.  Srazenazver.cz: A system for evidence of animal-vehicle collisions along transportation networks , 2017 .

[28]  R Andrášik,et al.  How (not) to work with small probabilities: Evaluating the individual risk of railway transport , 2016 .